World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Mikolaj Czajkowski

Mikolaj Czajkowski

D-Index & Metrics

Economics and Finance

D-Index
44
Citations
5552
World Ranking
1886
National Ranking
3

Mikolaj Czajkowski publications per year

1980: 1 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 1 publications 2004: 1 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 25 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 30 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 12 publications
1980 2025

235 publications in total across all disciplines

Mikolaj Czajkowski publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2027

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Economics and Finance in 2027. The highlighted bar marks where Mikolaj Czajkowski sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 1 scientists 47–51 publications: 12 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 23 scientists 62–66 publications: 32 scientists 67–71 publications: 36 scientists 72–76 publications: 56 scientists 77–81 publications: 57 scientists 82–86 publications: 70 scientists 87–91 publications: 86 scientists 92–96 publications: 72 scientists 97–101 publications: 106 scientists 102–106 publications: 97 scientists 107–111 publications: 96 scientists 112–116 publications: 101 scientists 117–121 publications: 103 scientists 122–126 publications: 102 scientists 127–131 publications: 108 scientists 132–136 publications: 107 scientists 137–141 publications: 111 scientists 142–146 publications: 94 scientists 147–151 publications: 96 scientists 152–156 publications: 100 scientists 157–161 publications: 74 scientists 162–166 publications: 68 scientists 167–171 publications: 91 scientists 172–176 publications: 76 scientists 177–181 publications: 75 scientists 182–186 publications: 61 scientists 187–191 publications: 66 scientists 192–196 publications: 68 scientists 197–201 publications: 71 scientists 202–206 publications: 60 scientists 207–211 publications: 56 scientists 212–216 publications: 44 scientists 217–221 publications: 51 scientists 222–226 publications: 65 scientists 227–231 publications: 48 scientists 232–236 publications: 59 scientists 237–241 publications: 37 scientists 242–246 publications: 37 scientists 247–251 publications: 41 scientists 252–256 publications: 43 scientists 257–261 publications: 33 scientists 262–266 publications: 34 scientists 267–271 publications: 39 scientists 272–276 publications: 25 scientists 277–281 publications: 29 scientists 282–286 publications: 29 scientists 287–291 publications: 26 scientists 292–296 publications: 31 scientists 297–301 publications: 31 scientists 302–306 publications: 24 scientists 307–311 publications: 28 scientists 312–316 publications: 24 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 14 scientists 327–331 publications: 25 scientists 332–336 publications: 18 scientists 337–341 publications: 16 scientists 342–346 publications: 18 scientists 347–351 publications: 15 scientists 352–356 publications: 17 scientists 357–361 publications: 19 scientists 362–366 publications: 16 scientists 367–371 publications: 17 scientists 372–376 publications: 7 scientists 377–381 publications: 18 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 19 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 13 scientists 407–411 publications: 13 scientists 412–416 publications: 5 scientists 417–421 publications: 10 scientists 422–426 publications: 6 scientists 427–431 publications: 12 scientists 432–436 publications: 9 scientists 437–441 publications: 9 scientists 442–446 publications: 10 scientists 447–451 publications: 12 scientists 452–456 publications: 8 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 5 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 7 scientists 487–491 publications: 8 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 4 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 7 scientists 517–520 publications: 7 scientists 521+ publications: 99 scientists
42 publications 521+

This scientist: 206 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more.

Mikolaj Czajkowski D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2027

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2027. The highlighted bar marks where Mikolaj Czajkowski sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 126 scientists 31 D-Index: 147 scientists 32 D-Index: 157 scientists 33 D-Index: 178 scientists 34 D-Index: 171 scientists 35 D-Index: 141 scientists 36 D-Index: 132 scientists 37 D-Index: 129 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 120 scientists 40 D-Index: 117 scientists 41 D-Index: 113 scientists 42 D-Index: 114 scientists 43 D-Index: 97 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 86 scientists 46 D-Index: 78 scientists 47 D-Index: 83 scientists 48 D-Index: 62 scientists 49 D-Index: 74 scientists 50 D-Index: 50 scientists 51 D-Index: 66 scientists 52 D-Index: 69 scientists 53 D-Index: 55 scientists 54 D-Index: 67 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 62 scientists 57 D-Index: 45 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 47 scientists 60 D-Index: 46 scientists 61 D-Index: 36 scientists 62 D-Index: 37 scientists 63 D-Index: 56 scientists 64 D-Index: 50 scientists 65 D-Index: 32 scientists 66 D-Index: 28 scientists 67 D-Index: 30 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 25 scientists 70 D-Index: 22 scientists 71 D-Index: 21 scientists 72 D-Index: 26 scientists 73 D-Index: 24 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 12 scientists 76 D-Index: 14 scientists 77 D-Index: 15 scientists 78 D-Index: 15 scientists 79 D-Index: 17 scientists 80 D-Index: 17 scientists 81 D-Index: 11 scientists 82 D-Index: 10 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 11 scientists 85 D-Index: 5 scientists 86 D-Index: 9 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 9 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 6 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 8 scientists 93 D-Index: 10 scientists 94 D-Index: 11 scientists 95 D-Index: 6 scientists 96 D-Index: 4 scientists 97 D-Index: 4 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100 D-Index: 8 scientists 101+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 101+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mikolaj Czajkowski is affiliated with the University of Warsaw in Poland and works primarily within the field of Economics, Econometrics, and Finance. Their research focuses on topics related to economic and environmental valuation, decision-making and behavioral economics, and environmental sustainability. The scope of their work also extends to environmental education and sustainability, environmental sustainability in business, economics of agriculture and food markets, housing market and economics, and consumer market behavior and pricing.

Their publication record includes contributions to various journals and venues, with frequent publications in:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Ecological Economics
  • Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy
  • Journal of Agricultural Economics
  • Working Papers.

Czajkowski has published several notable research papers, including:

  • "Environmental attitudes and place identity as determinants of preferences for ecosystem services" (2020) in Ecological Economics
  • "Farmers' risk preferences in 11 European farming systems: A multi-country replication of Bocquého et al. (2014)" (2022) in Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy
  • "Using farmers' ex ante preferences to design agri-environmental contracts: A systematic review" (2023) in Journal of Agricultural Economics
  • "Trade-offs in the transition to a blue economy - Mapping social acceptance of aquaculture expansion in Norway" (2022) in The Science of The Total Environment
  • "An economic valuation of access to cultural institutions: museums, theatres, and cinemas" (2020) in Journal of Cultural Economics

Books authored by Czajkowski include titles published by Springer International Publishing, White Rose University Consortium, and Technische Universität Berlin - Universitätsbibliothek. Notable books include:

  • Environmental Valuation with Discrete Choice Experiments (2020) - Springer International Publishing
  • Environmental Valuation with Discrete Choice Experiments: Guidance on Design, Implementation and Data Analysis (2020) - White Rose University Consortium
  • Environmental valuation with discrete choice experiments (2020) - Technische Universität Berlin - Universitätsbibliothek

Czajkowski frequently collaborates with a group of co-authors including Julian Sagebiel, Klaus Glenk, Thijs Dekker, Katarzyna Zagórska, and Petr Mariel. The extent of collaboration is notable, with multiple joint publications involving these colleagues.

Best Publications

  • Economic valuation of air pollution mortality: A 9-country contingent valuation survey of value of a life year (VOLY)

    B. Desaigues;D. Ami;A. Bartczak;M. Braun-Kohlová

  • Social Norms, Morals and Self-interest as Determinants of Pro-environment Behaviours: The Case of Household Recycling

    Mikołaj Czajkowski;Nick Hanley;Karine Nyborg

  • Environmental Valuation with Discrete Choice Experiments

    Unknown

  • The discrete choice experiment approach to environmental contingent valuation

    Richard Carson;Mikolaj Czajkowski

  • We want to sort! - assessing households' preferences for sorting waste

    Mikołaj Czajkowski;Tadeusz Kądziela;Nick Hanley

  • The value of familiarity: Effects of knowledge and objective signals on willingness to pay for a public good

    Jacob LaRiviere;Mikołaj Czajkowski;Nick Hanley;Margrethe Aanesen

  • Valuing Changes in Forest Biodiversity

    Mikolaj Czajkowski;Malgorzata Buszko-Briggs;Nicholas Hanley

  • Spatial Heterogeneity of Willingness to Pay for Forest Management

    Mikołaj Czajkowski;Wiktor Budziński;Danny Campbell;Marek Giergiczny

  • Willingness to pay for unfamiliar public goods: Preserving cold-water coral in Norway

    Margrethe Aanesen;Claire Armstrong;Mikołaj Czajkowski;Jannike Falk-Petersen

  • Learning and Fatigue Effects Revisited: Investigating the Effects of Accounting for Unobservable Preference and Scale Heterogeneity

    Mikolaj Czajkowski;Marek Giergiczny;William H. Greene

  • Environmental attitudes and place identity as determinants of preferences for ecosystem services

    Michela Faccioli;Michela Faccioli;Mikołaj Czajkowski;Mikołaj Czajkowski;Klaus Glenk;Julia Martin-Ortega

  • Choice experiment assessment of public preferences for forest structural attributes.

    Marek Giergiczny;Mikołaj Czajkowski;Tomasz Żylicz;Per Angelstam

  • Simulation error in maximum likelihood estimation of discrete choice models

    Mikołaj Czajkowski;Wiktor Budziński

  • The Role of Stated Preference Valuation Methods in Understanding Choices and Informing Policy

    Nick Hanley;Mikołaj Czajkowski

  • Benefits of meeting nutrient reduction targets for the Baltic Sea – a contingent valuation study in the nine coastal states

    Heini Ahtiainen;Janne Artell;Mikolaj Czajkowski;Berit Hasler

  • The economic recreational value of a white stork nesting colony: A case of ‘stork village’ in Poland

    Mikołaj Czajkowski;Marek Giergiczny;Jakub Kronenberg;Piotr Tryjanowski

  • The Effects of Experience on Preferences: Theory and Empirics for Environmental Public Goods

    Mikolaj Czajkowski;Nicholas David Hanley;Jacob LaRiviere

  • Using Labels to Investigate Scope Effects in Stated Preference Methods

    Mikolaj Czajkowski;Nicholas Hanley

  • Environmental Valuation with Discrete Choice Experiments: Guidance on Design, Implementation and Data Analysis

    Petr Mariel;David Hoyos;Jürgen Meyerhoff;Mikolaj Czajkowski

  • Reduction of Baltic Sea Nutrient Inputs and Allocation of Abatement Costs Within the Baltic Sea Catchment

    Frederik Wulff;Christoph Humborg;Hans Estrup Andersen;Gitte Blicher-Mathiesen

  • Controlling for the Effects of Information in a Public Goods Discrete Choice Model

    Mikolaj Czajkowski;Nicholas David Hanley;Jacob LaRiviere

  • Social norm nudging and preferences for household recycling

    Mikołaj Czajkowski;Mikołaj Czajkowski;Katarzyna Zagórska;Nick Hanley

  • Social norms, morals and self-interest as determinants of pro-environment behaviours

    Mikolaj Czajkowski;Nicholas Hanley;Karine Nyborg

  • Environmental valuation with discrete choice experiments

    Petr Mariel;David Hoyos;Jürgen Meyerhoff;Mikolaj Czajkowski

Frequent Co-Authors

Nick Hanley
Nick Hanley University of Glasgow
Jürgen Meyerhoff
Jürgen Meyerhoff Berlin School of Economics and Law
Søren Bøye Olsen
Søren Bøye Olsen University of Copenhagen
Per Angelstam
Per Angelstam Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences
Marine Elbakidze
Marine Elbakidze Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Ståle Navrud
Ståle Navrud Norwegian University of Life Sciences
Piotr Tryjanowski
Piotr Tryjanowski University of Life Sciences in Poznań
Christoph Humborg
Christoph Humborg Stockholm University
Richard T. Carson
Richard T. Carson University of California, San Diego
Anke Fischer
Anke Fischer Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Economics and Finance opens doors to a wide range of online degrees and career pathways in the USA. Many students and professionals begin by strengthening their foundational skills through bookkeeping certification, which is ideal for understanding business transactions and building a career in accounting.

For those interested in a broader administrative role, an online associate of applied science in administration can lead to support and management opportunities across public and private sectors. This credential develops skills in office coordination, communication, and basic finance tasks.

If your interests lean toward people management and organizational strategy, consider a masters in human resources online to advance your expertise in recruiting, workforce planning, and employee relations—key skills required by today’s competitive employers.

Additionally, as organizations increasingly prioritize data-driven decision making, professionals with advanced data skills are in high demand. Pursuing one of the best online data analytics master's programs can help you master tools to analyze financial trends and guide strategic planning.

Best Scientists Citing Mikolaj Czajkowski

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles