World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
50
Citations
10772
World Ranking
4926
National Ranking
65

Mette Termansen publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mette Termansen sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 130 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Mette Termansen D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mette Termansen sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mette Termansen is affiliated with the University of Copenhagen in Denmark. Their primary research lies within the field of Environmental Science, with a specialized focus on Global and Planetary Change, Economics and Econometrics, Environmental Chemistry, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, and Soil Science.

The scientist's work covers several key topics, including:

  • Economic and Environmental Valuation
  • Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Water resources management and optimization
  • Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
  • Agricultural Economics and Policy
  • Agricultural risk and resilience

Termansen has contributed to publications in a range of academic venues. Notable frequent publication venues include:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • EuroChoices
  • Ecosystem Services
  • Ecological Economics
  • Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability

Among recent papers authored or co-authored by Termansen are:

  • "Diverse values of nature for sustainability," 2023, published in Nature
  • "Summary for policymakers of the methodological assessment of the diverse values and valuation of nature of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES)," 2022, published in UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia)
  • "European Agri-environmental Policy: Evolution, Effectiveness, and Challenges," 2022, published in Review of Environmental Economics and Policy
  • "Implementation of Eco-schemes in Fifteen European Union Member States," 2022, published in EuroChoices
  • "Nature Based Solutions for Climate Adaptation - Paying Farmers for Flood Control," 2020, published in Ecological Economics

Frequent co-authors in Termansen's research include:

  • Sander Jacobs
  • David González-Jiménez
  • Tuyeni H. Mwampamba
  • Victoria Contreras
  • Unai Pascual

Best Publications

  • The role of biotic interactions in shaping distributions and realised assemblages of species: implications for species distribution modelling

    Mary Susanne Wisz;Julien Pottier;W. Daniel Kissling;Loïc Pellissier

  • Bringing ecosystem services into economic decision-making: land use in the United Kingdom.

    Ian Jan Bateman;Amii R. Harwood;Georgina M. Mace;Robert T. Watson

  • Mapping cultural ecosystem services: a framework to assess the potential for outdoor recreation across the EU

    Maria Luisa Paracchini;Grazia Zulian;Leena Kopperoinen;Joachim Maes

  • When we cannot have it all: Ecosystem services trade-offs in the context of spatial planning

    Francis Turkelboom;Michael Leone;Sander Jacobs;Eszter Kelemen

  • Typologies of crop-drought vulnerability: an empirical analysis of the socio-economic factors that influence the sensitivity and resilience to drought of three major food crops in China (1961–2001)

    Elisabeth Simelton;Evan D.G. Fraser;Mette Termansen;Piers M. Forster

  • Policies for agricultural nitrogen management?trends, challenges and prospects for improved efficiency in Denmark

    Tommy Dalgaard;Birgitte Hansen;Berit Hasler;Ole Hertel

  • Assessing Vulnerability to Climate Change in Dryland Livelihood Systems: Conceptual Challenges and Interdisciplinary Solutions

    Evan D. G. Fraser;Andrew J. Dougill;Klaus Hubacek;Claire H. Quinn

  • Selecting methods for ecosystem service assessment: a decision tree approach

    Paula A. Harrison;Robert Dunford;David Nicholas Barton;Eszter Kelemen

  • Groundwater nitrate response to sustainable nitrogen management

    Birgitte Hansen;Lærke Thorling;Jörg Schullehner;Mette Termansen

  • African plant diversity and climate change

    Colin J. Mcclean;Jon. C. Lovett;Wolfgang KüPER;Lee Hannah

  • The means determine the end--Pursuing integrated valuation in practice

    Sander Jacobs;Berta Martín-López;David N. Barton;Robert Dunford

  • Costs and benefits of nitrogen in the environment

    Corjan Brink;Hans van Grinsven;Brian H. Jacobsen;Ari Rabl

  • “Vulnerability hotspots”: Integrating socio-economic and hydrological models to identify where cereal production may decline in the future due to climate change induced drought

    Evan D.G. Fraser;Evan D.G. Fraser;Elisabeth Simelton;Elisabeth Simelton;Mette Termansen;Mette Termansen;Simon N. Gosling

  • Valuing ecosystem services in terms of ecological risks and returns.

    David J. Abson;Mette Termansen;Mette Termansen

  • Evaluating farmers’ likely participation in a payment programme for water quality protection in the UK uplands

    Nesha Beharry-Borg;Jim Christopher Rudd Smart;Jim Christopher Rudd Smart;Mette Termansen;Mette Termansen;Klaus Hubacek;Klaus Hubacek

  • A spatial assessment of ecosystem services in Europe: Methods, case studies and policy analysis - phase 1

    J. Maes;L.C. Braat;K. Jax;M. Hutchins

  • Mainstreaming ecosystem services into EU policy

    Joachim Maes;Jennifer Hauck;Maria Luisa Paracchini;Outi Ratamäki;Outi Ratamäki

  • Benefit Transfer over Time of Ecosystem Values: the Case of Forest Recreation

    Marianne Zandersen;Mette Termansen;Frank S. Jensen

  • The socioeconomics of food crop production and climate change vulnerability: a global scale quantitative analysis of how grain crops are sensitive to drought

    Elisabeth Simelton;Elisabeth Simelton;Evan D. G. Fraser;Evan D. G. Fraser;Mette Termansen;Mette Termansen;Tim G. Benton

  • The future of the uplands

    M.S. Reed;A. Bonn;A. Bonn;W. Slee;W. Slee;N. Beharry-Borg;N. Beharry-Borg

  • Drivers of environmental change in uplands

    Aletta Bonn

Frequent Co-Authors

Klaus Hubacek
Klaus Hubacek University of Groningen
Evan D. G. Fraser
Evan D. G. Fraser University of Guelph
David J. Abson
David J. Abson Leuphana University of Lüneburg
Mark Reed
Mark Reed Scotland's Rural College
Roy Haines-Young
Roy Haines-Young University of Nottingham
Ian J. Bateman
Ian J. Bateman University of Exeter
Paula A. Harrison
Paula A. Harrison Lancaster University
Ignacio Palomo
Ignacio Palomo Grenoble Alpes University
Gavin M. Siriwardena
Gavin M. Siriwardena British Trust for Ornithology
David N. Barton
David N. Barton Norwegian Institute for Nature Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences opens doors to a variety of career paths that blend science, policy, and education. For those looking to advance into leadership roles within education or environmental advocacy, exploring edd without dissertation programs can be a practical approach to earning a terminal degree without the lengthy dissertation process.

Individuals currently holding an Educational Specialist (EdS) degree may find it seamless to transition into one of the top eds to edd programs, which offer specialized curricula tailored for leadership in educational settings, including environmental education sectors.

For professionals interested in the social dimensions of environmental work, affordable options for further education are available. Notably, the cheapest dsw program can prepare graduates for advanced clinical roles or policy making in community and environmental health contexts.

Additionally, students seeking flexible and cost-effective education pathways may consider cheapest online general studies degree programs. These programs provide broad interdisciplinary study options, which can be beneficial for careers in environmental consulting, sustainability, or management without committing to a narrow specialization.

Best Scientists Citing Mette Termansen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles