World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
VIEW LIST
Mikolaj Czajkowski

Mikolaj Czajkowski

University of Warsaw
Poland

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Economics and Finance 44 1886 1699 3 3 206 5552

Mikolaj Czajkowski publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mikolaj Czajkowski between 1980 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mikolaj Czajkowski published across 46 years, from 1980 to 2025, averaging 5.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 30 publications in 2017. 25 of the 235 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 30. Peak 30 publications in 2017. 1980: 1 publication 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 0 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 25 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 30 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 12 publications
1980 2025

235 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mikolaj Czajkowski: publications per year, 1980 to 2025
Year Publications
1980 1
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 1
2004 1
2005 0
2006 2
2007 3
2008 3
2009 2
2010 5
2011 3
2012 12
2013 9
2014 16
2015 25
2016 18
2017 30
2018 16
2019 16
2020 14
2021 14
2022 8
2023 11
2024 13
2025 12
Total 235
Download as CSV

Mikolaj Czajkowski publications per year - data summary

  • Mikolaj Czajkowski, a Economics and Finance scholar from University of Warsaw, has 235 publications recorded across 46 years, from 1980 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1980 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2017, with 30 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1980, 2003 and 2004, with 1 publication each.
  • 23 of the 46 years in the span carry no publications at all (1981, 1982, 1983, 1984 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 5.1 papers per year over the whole span, or 10.2 per year counting only the 23 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 58 publications, 25% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1980-1995: 1 publication (0.1 per year); 1996-2011: 20 publications (1.3 per year); 2012-2025: 214 publications (15.3 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Mikolaj Czajkowski publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Economics and Finance in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mikolaj Czajkowski sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 42–46 to 521+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 111. Most scientists, 111, have 137–141 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 202–206 publications, is where this scientist sits. 42–46 publications: 1 scientist 47–51 publications: 12 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 23 scientists 62–66 publications: 32 scientists 67–71 publications: 36 scientists 72–76 publications: 56 scientists 77–81 publications: 57 scientists 82–86 publications: 70 scientists 87–91 publications: 86 scientists 92–96 publications: 72 scientists 97–101 publications: 106 scientists 102–106 publications: 97 scientists 107–111 publications: 96 scientists 112–116 publications: 101 scientists 117–121 publications: 103 scientists 122–126 publications: 102 scientists 127–131 publications: 108 scientists 132–136 publications: 107 scientists 137–141 publications: 111 scientists 142–146 publications: 94 scientists 147–151 publications: 96 scientists 152–156 publications: 100 scientists 157–161 publications: 74 scientists 162–166 publications: 68 scientists 167–171 publications: 91 scientists 172–176 publications: 76 scientists 177–181 publications: 75 scientists 182–186 publications: 61 scientists 187–191 publications: 66 scientists 192–196 publications: 68 scientists 197–201 publications: 71 scientists 202–206 publications: 60 scientists 207–211 publications: 56 scientists 212–216 publications: 44 scientists 217–221 publications: 51 scientists 222–226 publications: 65 scientists 227–231 publications: 48 scientists 232–236 publications: 59 scientists 237–241 publications: 37 scientists 242–246 publications: 37 scientists 247–251 publications: 41 scientists 252–256 publications: 43 scientists 257–261 publications: 33 scientists 262–266 publications: 34 scientists 267–271 publications: 39 scientists 272–276 publications: 25 scientists 277–281 publications: 29 scientists 282–286 publications: 29 scientists 287–291 publications: 26 scientists 292–296 publications: 31 scientists 297–301 publications: 31 scientists 302–306 publications: 24 scientists 307–311 publications: 28 scientists 312–316 publications: 24 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 14 scientists 327–331 publications: 25 scientists 332–336 publications: 18 scientists 337–341 publications: 16 scientists 342–346 publications: 18 scientists 347–351 publications: 15 scientists 352–356 publications: 17 scientists 357–361 publications: 19 scientists 362–366 publications: 16 scientists 367–371 publications: 17 scientists 372–376 publications: 7 scientists 377–381 publications: 18 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 19 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 13 scientists 407–411 publications: 13 scientists 412–416 publications: 5 scientists 417–421 publications: 10 scientists 422–426 publications: 6 scientists 427–431 publications: 12 scientists 432–436 publications: 9 scientists 437–441 publications: 9 scientists 442–446 publications: 10 scientists 447–451 publications: 12 scientists 452–456 publications: 8 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 5 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 7 scientists 487–491 publications: 8 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 4 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 7 scientists 517–520 publications: 7 scientists 521+ publications: 99 scientists
42–46 publications 521+

This scientist: 206 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Economics and Finance scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,760 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
42–46 1
47–51 12
52–56 7
57–61 23
62–66 32
67–71 36
72–76 56
77–81 57
82–86 70
87–91 86
92–96 72
97–101 106
102–106 97
107–111 96
112–116 101
117–121 103
122–126 102
127–131 108
132–136 107
137–141 111
142–146 94
147–151 96
152–156 100
157–161 74
162–166 68
167–171 91
172–176 76
177–181 75
182–186 61
187–191 66
192–196 68
197–201 71
202–206 60 206
207–211 56
212–216 44
217–221 51
222–226 65
227–231 48
232–236 59
237–241 37
242–246 37
247–251 41
252–256 43
257–261 33
262–266 34
267–271 39
272–276 25
277–281 29
282–286 29
287–291 26
292–296 31
297–301 31
302–306 24
307–311 28
312–316 24
317–321 13
322–326 14
327–331 25
332–336 18
337–341 16
342–346 18
347–351 15
352–356 17
357–361 19
362–366 16
367–371 17
372–376 7
377–381 18
382–386 13
387–391 19
392–396 9
397–401 10
402–406 13
407–411 13
412–416 5
417–421 10
422–426 6
427–431 12
432–436 9
437–441 9
442–446 10
447–451 12
452–456 8
457–461 4
462–466 7
467–471 4
472–476 5
477–481 6
482–486 7
487–491 8
492–496 5
497–501 4
502–506 4
507–511 5
512–516 7
517–520 7
521+ 99
Download as CSV

Mikolaj Czajkowski publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 3,760 Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 97 ranges running from 42–46 to 521+ publications.
  • Mikolaj Czajkowski, a Economics and Finance scholar from University of Warsaw, records 206 publications - the 63rd percentile of the discipline.
  • 63% of ranked Economics and Finance scientists score the same or lower than Mikolaj Czajkowski, and about 37% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 167–171 publications range, and Mikolaj Czajkowski ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 137–141 publications, holding 111 scientists (3% of the field).
  • 48% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 162–166 publications), so the distribution leans towards the lower end of the scale.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 521 publications or more, 99 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Mikolaj Czajkowski D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mikolaj Czajkowski sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 72 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 101+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 178. Most scientists, 178, have 33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 126 scientists 31 D-Index: 147 scientists 32 D-Index: 157 scientists 33 D-Index: 178 scientists 34 D-Index: 171 scientists 35 D-Index: 141 scientists 36 D-Index: 132 scientists 37 D-Index: 129 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 120 scientists 40 D-Index: 117 scientists 41 D-Index: 113 scientists 42 D-Index: 114 scientists 43 D-Index: 97 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 86 scientists 46 D-Index: 78 scientists 47 D-Index: 83 scientists 48 D-Index: 62 scientists 49 D-Index: 74 scientists 50 D-Index: 50 scientists 51 D-Index: 66 scientists 52 D-Index: 69 scientists 53 D-Index: 55 scientists 54 D-Index: 67 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 62 scientists 57 D-Index: 45 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 47 scientists 60 D-Index: 46 scientists 61 D-Index: 36 scientists 62 D-Index: 37 scientists 63 D-Index: 56 scientists 64 D-Index: 50 scientists 65 D-Index: 32 scientists 66 D-Index: 28 scientists 67 D-Index: 30 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 25 scientists 70 D-Index: 22 scientists 71 D-Index: 21 scientists 72 D-Index: 26 scientists 73 D-Index: 24 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 12 scientists 76 D-Index: 14 scientists 77 D-Index: 15 scientists 78 D-Index: 15 scientists 79 D-Index: 17 scientists 80 D-Index: 17 scientists 81 D-Index: 11 scientists 82 D-Index: 10 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 11 scientists 85 D-Index: 5 scientists 86 D-Index: 9 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 9 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 6 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 8 scientists 93 D-Index: 10 scientists 94 D-Index: 11 scientists 95 D-Index: 6 scientists 96 D-Index: 4 scientists 97 D-Index: 4 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100 D-Index: 8 scientists 101+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 101+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Economics and Finance scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,760 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 126
31 147
32 157
33 178
34 171
35 141
36 132
37 129
38 130
39 120
40 117
41 113
42 114
43 97
44 115 44
45 86
46 78
47 83
48 62
49 74
50 50
51 66
52 69
53 55
54 67
55 61
56 62
57 45
58 34
59 47
60 46
61 36
62 37
63 56
64 50
65 32
66 28
67 30
68 24
69 25
70 22
71 21
72 26
73 24
74 23
75 12
76 14
77 15
78 15
79 17
80 17
81 11
82 10
83 16
84 11
85 5
86 9
87 13
88 9
89 7
90 6
91 4
92 8
93 10
94 11
95 6
96 4
97 4
98 6
99 6
100 8
101+ 100
Download as CSV

Mikolaj Czajkowski D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 3,760 Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 72 ranges running from 30 to 101+ D-Index.
  • Mikolaj Czajkowski, a Economics and Finance scholar from University of Warsaw, records 44 D-Index - the 53rd percentile of the discipline.
  • 53% of ranked Economics and Finance scientists score the same or lower than Mikolaj Czajkowski, and about 47% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 44 D-Index range, and Mikolaj Czajkowski falls inside that same range.
  • The most crowded range is 33 D-Index, holding 178 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 59% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 47 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more, 100 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Overview

Mikolaj Czajkowski is affiliated with the University of Warsaw in Poland and works primarily within the field of Economics, Econometrics, and Finance. Their research focuses on topics related to economic and environmental valuation, decision-making and behavioral economics, and environmental sustainability. The scope of their work also extends to environmental education and sustainability, environmental sustainability in business, economics of agriculture and food markets, housing market and economics, and consumer market behavior and pricing.

Their publication record includes contributions to various journals and venues, with frequent publications in:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Ecological Economics
  • Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy
  • Journal of Agricultural Economics
  • Working Papers.

Czajkowski has published several notable research papers, including:

  • "Environmental attitudes and place identity as determinants of preferences for ecosystem services" (2020) in Ecological Economics
  • "Farmers' risk preferences in 11 European farming systems: A multi-country replication of Bocquého et al. (2014)" (2022) in Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy
  • "Using farmers' ex ante preferences to design agri-environmental contracts: A systematic review" (2023) in Journal of Agricultural Economics
  • "Trade-offs in the transition to a blue economy - Mapping social acceptance of aquaculture expansion in Norway" (2022) in The Science of The Total Environment
  • "An economic valuation of access to cultural institutions: museums, theatres, and cinemas" (2020) in Journal of Cultural Economics

Books authored by Czajkowski include titles published by Springer International Publishing, White Rose University Consortium, and Technische Universität Berlin - Universitätsbibliothek. Notable books include:

  • Environmental Valuation with Discrete Choice Experiments (2020) - Springer International Publishing
  • Environmental Valuation with Discrete Choice Experiments: Guidance on Design, Implementation and Data Analysis (2020) - White Rose University Consortium
  • Environmental valuation with discrete choice experiments (2020) - Technische Universität Berlin - Universitätsbibliothek

Czajkowski frequently collaborates with a group of co-authors including Julian Sagebiel, Klaus Glenk, Thijs Dekker, Katarzyna Zagórska, and Petr Mariel. The extent of collaboration is notable, with multiple joint publications involving these colleagues.

Best Publications

  • Economic valuation of air pollution mortality: A 9-country contingent valuation survey of value of a life year (VOLY)

    B. Desaigues;D. Ami;A. Bartczak;M. Braun-Kohlová

  • Social Norms, Morals and Self-interest as Determinants of Pro-environment Behaviours: The Case of Household Recycling

    Mikołaj Czajkowski;Nick Hanley;Karine Nyborg

  • Environmental Valuation with Discrete Choice Experiments

    Unknown

  • The discrete choice experiment approach to environmental contingent valuation

    Richard Carson;Mikolaj Czajkowski

  • We want to sort! - assessing households' preferences for sorting waste

    Mikołaj Czajkowski;Tadeusz Kądziela;Nick Hanley

  • The value of familiarity: Effects of knowledge and objective signals on willingness to pay for a public good

    Jacob LaRiviere;Mikołaj Czajkowski;Nick Hanley;Margrethe Aanesen

  • Valuing Changes in Forest Biodiversity

    Mikolaj Czajkowski;Malgorzata Buszko-Briggs;Nicholas Hanley

  • Spatial Heterogeneity of Willingness to Pay for Forest Management

    Mikołaj Czajkowski;Wiktor Budziński;Danny Campbell;Marek Giergiczny

  • Willingness to pay for unfamiliar public goods: Preserving cold-water coral in Norway

    Margrethe Aanesen;Claire Armstrong;Mikołaj Czajkowski;Jannike Falk-Petersen

  • Learning and Fatigue Effects Revisited: Investigating the Effects of Accounting for Unobservable Preference and Scale Heterogeneity

    Mikolaj Czajkowski;Marek Giergiczny;William H. Greene

  • Environmental attitudes and place identity as determinants of preferences for ecosystem services

    Michela Faccioli;Michela Faccioli;Mikołaj Czajkowski;Mikołaj Czajkowski;Klaus Glenk;Julia Martin-Ortega

  • Choice experiment assessment of public preferences for forest structural attributes.

    Marek Giergiczny;Mikołaj Czajkowski;Tomasz Żylicz;Per Angelstam

  • Simulation error in maximum likelihood estimation of discrete choice models

    Mikołaj Czajkowski;Wiktor Budziński

  • The Role of Stated Preference Valuation Methods in Understanding Choices and Informing Policy

    Nick Hanley;Mikołaj Czajkowski

  • Benefits of meeting nutrient reduction targets for the Baltic Sea – a contingent valuation study in the nine coastal states

    Heini Ahtiainen;Janne Artell;Mikolaj Czajkowski;Berit Hasler

  • The economic recreational value of a white stork nesting colony: A case of ‘stork village’ in Poland

    Mikołaj Czajkowski;Marek Giergiczny;Jakub Kronenberg;Piotr Tryjanowski

  • The Effects of Experience on Preferences: Theory and Empirics for Environmental Public Goods

    Mikolaj Czajkowski;Nicholas David Hanley;Jacob LaRiviere

  • Using Labels to Investigate Scope Effects in Stated Preference Methods

    Mikolaj Czajkowski;Nicholas Hanley

  • Environmental Valuation with Discrete Choice Experiments: Guidance on Design, Implementation and Data Analysis

    Petr Mariel;David Hoyos;Jürgen Meyerhoff;Mikolaj Czajkowski

  • Reduction of Baltic Sea Nutrient Inputs and Allocation of Abatement Costs Within the Baltic Sea Catchment

    Frederik Wulff;Christoph Humborg;Hans Estrup Andersen;Gitte Blicher-Mathiesen

  • Controlling for the Effects of Information in a Public Goods Discrete Choice Model

    Mikolaj Czajkowski;Nicholas David Hanley;Jacob LaRiviere

  • Social norm nudging and preferences for household recycling

    Mikołaj Czajkowski;Mikołaj Czajkowski;Katarzyna Zagórska;Nick Hanley

  • Social norms, morals and self-interest as determinants of pro-environment behaviours

    Mikolaj Czajkowski;Nicholas Hanley;Karine Nyborg

  • Environmental valuation with discrete choice experiments

    Petr Mariel;David Hoyos;Jürgen Meyerhoff;Mikolaj Czajkowski

Frequent Co-Authors

Nick Hanley
Nick Hanley University of Glasgow
Jürgen Meyerhoff
Jürgen Meyerhoff Berlin School of Economics and Law
Søren Bøye Olsen
Søren Bøye Olsen University of Copenhagen
Per Angelstam
Per Angelstam Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences
Marine Elbakidze
Marine Elbakidze Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Ståle Navrud
Ståle Navrud Norwegian University of Life Sciences
Piotr Tryjanowski
Piotr Tryjanowski University of Life Sciences in Poznań
Christoph Humborg
Christoph Humborg Stockholm University
Richard T. Carson
Richard T. Carson University of California, San Diego
Anke Fischer
Anke Fischer Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences

External Links

Personal website of Mikolaj Czajkowski

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Economics and Finance opens doors to a wide range of online degrees and career pathways in the USA. Many students and professionals begin by strengthening their foundational skills through bookkeeping certification, which is ideal for understanding business transactions and building a career in accounting.

For those interested in a broader administrative role, an online associate of applied science in administration can lead to support and management opportunities across public and private sectors. This credential develops skills in office coordination, communication, and basic finance tasks.

If your interests lean toward people management and organizational strategy, consider a masters in human resources online to advance your expertise in recruiting, workforce planning, and employee relations—key skills required by today’s competitive employers.

Additionally, as organizations increasingly prioritize data-driven decision making, professionals with advanced data skills are in high demand. Pursuing one of the best online data analytics master's programs can help you master tools to analyze financial trends and guide strategic planning.

Best Scientists Citing Mikolaj Czajkowski

Nick Hanley

Nick Hanley

University of Glasgow

Publications: 39

Jürgen Meyerhoff

Jürgen Meyerhoff

Berlin School of Economics and Law

Publications: 20

Bo G. Gustafsson

Bo G. Gustafsson

Stockholm University

Publications: 14

Robert J. Johnston

Robert J. Johnston

Clark University

Publications: 13

John Rolfe

John Rolfe

Central Queensland University

Publications: 11

Riccardo Scarpa

Riccardo Scarpa

Durham University

Publications: 11

Søren Bøye Olsen

Søren Bøye Olsen

University of Copenhagen

Publications: 11

Per Angelstam

Per Angelstam

Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences

Publications: 10

E. J. Milner-Gulland

E. J. Milner-Gulland

University of Oxford

Publications: 10

Bo Jellesmark Thorsen

Bo Jellesmark Thorsen

University of Copenhagen

Publications: 9

Thorsten B.H. Reusch

Thorsten B.H. Reusch

GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel

Publications: 9

Henn Ojaveer

Henn Ojaveer

University of Tartu

Publications: 9

Per R. Jonsson

Per R. Jonsson

Stockholm University

Publications: 9

Ing-Marie Gren

Ing-Marie Gren

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences

Publications: 8

Mette Termansen

Mette Termansen

University of Copenhagen

Publications: 8

Jørgen E. Olesen

Jørgen E. Olesen

Aarhus University

Publications: 7

Trending Scientists

Eicke R. Weber

Eicke R. Weber

University of California, Berkeley

Ellen J. MacKenzie

Ellen J. MacKenzie

Johns Hopkins University

William R. Lovallo

William R. Lovallo

Veterans Health Administration

Sergij Goerdt

Sergij Goerdt

Heidelberg University

Anindya Dutta

Anindya Dutta

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Sandra Amor

Sandra Amor

University of Amsterdam

Geert Leroux-Roels

Geert Leroux-Roels

Ghent University

Alberto Bacchelli

Alberto Bacchelli

University of Zurich

Santiago V. Luis

Santiago V. Luis

Jaume I University

Eric V. Anslyn

Eric V. Anslyn

The University of Texas at Austin

James J. McAndrews

James J. McAndrews

University of Pennsylvania

Zhang Wu

Zhang Wu

Nanyang Technological University

Xavier Bonnet

Xavier Bonnet

Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS

Philip L. Munday

Philip L. Munday

James Cook University

William Q. Judge

William Q. Judge

Old Dominion University

Francis A Kulacki

Francis A Kulacki

University of Minnesota

Related Economics and Finance Rankings & Guides

2027 Accounting Schools in Florida – How to Become a CPA in FL

2027 Accounting Schools in Florida – How to Become a CPA in FL
2026 Best Accounting Degree Programs Ranking in Houston

2026 Best Accounting Degree Programs Ranking in Houston
2027 How Fast Can You Get an Accounting Degree Online?

2027 How Fast Can You Get an Accounting Degree Online?
2026 Best Online Accounting Degree Programs Ranking in California

2026 Best Online Accounting Degree Programs Ranking in California
2026 Most Affordable Online Master's in MBA Degree Programs Ranking in North Carolina

2026 Most Affordable Online Master's in MBA Degree Programs Ranking in North Carolina
2026 Fastest Online Bachelor's in Human Resources Degree Programs Ranking in Colorado

2026 Fastest Online Bachelor's in Human Resources Degree Programs Ranking in Colorado
2026 Fastest Online Finance Degree Programs Ranking in Texas

2026 Fastest Online Finance Degree Programs Ranking in Texas
Most Affordable Accounting Associate Degree Programs - Budget-Friendly Accounting Schools in Oregon for 2026

Most Affordable Accounting Associate Degree Programs - Budget-Friendly Accounting Schools in Oregon for 2026
2026 Most Affordable Online Master's in Finance Degree Programs Ranking in Pennsylvania

2026 Most Affordable Online Master's in Finance Degree Programs Ranking in Pennsylvania
2027 Fastest Online Forensic Accounting Degree Programs

2027 Fastest Online Forensic Accounting Degree Programs
2026 Fastest Online Bachelor's in Business Degree Programs Ranking in the USA

2026 Fastest Online Bachelor's in Business Degree Programs Ranking in the USA
2026 Most Popular Human Resources Degree Programs Ranking in New York

2026 Most Popular Human Resources Degree Programs Ranking in New York
2027 Best Online Certificate Programs for Accounting

2027 Best Online Certificate Programs for Accounting
2026 Best MBA Degree Programs Ranking in the South

2026 Best MBA Degree Programs Ranking in the South
Most Affordable Accounting Associate Degree Programs - Budget-Friendly Accounting Schools in Austin for 2026

Most Affordable Accounting Associate Degree Programs - Budget-Friendly Accounting Schools in Austin for 2026
2027 Finance Major Salaries: What Do Finance Jobs Pay?

2027 Finance Major Salaries: What Do Finance Jobs Pay?
2027 Best Accelerated Finance Degree Programs Online

2027 Best Accelerated Finance Degree Programs Online
2026 Fastest Online Doctorate in Business Degree Programs Ranking in the USA

2026 Fastest Online Doctorate in Business Degree Programs Ranking in the USA
2027 Cheapest Online Finance Master's Degrees That Pay Well: Tuition, Duration, and Earnings

2027 Cheapest Online Finance Master's Degrees That Pay Well: Tuition, Duration, and Earnings
2026 Best Accounting Degree Programs Ranking in Tampa

2026 Best Accounting Degree Programs Ranking in Tampa
2026 Best Business Degree Programs Ranking in Washington

2026 Best Business Degree Programs Ranking in Washington

Recently Published Articles

2027 How Long Does It Take to Earn an Online Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner Master's Degree? Program Timelines & Completion Options

2027 How Long Does It Take to Earn an Online Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner Master's Degree? Program Timelines & Completion Options
2027 Online vs On-Campus Animation Degree Programs: Pros & Cons

2027 Online vs On-Campus Animation Degree Programs: Pros & Cons
2027 Top Universities Offering Online Public Policy Master's Degrees

2027 Top Universities Offering Online Public Policy Master's Degrees
2027 Credit Requirements for a Public Relations Degree Explained

2027 Credit Requirements for a Public Relations Degree Explained
2027 Are Online MBA Programs Hard? Student Experience Breakdown

2027 Are Online MBA Programs Hard? Student Experience Breakdown
2027 Credit Requirements for a Business Administration Degree Explained

2027 Credit Requirements for a Business Administration Degree Explained
2027 Easiest Online Fashion Design Master's Degree Programs That Pay Well: High-Salary Degrees with Simple Admissions

2027 Easiest Online Fashion Design Master's Degree Programs That Pay Well: High-Salary Degrees with Simple Admissions
2027 PRN vs. RN: Explaining the Difference

2027 PRN vs. RN: Explaining the Difference
2027 Best States for Marriage and Family Therapy Degree Graduates: Salary, Demand, and Career Opportunity

2027 Best States for Marriage and Family Therapy Degree Graduates: Salary, Demand, and Career Opportunity
2027 Online Gerontology and Aging Master's Programs at Accredited U.S. Universities

2027 Online Gerontology and Aging Master's Programs at Accredited U.S. Universities
2027 Cheapest Accelerated Aviation Management Degree Programs Online

2027 Cheapest Accelerated Aviation Management Degree Programs Online
2027 AI Master's Degrees for International Students in the U.S.

2027 AI Master's Degrees for International Students in the U.S.
2027 Most Affordable Online Master’s Degrees in Forensic Science

2027 Most Affordable Online Master’s Degrees in Forensic Science
2027 Industry Demand for Computer Science Master's Graduates: Job Outlook & Hiring Trends

2027 Industry Demand for Computer Science Master's Graduates: Job Outlook & Hiring Trends
2027 What Can You Do with a Legal Studies Master's Degree? Careers, Salaries & Growth

2027 What Can You Do with a Legal Studies Master's Degree? Careers, Salaries & Growth
2027 Highest Level of Leadership Degree You Can Achieve: Academic Progression Explained

2027 Highest Level of Leadership Degree You Can Achieve: Academic Progression Explained
2027 How to Become a Pastoral Counselor

2027 How to Become a Pastoral Counselor
2027 Construction Management Degree Coursework Explained: What Classes Can You Expect to Take?

2027 Construction Management Degree Coursework Explained: What Classes Can You Expect to Take?
2027 Military-Friendly Online Nurse Executive Leadership Master's Degree Programs: Benefits, Accreditation & Career Outcomes

2027 Military-Friendly Online Nurse Executive Leadership Master's Degree Programs: Benefits, Accreditation & Career Outcomes
2027 Online Audio & Music Bachelor's Degree Programs With Asynchronous Classes

2027 Online Audio & Music Bachelor's Degree Programs With Asynchronous Classes
2027 Highest Level of Biochemistry Degree You Can Achieve: Academic Progression Explained

2027 Highest Level of Biochemistry Degree You Can Achieve: Academic Progression Explained