World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Benedikt L. Amann

Benedikt L. Amann

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 45 3956 3652 25 25 165 5963

Benedikt L. Amann publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Benedikt L. Amann between 1997 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Benedikt L. Amann published across 29 years, from 1997 to 2025, averaging 7.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2023. 15 of the 209 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2023. 1997: 1 publication 1998: 4 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 21 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 5 publications
1997 2025

209 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Benedikt L. Amann: publications per year, 1997 to 2025
Year Publications
1997 1
1998 4
1999 7
2000 6
2001 6
2002 3
2003 2
2004 2
2005 5
2006 5
2007 7
2008 2
2009 8
2010 4
2011 10
2012 4
2013 10
2014 9
2015 12
2016 9
2017 12
2018 7
2019 10
2020 5
2021 7
2022 16
2023 21
2024 10
2025 5
Total 209
Download as CSV

Benedikt L. Amann publications per year - data summary

  • Benedikt L. Amann, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from Pompeu Fabra University, has 209 publications recorded across 29 years, from 1997 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1997 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2023, with 21 publications.
  • The least productive year with any output is 1997, with 1 publication.
  • The rate of publication averages 7.2 papers per year over the whole span, or 7.2 per year counting only the 29 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 59 publications, 28% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1997-2006: 41 publications (4.1 per year); 2007-2016: 75 publications (7.5 per year); 2017-2025: 93 publications (10.3 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Benedikt L. Amann publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Benedikt L. Amann sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 164–173 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 165 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391 165
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Benedikt L. Amann publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 54 ranges running from 44–53 to 570+ publications.
  • Benedikt L. Amann, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from Pompeu Fabra University, records 165 publications - the 49th percentile of the discipline.
  • 49% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Benedikt L. Amann, and about 51% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 164–173 publications range, and Benedikt L. Amann falls inside that same range.
  • The most crowded range is 114–123 publications, holding 474 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 174–183 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 570 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Benedikt L. Amann D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Benedikt L. Amann sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260 45
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Benedikt L. Amann D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 71 ranges running from 30 to 100+ D-Index.
  • Benedikt L. Amann, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from Pompeu Fabra University, records 45 D-Index - the 52nd percentile of the discipline.
  • 52% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Benedikt L. Amann, and about 48% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 45 D-Index range, and Benedikt L. Amann falls inside that same range.
  • The most crowded range is 42 D-Index, holding 313 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 59% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 47 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more, 97 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Overview

Benedikt L. Amann is affiliated with Pompeu Fabra University in Spain. Their research spans multiple disciplines, primarily focusing on psychology, medicine, and health professions.

Their work encompasses several subfields of study, including:

  • Clinical Psychology
  • General Health Professions
  • Psychiatry and Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Neurology

The main topics addressed in their research involve:

  • Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Schizophrenia Research and Treatment
  • Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Migration, Health and Trauma

Benedikt L. Amann has authored or contributed to numerous papers, including notable recent publications such as:

  • Psychological trauma as a transdiagnostic risk factor for mental disorder: an umbrella meta-analysis (2022), published in European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
  • Workplace interventions to reduce depression and anxiety in small and medium-sized enterprises: A systematic review (2021), published in Journal of Affective Disorders
  • The effectiveness of organisational-level workplace mental health interventions on mental health and wellbeing in construction workers: A systematic review and recommended research agenda (2022), published in PLoS ONE
  • The Prevalence and Clinical and Sociodemographic Factors of Problem Online Gambling: A Systematic Review (2021), published in Journal of Gambling Studies
  • Efficacy of Carbamazepine and Its Derivatives in the Treatment of Bipolar Disorder (2021), published in Medicina

Frequent co-authors of Benedikt L. Amann include:

  • Ana Moreno-Alcázar
  • Víctor Pérez
  • Bridget Hogg
  • Alicia Valiente-Gómez
  • Ella Arensman

Their publications appear regularly in several key academic venues, such as:

  • Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • European Psychiatry
  • International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health
  • Journal of EMDR Practice and Research
  • Trials

Best Publications

  • Efficacy of Functional Remediation in Bipolar Disorder: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study

    Carla Torrent;Caterina del Mar Bonnin;Anabel Martínez-Arán;Jesús Valle

  • EMDR beyond PTSD: A Systematic Literature Review.

    Alicia Valiente-Gómez;Ana Moreno-Alcázar;Devi Treen;Carlos Cedrón

  • Weight gain in bipolar disorder: pharmacological treatment as a contributing factor.

    C. Torrent;B. Amann;J. Sánchez-Moreno;F. Colom

  • How Does Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing Therapy Work? A Systematic Review on Suggested Mechanisms of Action.

    Ramon Landin-Romero;Ana Moreno-Alcazar;Marco Pagani;Benedikt L. Amann

  • Psychological trauma as a transdiagnostic risk factor for mental disorder: an umbrella meta-analysis

    Unknown

  • Excitability of motor cortex inhibitory circuits in tourette syndrome before and after single dose nicotine

    M. Orth;B. Amann;M. M. Robertson;J. C. Rothwell

  • Effects of atypical antipsychotics on neurocognition in euthymic bipolar patients

    Carla Torrent;Anabel Martinez-Arán;Claire Daban;Benedikt Amann

  • Efficacy of Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing in Children and Adolescent with Post-traumatic Stress Disorder: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

    Ana Moreno-Alcázar;Devi Treen;Alicia Valiente-Gómez;Albert Sio-Eroles

  • Tiagabine appears not to be efficacious in the treatment of acute mania.

    Heinz Grunze;Andreas Erfurth;Alain Marcuse;Benedikt Amann

  • EEG abnormalities associated with antipsychotics: a comparison of quetiapine, olanzapine, haloperidol and healthy subjects.

    Benedikt L. Amann;Oliver Pogarell;Roland Mergl;Georg Juckel

  • Functional remediation in bipolar disorder: 1-year follow-up of neurocognitive and functional outcome

    C M Bonnin;C Torrent;C Arango;B L Amann

  • Evaluation of machine learning algorithms and structural features for optimal MRI-based diagnostic prediction in psychosis.

    Raymond Salvador;Joaquim Radua;Erick J. Canales-Rodríguez;Aleix Solanes

  • Bipolar depressed patients show both failure to activate and failure to de-activate during performance of a working memory task

    Paloma Fernández-Corcuera;Raymond Salvador;Gemma C. Monté;S. Salvador Sarró

  • Antimanic efficacy of topiramate in 11 patients in an open trial with an on-off-on design.

    Heinz C. R. Grunze;Claus Normann;Jens Langosch;Martin Schaefer

  • Six-month functional outcome of a bipolar disorder cohort in the context of a specialized-care program.

    Adriane R Rosa;Adriane R Rosa;Adriane R Rosa;Maria Reinares;Benedikt Amann;Dina Popovic

  • Meta-Analysis of the Risk of Subsequent Mood Episodes in Bipolar Disorder.

    Joaquim Radua;Heinz Grunze;Benedikt L Amann

  • Acute antimanic efficacy and safety of oxcarbazepine in an open trial with an on-off-on design.

    Barbara Hummel;Joerg Walden;Robert Stampfer;Sandra Dittmann

  • Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing therapy in subsyndromal bipolar patients with a history of traumatic events: A randomized, controlled pilot-study

    Patricia Novo;Ramon Landin-Romero;Joaquim Radua;Victor Vicens

  • A Prospective 4-Year Naturalistic Follow-Up of Treatment and Outcome of 300 Bipolar I and II Patients

    Christian Simhandl;Barbara König;Benedikt L. Amann

  • Brain functional changes across the different phases of bipolar disorder.

    Edith Pomarol-Clotet;Silvia Alonso-Lana;Noemi Moro;Salvador Sarró

  • Intravenous valproate loading in acutely manic and depressed bipolar I patients.

    Heinz Grunze;Andreas Erfurth;Benedikt Amann;Giancarlo Giupponi

  • Brain structural changes in schizoaffective disorder compared to schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.

    B. L. Amann;E. J. Canales‐Rodríguez;M. Madre;J. Radua

Frequent Co-Authors

Eduard Vieta
Eduard Vieta University of Barcelona
Heinz Grunze
Heinz Grunze Paracelsus Medical University
Edith Pomarol-Clotet
Edith Pomarol-Clotet Fidmag Sisters Hospitallers
Joaquim Radua
Joaquim Radua University of Barcelona
Peter J. McKenna
Peter J. McKenna Fidmag Sisters Hospitallers
Caterina del Mar Bonnin
Caterina del Mar Bonnin University of Barcelona
Carla Torrent
Carla Torrent University of Barcelona
Jose Manuel Goikolea
Jose Manuel Goikolea University of Barcelona
Anabel Martínez-Arán
Anabel Martínez-Arán University of Barcelona
Salvador Sarró
Salvador Sarró Institut Sarró

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The growing demand for qualified professionals in social sciences and humanities has fueled the rise of flexible online degree options in the USA. Prospective students can find a range of affordable, high-quality programs tailored to different career goals. For those interested in social work, exploring the cheapest msw programs can help reduce educational expenses while still preparing for impactful careers helping individuals and communities.

Students focused on behavior analysis may consider searching for the cheapest bcba online program to start a specialized path in behavioral health, education, or therapy. Additionally, individuals aiming for a faster track can look into accelerated social work programs or pursue the fastest psychology degree, streamlining their journey into counseling, therapy, or research roles.

These options make it easier than ever to begin or advance your career in social sciences and humanities, offering both affordability and efficiency for a range of professional pathways.

Best Scientists Citing Benedikt L. Amann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles