World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
50
Citations
16545
World Ranking
3735
National Ranking
411

Roy Haines-Young publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roy Haines-Young sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 137 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Roy Haines-Young D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roy Haines-Young sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Roy Haines-Young is affiliated with the University of Nottingham in the United Kingdom. Their research principally spans the field of Environmental Science, with particular focus on subfields such as Global and Planetary Change, Environmental Chemistry, Ecology, and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law.

The key topics addressed in their work include:

  • Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
  • Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation
  • Soil and Land Suitability Analysis

Haines-Young has contributed to several publications, with recent papers including:

  • The 18 benefits of using ecosystem services classification systems, 2020, Ecosystem Services
  • Ecosystem service indicators along the cascade: How do assessment and mapping studies position their indicators?, 2020, Ecological Indicators
  • Letter to the editor: Using classification systems to integrate ecosystem services with decision making tools, 2021, Ecosystem Services

Their work has been published primarily in the venues Ecosystem Services and Ecological Indicators.

Frequent collaborators in their research include John Finisdore, Charles Rhodes, Simone Maynard, Jeffrey Wielgus, and Joël Houdet, each having co-authored multiple papers with Haines-Young.

Best Publications

  • Ecosystem Ecology: The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being

    Roy Haines-Young;Marion Potschin

  • Bringing ecosystem services into economic decision-making: land use in the United Kingdom.

    Ian Jan Bateman;Amii R. Harwood;Georgina M. Mace;Robert T. Watson

  • Revision of the Common International Classification for Ecosystem Services (CICES V5.1): A Policy Brief

    Roy Haines-Young;Marion Potschin-Young

  • Integrating the ecological and economic dimensions in biodiversity and ecosystem service valuation

    R.S. de Groot;B. Fisher;M. Christie;J. Aronson

  • Ecosystem services: Exploring a geographical perspective

    Marion B. Potschin;Roy H. Haines-Young

  • Quantifying landscape structure: a review of landscape indices and their application to forested landscapes

    Roy Haines-Young;Mark Chopping

  • Ecosystem services and ethics

    Kurt Jax;Kurt Jax;David N. Barton;Kai M.A. Chan;Rudolf de Groot

  • National Parks, buffer zones and surrounding lands: Mapping ecosystem service flows

    Ignacio Palomo;Berta Martín-López;Marion Potschin;Roy Haines-Young

  • Land use and biodiversity relationships

    Roy Haines-Young

  • Indicators of ecosystem service potential at European scales: Mapping marginal changes and trade-offs

    Roy Haines-Young;Marion Potschin;Felix Kienast

  • Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES): Consultation on Version 4, August-December 2012

    Roy Haines-Young;Marion Potschin

  • Accounting for nature: assessing habitats in the UK countryside.

    R. H. Haines-Young;C. J. Barr;H. I. J. Black;D. J. Briggs

  • UK National Ecosystem Assessment:understanding nature's value to society. Synthesis of key findings

    R. Watson;S. Albon;R. Aspinall;M. Austen

  • Landscape Ecology and Geographical Information Systems

    R Haines-Young;David R. Green;S. H. Cousins

  • Understanding the role of conceptual frameworks: Reading the ecosystem service cascade

    Unknown

  • Assessing Landscape Functions with Broad-Scale Environmental Data: Insights Gained from a Prototype Development for Europe

    Felix Kienast;Janine Bolliger;Marion Potschin;Rudolf S. de Groot

  • Landscapes, sustainability and the place-based analysis of ecosystem services

    Marion Potschin;Roy Haines-Young

  • UK National Ecosystem Assessment:Technical report

    R Watson;S Albon;R Aspinall;M Austen

  • Routledge handbook of ecosystem services

    Robert Fisher;R. H. Haines-Young;Marion Potschin;R. Kerry Turner

  • “Rio+10”, sustainability science and Landscape Ecology☆

    Marion Potschin;Roy Haines-Young

  • Defining and Measuring Ecosystem Services

    Marion Potschin;Roy Haines-Young

Frequent Co-Authors

Ian J. Bateman
Ian J. Bateman University of Exeter
Mette Termansen
Mette Termansen University of Copenhagen
David J. Abson
David J. Abson Leuphana University of Lüneburg
Georgina M. Mace
Georgina M. Mace University College London
Gavin M. Siriwardena
Gavin M. Siriwardena British Trust for Ornithology
Les G. Firbank
Les G. Firbank University of Leeds
Paula A. Harrison
Paula A. Harrison Lancaster University
Bálint Czúcz
Bálint Czúcz Norwegian Institute for Nature Research
Joachim Maes
Joachim Maes KU Leuven
Michael Winter
Michael Winter University of Exeter

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Roy Haines-Young

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles