World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Douglas C. MacMillan

Douglas C. MacMillan

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
45
Citations
6999
World Ranking
6465
National Ranking
506

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
45
Citations
6987
World Ranking
3936
National Ranking
670

Douglas C. MacMillan publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Douglas C. MacMillan sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 138 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Douglas C. MacMillan D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Douglas C. MacMillan sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Douglas C. MacMillan is affiliated with the University of Kent in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple fields including Arts and Humanities and Medicine, with a focus on subfields such as Music, Cancer Research, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Surgery, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

Their work covers several main topics:

  • Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
  • Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
  • Breast Implant and Reconstruction
  • Musicology and Musical Analysis
  • Theater, Performance, and Music History
  • Diversity and Impact of Dance
  • Diverse Musicological Studies

Douglas C. MacMillan has authored a number of recent papers, including:

  • "Axillary sentinel lymph node identification using superparamagnetic iron oxide versus radioisotope in early stage breast cancer: The UK SentiMag trial (SMART study)" published in 2022 in The Surgeon
  • "The Flageolet: A Woodwind Instrument that Transcended Social Class and Gender in Nineteenth-Century England" published in 2020 in Nineteenth-Century Music Review

Frequent co-authors in their work include:

  • Raghavan Vidya
  • Muskaan Khosla
  • Siobhan Laws
  • James Harvey
  • Monika Kaushik

Douglas C. MacMillan has also contributed to book publications, notably with Boydell and Brewer eBooks. One such publication is "The Flageolet in England, 1660-1914," released in 2020.

Their frequent publication venues are:

  • The Surgeon
  • Nineteenth-Century Music Review

Best Publications

  • Contingent Valuation versus Choice Experiments : Estimating the Benefits of Environmentally Sensitive Areas in Scotland

    Nick Hanley;Douglas C. MacMillan;Robert E. Wright;Craig Bullock

  • Poaching is more than an Enforcement Problem

    Daniel W. S. Challender;Douglas C. MacMillan

  • Toward a systematic approach for identifying conservation flagships

    Diogo Verissimo;Douglas C. MacMillan;Robert J. Smith

  • Understanding markets to conserve trade-threatened species in CITES

    Daniel W.S. Challender;Stuart R. Harrop;Douglas C. MacMillan

  • Valuing the non-market benefits of wild goose conservation: a comparison of interview and group-based approaches

    Douglas Craig MacMillan;Lorna Jennifer Philip;N. Hanley;B. Alvarez-Farizo

  • Contingent valuation: Environmental polling or preference engine?

    Douglas C. MacMillan;Nick Hanley;Nele Lienhoop

  • Towards informed and multi-faceted wildlife trade interventions

    Daniel W.S. Challender;Stuart R. Harrop;Douglas C. MacMillan

  • The Delphi process - an expert-based approach to ecological modelling in data-poor environments

    Douglas C. MacMillan;K. Marshall

  • Understanding heterogeneous preference of tourists for big game species: implications for conservation and management

    E. Di Minin;E. Di Minin;Iain Fraser;Iain Fraser;Rob Slotow;Douglas C. MacMillan

  • Birds as tourism flagship species: a case study of tropical islands

    Diogo Veríssimo;Iain M Fraser;Jim J. Groombridge;Rachel M. Bristol

  • Increased conservation marketing effort has major fundraising benefits for even the least popular species

    Diogo Veríssimo;Diogo Veríssimo;Greg Vaughan;Martin S. Ridout;Carly Waterman

  • Understanding Urban Demand for Wild Meat in Vietnam: Implications for Conservation Actions

    Rachel Shairp;Diogo Verissimo;Iain Fraser;Daniel Challender

  • Valuing wilderness in Iceland: Estimation of WTA and WTP using the market stall approach to contingent valuation

    Nele Lienhoop;Douglas C. MacMillan

  • Synergies for improving oil palm production and forest conservation in floodplain landscapes.

    Nicola K. Abram;Panteleimon Xofis;Joseph Tzanopoulos;Douglas C. MacMillan

  • Cost-effectiveness analysis of woodland ecosystem restoration

    Douglas C. Macmillan;David Harley;Ruth Morrison

  • Toward Human-Carnivore Coexistence: Understanding Tolerance for Tigers in Bangladesh

    Chloe Inskip;Neil Carter;Shawn Riley;Thomas Roberts

  • Economics and the design of nature conservation policy: a case study of wild goose conservation in Scotland using choice experiments

    Nick Hanley;Douglas C. MacMillan;Ian Patterson;Robert E. Wright

  • Human–Tiger Conflict in Context: Risks to Lives and Livelihoods in the Bangladesh Sundarbans

    Chloe Inskip;Martin Ridout;Zubair Fahad;Rowan Tully

  • Payments for ecosystem services and rural development: Landowners' preferences and potential participation in western Mexico

    Arturo Balderas Torres;Arturo Balderas Torres;D.C. MacMillan;Margaret Skutsch;Margaret Skutsch;Jonathan Cranidge Lovett;Jonathan Cranidge Lovett

  • Costs and benefits of wild goose conservation in Scotland

    Douglas Craig MacMillan;N. Hanley;Michael E Daw

Frequent Co-Authors

Nick Hanley
Nick Hanley University of Glasgow
Diogo Veríssimo
Diogo Veríssimo University of Oxford
Robert J. Smith
Robert J. Smith University of Kent
Joseph Tzanopoulos
Joseph Tzanopoulos University of Kent
Jon C. Lovett
Jon C. Lovett University of Leeds
Iain Fraser
Iain Fraser University of Kent
Margaret Skutsch
Margaret Skutsch National Autonomous University of Mexico
Robert E. Wright
Robert E. Wright University of Glasgow
Andrew T. Knight
Andrew T. Knight Imperial College London
Stephen T. Buckland
Stephen T. Buckland University of St Andrews

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Social Sciences and Humanities offers flexibility and numerous career opportunities. One in-demand option is pursuing psy d programs, which prepare graduates for advanced roles in psychology, counseling, or clinical settings.

For those interested in helping couples and families, accelerated marriage and family therapy programs provide a fast track to becoming a licensed therapist. These programs are designed for students seeking efficient and focused preparation for rewarding careers in therapy.

If affordability is a key concern, there are cheap psychology masters programs that make higher education more accessible without sacrificing quality. These programs are ideal for budget-conscious students aiming to gain specialized psychological skills or advance in educational or social services roles.

Leadership positions in education are also attainable through edd online programs, which offer fast-track pathways for professionals ready to drive educational innovation.

Each of these degree paths enables students to specialize, advance their careers, and serve their communities—all through flexible online learning.

Best Scientists Citing Douglas C. MacMillan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles