World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 94 10459 9820 142 137 618 33711

Philipp Schuetz publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Philipp Schuetz between 1985 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Philipp Schuetz published across 41 years, from 1985 to 2025, averaging 17.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 69 publications in 2019. 55 of the 717 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1985 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 69. Peak 69 publications in 2019. 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 7 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 3 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 14 publications 2009: 14 publications 2010: 27 publications 2011: 27 publications 2012: 23 publications 2013: 37 publications 2014: 35 publications 2015: 41 publications 2016: 42 publications 2017: 62 publications 2018: 53 publications 2019: 69 publications 2020: 48 publications 2021: 64 publications 2022: 42 publications 2023: 41 publications 2024: 32 publications 2025: 23 publications
1985 2025

717 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Philipp Schuetz: publications per year, 1985 to 2025
Year Publications
1985 1
1986 0
1987 0
1988 7
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 0
2004 1
2005 3
2006 2
2007 9
2008 14
2009 14
2010 27
2011 27
2012 23
2013 37
2014 35
2015 41
2016 42
2017 62
2018 53
2019 69
2020 48
2021 64
2022 42
2023 41
2024 32
2025 23
Total 717
Download as CSV

Philipp Schuetz publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philipp Schuetz sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 601–620 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 618 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396 618
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Philipp Schuetz D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philipp Schuetz sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 94–95 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 94 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808 94
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Philipp Schuetz is affiliated with the University of Basel in Switzerland, focusing primarily on medical research. Their main field of study is Medicine, with a significant number of publications totaling 459 works. Within this broad area, they concentrate on several subfields including Physiology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Epidemiology, Geriatrics and Gerontology, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

The scientist's research extensively covers topics related to nutrition and health, particularly in aging populations. Key areas of their work include Nutrition and Health in Aging, Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology, Frailty in Older Adults, Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment, Diet and Metabolism Studies, Heart Failure Treatment and Management, and Emergency and Acute Care Studies.

Philipp Schuetz has contributed to a range of academic journals and publication venues. The most frequent among these are Clinical Nutrition, Swiss Medical Weekly, Clinical Nutrition ESPEN, Nutrients, and Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM).

Frequently collaborating with other researchers, Philipp Schuetz's coauthors include Beat Müeller, Zeno Stanga, Nina Kaegi-Braun, Alexander Kutz, and Pascal Tribolet. These collaborators have coauthored numerous papers, reflecting a network of ongoing scientific partnerships.

Several recent papers highlight the focus and scope of their research activity:

  • Management of disease-related malnutrition for patients being treated in hospital, 2021, The Lancet
  • Association of Baseline Inflammation With Effectiveness of Nutritional Support Among Patients With Disease-Related Malnutrition, 2020, JAMA Network Open
  • Nutritional support during the hospital stay reduces mortality in patients with different types of cancers: secondary analysis of a prospective randomized trial, 2021, Annals of Oncology
  • Role of procalcitonin use in the management of sepsis, 2020, Journal of Thoracic Disease
  • Inflammation and Nutrition: Friend or Foe?, 2023, Nutrients

Best Publications

  • Effect of Procalcitonin-Based Guidelines vs Standard Guidelines on Antibiotic Use in Lower Respiratory Tract Infections: The ProHOSP Randomized Controlled Trial

    Philipp Schuetz;Mirjam Christ-Crain;Robert Thomann;Claudine Falconnier

  • Procalcitonin to initiate or discontinue antibiotics in acute respiratory tract infections

    Philipp Schuetz;Yannick Wirz;Ramon Sager;Mirjam Christ-Crain

  • Individualised nutritional support in medical inpatients at nutritional risk: a randomised clinical trial.

    Philipp Schuetz;Rebecca Fehr;Valerie Baechli;Martina Geiser

  • Procalcitonin for diagnosis of infection and guide to antibiotic decisions: past, present and future.

    Philipp Schuetz;Werner Albrich;Beat Mueller

  • Procalcitonin Algorithms for Antibiotic Therapy Decisions: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials and Recommendations for Clinical Algorithms

    Philipp Schuetz;Victor Chiappa;Matthias Briel;Jeffrey L. Greenwald

  • Short-term vs Conventional Glucocorticoid Therapy in Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: The REDUCE Randomized Clinical Trial

    Jörg D. Leuppi;Philipp Schuetz;Roland Bingisser;Michael Bodmer

  • Effect of procalcitonin-guided antibiotic treatment on mortality in acute respiratory infections: a patient level meta-analysis

    Philipp Schuetz;Yannick Wirz;Ramon Sager;Mirjam Christ-Crain;Mirjam Christ-Crain

  • Procalcitonin-guided antibiotic use vs a standard approach for acute respiratory tract infections in primary care.

    Matthias Briel;Philipp Schuetz;Beat Mueller;Jim Young

  • Erratum to: 36th International Symposium on Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine: Brussels, Belgium. 15-18 March 2016

    R. M. Bateman;M. D. Sharpe;J. E. Jagger;C. G. Ellis

  • Adjunct prednisone therapy for patients with community-acquired pneumonia: a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial

    Claudine Angela Blum;Nicole Nigro;Matthias Briel;Matthias Briel;Philipp Schuetz

  • Nutritional Risk Screening and Assessment

    Emilie Reber;Filomena Gomes;Maria F. Vasiloglou;Philipp Schuetz

  • Procalcitonin levels predict bacteremia in patients with community-acquired pneumonia: a prospective cohort trial.

    Fabian Müller;Mirjam Christ-Crain;Thomas Bregenzer;Martin Krause

  • ESPEN guidelines on nutritional support for polymorbid internal medicine patients.

    Filomena Gomes;Philipp Schuetz;Lisa Bounoure;Peter Austin

  • Diabetic status and the relation of the three domains of glycemic control to mortality in critically ill patients: an international multicenter cohort study.

    James S Krinsley;Moritoki Egi;Alex Kiss;Amin N Devendra

  • Procalcitonin to Guide Initiation and Duration of Antibiotic Treatment in Acute Respiratory Infections: An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis

    Philipp Schuetz;Philipp Schuetz;Matthias Briel;Mirjam Christ-Crain;Daiana Stolz

  • Copeptin: A novel, independent prognostic marker in patients with ischemic stroke

    Mira Katan;Felix Fluri;Nils G Morgenthaler;Philipp Schuetz

  • Procalcitonin-guided diagnosis and antibiotic stewardship revisited

    Ramon Sager;Alexander Kutz;Beat Mueller;Philipp Schuetz

  • The association of endothelial cell signaling, severity of illness, and organ dysfunction in sepsis

    Nathan I Shapiro;Philipp Schuetz;Kiichiro Yano;Midori Sorasaki

  • Procalcitonin to initiate or discontinue antibiotics in acute respiratory tract infections (Review)

    Schuetz P;Müller B;Christ-Crain M;Stolz D

Frequent Co-Authors

Mirjam Christ-Crain
Mirjam Christ-Crain University of Basel
Beat Müller
Beat Müller University of Basel
Matthias Briel
Matthias Briel University Hospital of Basel
Michael Tamm
Michael Tamm University Hospital of Basel
Heiner C. Bucher
Heiner C. Bucher University Hospital of Basel
Nicolas Rodondi
Nicolas Rodondi University of Bern
Nathan I. Shapiro
Nathan I. Shapiro Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Tobias Welte
Tobias Welte University of Hannover
Nils G. Morgenthaler
Nils G. Morgenthaler Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Marc Y. Donath
Marc Y. Donath University of Basel

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a future in medicine or healthcare, there are flexible and accessible online degree paths that might complement or expand your career options. Many students look for programs with faster completion times and approachable entry requirements.

For nurses interested in earning advanced qualifications, easy dnp programs can allow working professionals to earn a Doctor of Nursing Practice with less stress. If you are just starting out, fast lpn program options help students begin their practical nursing careers quickly and efficiently.

Specializations are also possible, such as the msn to pmhnp online route for those who want a mental health focus. Alternatively, for those interested in the management side of healthcare, exploring the best online mha programs can offer leadership opportunities in a wide range of settings.

Exploring these related degrees and pathways can provide flexible, affordable, and accelerated options while shaping a rewarding healthcare career.

Best Scientists Citing Philipp Schuetz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles