World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Economics and Finance
UK
2024

D-Index & Metrics

Economics and Finance

D-Index
93
Citations
42162
World Ranking
151
National Ranking
17

Nick Hanley publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Economics and Finance in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nick Hanley sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 1 scientists 47–51 publications: 12 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 23 scientists 62–66 publications: 32 scientists 67–71 publications: 36 scientists 72–76 publications: 56 scientists 77–81 publications: 57 scientists 82–86 publications: 70 scientists 87–91 publications: 86 scientists 92–96 publications: 72 scientists 97–101 publications: 106 scientists 102–106 publications: 97 scientists 107–111 publications: 96 scientists 112–116 publications: 101 scientists 117–121 publications: 103 scientists 122–126 publications: 102 scientists 127–131 publications: 108 scientists 132–136 publications: 107 scientists 137–141 publications: 111 scientists 142–146 publications: 94 scientists 147–151 publications: 96 scientists 152–156 publications: 100 scientists 157–161 publications: 74 scientists 162–166 publications: 68 scientists 167–171 publications: 91 scientists 172–176 publications: 76 scientists 177–181 publications: 75 scientists 182–186 publications: 61 scientists 187–191 publications: 66 scientists 192–196 publications: 68 scientists 197–201 publications: 71 scientists 202–206 publications: 60 scientists 207–211 publications: 56 scientists 212–216 publications: 44 scientists 217–221 publications: 51 scientists 222–226 publications: 65 scientists 227–231 publications: 48 scientists 232–236 publications: 59 scientists 237–241 publications: 37 scientists 242–246 publications: 37 scientists 247–251 publications: 41 scientists 252–256 publications: 43 scientists 257–261 publications: 33 scientists 262–266 publications: 34 scientists 267–271 publications: 39 scientists 272–276 publications: 25 scientists 277–281 publications: 29 scientists 282–286 publications: 29 scientists 287–291 publications: 26 scientists 292–296 publications: 31 scientists 297–301 publications: 31 scientists 302–306 publications: 24 scientists 307–311 publications: 28 scientists 312–316 publications: 24 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 14 scientists 327–331 publications: 25 scientists 332–336 publications: 18 scientists 337–341 publications: 16 scientists 342–346 publications: 18 scientists 347–351 publications: 15 scientists 352–356 publications: 17 scientists 357–361 publications: 19 scientists 362–366 publications: 16 scientists 367–371 publications: 17 scientists 372–376 publications: 7 scientists 377–381 publications: 18 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 19 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 13 scientists 407–411 publications: 13 scientists 412–416 publications: 5 scientists 417–421 publications: 10 scientists 422–426 publications: 6 scientists 427–431 publications: 12 scientists 432–436 publications: 9 scientists 437–441 publications: 9 scientists 442–446 publications: 10 scientists 447–451 publications: 12 scientists 452–456 publications: 8 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 5 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 7 scientists 487–491 publications: 8 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 4 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 7 scientists 517–520 publications: 7 scientists 521+ publications: 99 scientists
42 publications 521+

This scientist: 540 publications — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more.

Nick Hanley D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nick Hanley sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 126 scientists 31 D-Index: 147 scientists 32 D-Index: 157 scientists 33 D-Index: 178 scientists 34 D-Index: 171 scientists 35 D-Index: 141 scientists 36 D-Index: 132 scientists 37 D-Index: 129 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 120 scientists 40 D-Index: 117 scientists 41 D-Index: 113 scientists 42 D-Index: 114 scientists 43 D-Index: 97 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 86 scientists 46 D-Index: 78 scientists 47 D-Index: 83 scientists 48 D-Index: 62 scientists 49 D-Index: 74 scientists 50 D-Index: 50 scientists 51 D-Index: 66 scientists 52 D-Index: 69 scientists 53 D-Index: 55 scientists 54 D-Index: 67 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 62 scientists 57 D-Index: 45 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 47 scientists 60 D-Index: 46 scientists 61 D-Index: 36 scientists 62 D-Index: 37 scientists 63 D-Index: 56 scientists 64 D-Index: 50 scientists 65 D-Index: 32 scientists 66 D-Index: 28 scientists 67 D-Index: 30 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 25 scientists 70 D-Index: 22 scientists 71 D-Index: 21 scientists 72 D-Index: 26 scientists 73 D-Index: 24 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 12 scientists 76 D-Index: 14 scientists 77 D-Index: 15 scientists 78 D-Index: 15 scientists 79 D-Index: 17 scientists 80 D-Index: 17 scientists 81 D-Index: 11 scientists 82 D-Index: 10 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 11 scientists 85 D-Index: 5 scientists 86 D-Index: 9 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 9 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 6 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 8 scientists 93 D-Index: 10 scientists 94 D-Index: 11 scientists 95 D-Index: 6 scientists 96 D-Index: 4 scientists 97 D-Index: 4 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100 D-Index: 8 scientists 101+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 101+

This scientist: 93 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2024 - Research.com Economics and Finance in United Kingdom Leader Award

Overview

Nick Hanley is affiliated with the University of Glasgow in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science and economics, econometrics, and finance, with significant contributions to the intersections of these fields.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Environmental Science
  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance

The subfields in which they have published include:

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
  • Agronomy and Crop Science

The main topics covered in their research are:

  • Economic and Environmental Valuation
  • Urban Green Space and Health
  • Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Environmental Conservation and Management
  • Forest Management and Policy
  • Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Environmental Education and Sustainability

Nick Hanley's frequent co-authors include:

  • Katherine Simpson
  • Frans P. de Vries
  • Mikołaj Czajkowski
  • Craig McDougall
  • Richard S. Quilliam

They have contributed regularly to several publication venues, notably:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Ecological Economics
  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Landscape and Urban Planning
  • Land Use Policy

Recent papers by Nick Hanley include:

  • Freshwater blue space and population health: An emerging research agenda (2020), published in The Science of The Total Environment
  • Neighbourhood blue space and mental health: A nationwide ecological study of antidepressant medication prescribed to older adults (2021), published in Landscape and Urban Planning
  • Spatial Coordination Incentives for landscape-scale environmental management: A systematic review (2021), published in Land Use Policy
  • Blue space exposure, health and well-being: Does freshwater type matter? (2022), published in Landscape and Urban Planning
  • The Effect of Forest Management Options on Forest Resilience to Pathogens (2020), published in Frontiers in Forests and Global Change

Best Publications

  • Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques: a Manual

    Ian J. Bateman;Richard T. Carson;Brett Day;W. Michael Hanemann

  • Cost-benefit analysis and the environment

    Nick D. Hanley;Clive L. Spash

  • Economic Valuation With Stated Preference Techniques

    Ian Bateman;Richard Carson;Brett Day;Michael Hanemann

  • Environmental Economics: In Theory and Practice

    Nick D. Hanley;Jason F. Shogren;Ben White

  • Driving improvements in emerging disease surveillance through locally relevant capacity strengthening.

    Jo E. B. Halliday;Katie Hampson;Nick Hanley;Tiziana Lembo

  • Choice modelling approaches: a superior alternative for environmental valuation?

    Nick Hanley;Susana Mourato;Robert E. Wright

  • USING CHOICE EXPERIMENTS TO VALUE THE ENVIRONMENT

    Nick Hanley;Robert E. Wright;Vic Adamowicz

  • Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies

    Robert J. Johnston;Kevin J. Boyle;Wiktor Adamowicz;Jeff Bennett

  • Pricing Nature: Cost-Benefit Analysis and Environmental Policy

    Nick D. Hanley;Edward Barbier

  • Introduction to Environmental Economics

    Nick D. Hanley;Jason F. Shogren;Ben White

  • Valuing the attributes of renewable energy investments

    Ariel Bergmann;Nick Hanley;Robert Wright

  • Contingent Valuation versus Choice Experiments : Estimating the Benefits of Environmentally Sensitive Areas in Scotland

    Nick Hanley;Douglas C. MacMillan;Robert E. Wright;Craig Bullock

  • Preferences, information and biodiversity preservation

    Clive L. Spash;Nick Hanley

  • Valuing the diversity of biodiversity

    Mike Christie;Nick Hanley;John Warren;Kevin Murphy

  • Validity and reliability

    Ian J. Bateman;Richard T. Carson;Brett Day;Michael Hanemann

  • Using conjoint analysis to quantify public preferences over the environmental impacts of wind farms. An example from Spain

    Begoña Álvarez-Farizo;Nick Hanley

  • Estimating the Economic Value of Improvements in River Ecology Using Choice Experiments: An application to the water framework directive

    Nick Hanley;Robert E. Wright;Begona Alvarez-Farizo

  • Measuring sustainability: A time series of alternative indicators for Scotland

    Nicholas Hanley;Ian Moffatt;Robin Faichney;Michael Wilson

  • Aggregating the benefits of environmental improvements: distance-decay functions for use and non-use values.

    Nick Hanley;Felix Schläpfer;James Spurgeon

  • Modelling recreation demand using choice experiments: Climbing in Scotland

    Nick Hanley;Robert E. Wright;Gary Koop

Frequent Co-Authors

Mikolaj Czajkowski
Mikolaj Czajkowski University of Warsaw
Paul R. Armsworth
Paul R. Armsworth University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Robert E. Wright
Robert E. Wright University of Glasgow
Martin Dallimer
Martin Dallimer University of Leeds
Douglas C. MacMillan
Douglas C. MacMillan University of Kent
Jason F. Shogren
Jason F. Shogren University of Wyoming
Kevin J. Gaston
Kevin J. Gaston University of Exeter
Ian J. Bateman
Ian J. Bateman University of Exeter
Clive L. Spash
Clive L. Spash Vienna University of Economics and Business
Graham Loomes
Graham Loomes University of Warwick

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Economics and Finance in the USA opens doors to a wide range of online programs and career routes. Many students choose to broaden their leadership potential by exploring the best masters in leadership programs, which develop skills valuable for management and executive positions.

Those interested in harnessing data for strategic insights may consider an online business intelligence degree. This pathway is ideal for careers in analytics, market research, or financial consulting.

For students seeking flexibility, several universities offer an online mba no gmat required, allowing professionals to advance their business expertise without standardized test barriers.

Affordability is another key factor. You can find a reputable mba under 35k, making further education in economics and finance more accessible.

With these options, students and professionals can tailor their learning to their career ambitions, combining economic and financial expertise with emerging skills in leadership and analytics.

Best Scientists Citing Nick Hanley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles