World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
47
Citations
6209
World Ranking
6624
National Ranking
2924

Guy Cote publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Guy Cote sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 150 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Guy Cote D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Guy Cote sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Guy Cote is affiliated with Apple in the United States. Their research profile does not currently include specific publications, frequent co-authors, or documented awards. There is no available information on the scientist's main fields of study, subfields, or primary topics of work.

Details about recent papers, including titles, years of publication, or publication venues, are not present. Similarly, there is no record of frequent publication venues or book publications linked to this individual.

Given the lack of available data concerning scholarly output or research focus, the professional scope and contributions of Guy Cote cannot be further elaborated at this time.

Best Publications

  • H.263+: video coding at low bit rates

    G. Cote;B. Erol;M. Gallant;F. Kossentini

  • Capturing and rendering high dynamic range images

    Garrett M. Johnson;Guy Cote;James Edmund Orr

  • Optimal mode selection and synchronization for robust video communications over error-prone networks

    G. Cote;S. Shirani;F. Kossentini

  • Dual image sensor image processing system and method

    Guy Cote;Jeffrey E. Frederiksen;Joseph P. Bratt;Shun Wai Go

  • System and method for detecting and correcting defective pixels in an image sensor

    Guy Cote;Jeffrey E. Frederiksen

  • System and method for demosaicing image data using weighted gradients

    Guy Côté;Jeffrey E. Frederiksen

  • Method and apparatus for video deinterlacing and format conversion

    Lowell L. Winger;Yunwei Jia;Aaron G. Wells;Elliot N. Linzer

  • Method for improving rate-distortion performance of a video compression system through parallel coefficient cancellation in the transform

    Lowell L. Winger;Pavel Novotny;Guy Cote

  • Programmable quantization dead zone and threshold for standard-based H.264 and/or VC1 video encoding

    Guy Cote;Elliot N. Linzer;Lowell L. Winger

  • Flash synchronization using image sensor interface timing signal

    Guy Cote;Jeffrey E. Frederiksen

  • Systems and method for reducing fixed pattern noise in image data

    Guy Cote;D. Amnon Silverstein;Suk Hwan Lim;Sheng Lin

  • Adaptive reference picture selection based on inter-picture motion measurement

    Simon Booth;Guy Cote

  • Method and apparatus for MPEG-2 to H.264 video transcoding

    Lowell L. Winger;Guy Cote

  • An efficient computation-constrained block-based motion estimation algorithm for low bit rate video coding

    M. Gallant;G. Cote;F. Kossentini

  • Systems and methods for local tone mapping

    Suk Hwan Lim;D. Amnon Silverstein;Guy Cote;Steven David Hordley

  • Overflow control techniques for image signal processing

    Guy Côté;Jeffrey E. Frederiksen

  • Dynamic GOP system and method for digital video encoding

    Luojun Jin;Lowell Winger;Guy Cote

  • Method and/or apparatus for reducing the complexity of non-reference frame encoding using selective reconstruction

    Guy Cote;Michael D. Gallant;Pavel Novotny;Lowell L. Winger

  • Method and/or architecture for motion estimation using integrated information from camera ISP

    José R. Alvarez;Guy Cote

  • Techniques for synchronizing audio and video data in an image signal processing system

    Guy Côté;Jeffrey E. Frederiksen

  • Graphical symbols for H.264 bitstream syntax elements

    Pavel Novotny;Guy Cote;Lowell L. Winger;Simon Booth

Frequent Co-Authors

Graham D. Finlayson
Graham D. Finlayson University of East Anglia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a Computer Science degree in the USA opens up diverse online pathways, from advanced technical fields to quick career-boosting options. Many students consider specialized fields like data science, where finding the cheapest master in data science can offer high value without the heavy financial burden.

For those interested in engineering, the best online electrical engineering programs USA provide the flexibility to learn remotely while gaining a reputable qualification. These programs are well-suited for working professionals and degree-seekers who need to balance study with other commitments.

If you’re looking for a faster route to enter the tech workforce, there are 3-month certificate programs that pay well. Such certifications can help you quickly build in-demand skills and start a new career or enhance your current role.

For a broader graduate degree on a compressed timeline, check out the quickest cheapest masters degree options available online. These paths allow you to gain a recognized credential efficiently, saving you both time and money while boosting your job prospects in tech.

Best Scientists Citing Guy Cote

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles