World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 84 14986 14108 217 209 266 29309

Beat Müller publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Beat Müller between 1973 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Beat Müller published across 52 years, from 1973 to 2024, averaging 6.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 35 publications in 2007. 2 of the 353 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1973 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 35. Peak 35 publications in 2007. 1973: 1 publication 1974: 1 publication 1975: 4 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 2 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 12 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 17 publications 2004: 15 publications 2005: 21 publications 2006: 26 publications 2007: 35 publications 2008: 20 publications 2009: 17 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 20 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 16 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 1 publication
1973 2024

353 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Beat Müller: publications per year, 1973 to 2024
Year Publications
1973 1
1974 1
1975 4
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 1
1991 0
1992 2
1993 0
1994 1
1995 2
1996 2
1997 2
1998 2
1999 4
2000 6
2001 12
2002 8
2003 17
2004 15
2005 21
2006 26
2007 35
2008 20
2009 17
2010 15
2011 10
2012 20
2013 16
2014 14
2015 16
2016 10
2017 10
2018 12
2019 10
2020 9
2021 6
2022 4
2023 1
2024 1
Total 353
Download as CSV

Beat Müller publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Beat Müller sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 261–280 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 266 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722 266
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Beat Müller D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Beat Müller sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 84–85 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 84 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003 84
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Beat Müller is affiliated with the University of Basel in Switzerland. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science and earth and planetary sciences, with particular involvement in subfields such as environmental chemistry, ecology, pollution, oceanography, and geochemistry and petrology.

Their work extensively covers topics including soil and water nutrient dynamics, wastewater treatment and nitrogen removal, aquatic ecosystems and phytoplankton dynamics, marine and coastal ecosystems, microbial community ecology and physiology, aquatic invertebrate ecology and behavior, and coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics.

Beat Müller has published in several scientific venues, with frequent contributions to Environmental Science & Technology, Aquatic Sciences, Limnology and Oceanography, mSphere, and Chemical Geology.

Notable recent publications include:

  • "Hypolimnetic oxygen depletion rates in deep lakes: Effects of trophic state and organic matter accumulation" (2020, Limnology and Oceanography)
  • "Microbial Nitrogen Transformation Potential in Sediments of Two Contrasting Lakes Is Spatially Structured but Seasonally Stable" (2022, mSphere)
  • "Nitrogen removal processes in lakes of different trophic states from on-site measurements and historic data" (2021, Aquatic Sciences)
  • "Net Ecosystem Production of Lakes Estimated From Hypolimnetic Organic Carbon Sinks" (2021, Water Resources Research)
  • "Denitrification and Nitrogen Burial in Swiss Lakes" (2022, Environmental Science & Technology)

Beat Müller collaborates frequently with several co-authors including Alfred Wüest, Kathrin Baumann, Thomas Steinsberger, Cameron M. Callbeck, and Robert Niederdorfer. These collaborations have resulted in multiple joint publications across various topics related to aquatic ecosystems and biogeochemical processes.

Best Publications

  • Effect of procalcitonin-guided treatment on antibiotic use and outcome in lower respiratory tract infections: cluster-randomised, single-blinded intervention trial

    Mirjam Christ-Crain;Daiana Jaccard-Stolz;Roland Bingisser;Mikael M Gencay

  • Procalcitonin guidance of antibiotic therapy in community-acquired pneumonia: a randomized trial.

    Mirjam Christ-Crain;Daiana Stolz;Roland Bingisser;Christian Müller

  • Multipotential Nestin-Positive Stem Cells Isolated From Adult Pancreatic Islets Differentiate Ex Vivo Into Pancreatic Endocrine, Exocrine, and Hepatic Phenotypes

    Henryk Zulewski;Elizabeth J. Abraham;Melissa J. Gerlach;Philip B. Daniel

  • Calcitonin precursors are reliable markers of sepsis in a medical intensive care unit.

    Beat Müller;Kenneth L Becker;Hartmut Schächinger;Peter R. Rickenbacher

  • Antibiotic Treatment of Exacerbations of COPD: A Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing Procalcitonin-Guidance With Standard Therapy

    Daiana Stolz;Mirjam Christ-Crain;Roland Bingisser;Jörg Leuppi

  • Ubiquitous expression of the calcitonin-i gene in multiple tissues in response to sepsis.

    Beat Müller;Jon C. White;Eric S. Nylén;Richard H. Snider

  • Clinical review 167: Procalcitonin and the calcitonin gene family of peptides in inflammation, infection, and sepsis: a journey from calcitonin back to its precursors.

    K. L. Becker;E. S. Nylén;J. C. White;B. Müller

  • Human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells differentiate into insulin, somatostatin, and glucagon expressing cells.

    Katharina Timper;Dalma Seboek;Michael Eberhardt;Philippe Linscheid

  • Diagnostic and prognostic accuracy of clinical and laboratory parameters in community-acquired pneumonia

    Beat Müller;Stephan Harbarth;Daiana Stolz;Roland Bingisser

  • Short-term vs Conventional Glucocorticoid Therapy in Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: The REDUCE Randomized Clinical Trial

    Jörg D. Leuppi;Philipp Schuetz;Roland Bingisser;Michael Bodmer

  • TSH-controlled L-thyroxine therapy reduces cholesterol levels and clinical symptoms in subclinical hypothyroidism: a double blind, placebo-controlled trial (Basel Thyroid Study).

    Christian Meier;Jean-Jacques Staub;Carl-Bénédict Roth;Merih Guglielmetti

  • In Vitro and in Vivo Calcitonin I Gene Expression in Parenchymal Cells: A Novel Product of Human Adipose Tissue

    Philippe Linscheid;Dalma Seboek;Eric S. Nylen;Igor Langer

  • Procalcitonin in bacterial infections--hype, hope, more or less?

    Mirjam Christ-Crain;Beat Müller

  • Mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin as a prognostic marker in sepsis: an observational study

    Mirjam Christ-Crain;Nils G Morgenthaler;Joachim Struck;Stephan Harbarth

  • Estimation of tissue hypothyroidism by a new clinical score: evaluation of patients with various grades of hypothyroidism and controls.

    Henryk Zulewski;Beat Müller;Pascale Exer;André R. Miserez

  • Copeptin, C-Reactive Protein, and Procalcitonin as Prognostic Biomarkers in Acute Exacerbation of COPD

    Daiana Stolz;Mirjam Christ-Crain;Nils G. Morgenthaler;Jörg Leuppi

  • Circulating levels of the long pentraxin PTX3 correlate with severity of infection in critically ill patients.

    Beat Muller;Giuseppe Peri;Andrea Doni;Valter Torri

  • Elevated C-reactive protein and homocysteine values: cardiovascular risk factors in hypothyroidism? A cross-sectional and a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

    Mirjam Christ-Crain;Christian Meier;Merih Guglielmetti;Peter R Huber

  • Expression and secretion of procalcitonin and calcitonin gene-related peptide by adherent monocytes and by macrophage-activated adipocytes*

    Philippe Linscheid;Dalma Seboek;Dominik J. Schaer;Henryk Zulewski

  • Pro-adrenomedullin to predict severity and outcome in community-acquired pneumonia [ISRCTN04176397]

    Mirjam Christ-Crain;Nils G Morgenthaler;Daiana Stolz;Christian Müller

Frequent Co-Authors

Mirjam Christ-Crain
Mirjam Christ-Crain University of Basel
Philipp Schuetz
Philipp Schuetz University of Basel
Alfred Wüest
Alfred Wüest Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology
Nils G. Morgenthaler
Nils G. Morgenthaler Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Michael Tamm
Michael Tamm University Hospital of Basel
Peter C. Hauser
Peter C. Hauser University of Basel
Christian Schindler
Christian Schindler Columbia University
Michael Sturm
Michael Sturm Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology
Martin Schmid
Martin Schmid Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are interested in a career related to medicine but are open to online or alternative pathways, there are several flexible and affordable options worth considering. Many healthcare professionals advance their careers by enrolling in online nursing or nurse practitioner programs, which offer convenient schedules for working students.

For those seeking advanced clinical roles, the cheapest nurse practitioner programs can be a smart way to earn a highly respected credential without breaking the bank. Similarly, affordable nursing programs help prospective nurses enter the field with lower tuition costs.

Current registered nurses looking to move into education or research may consider phd in nursing online programs, which combine flexibility with advanced knowledge. For RNs seeking to expand their career opportunities, exploring rn to bsn online cost can reveal cost-effective ways to earn a Bachelor of Science in Nursing and open doors to leadership positions.

Best Scientists Citing Beat Müller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles