World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Caterina del Mar Bonnin

Caterina del Mar Bonnin

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
57
Citations
9239
World Ranking
4084
National Ranking
45

Caterina del Mar Bonnin publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Caterina del Mar Bonnin sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 150 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Caterina del Mar Bonnin D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Caterina del Mar Bonnin sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Caterina del Mar Bonnin is affiliated with the University of Barcelona in Spain. Their research primarily spans the fields of medicine and psychology, with a strong focus on psychiatry and mental health. The scientist's work includes significant contributions to clinical psychology, cognitive neuroscience, speech and hearing, and pulmonary and respiratory medicine.

The main topics covered in their publications are diverse but center on mental health and neuropsychiatric disorders. These include Bipolar Disorder and Treatment, Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies, Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare, Schizophrenia research and treatment, Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders, and Electrolyte and hormonal disorders.

Key publication venues for Caterina del Mar Bonnin reflect their focus on psychiatric and neuropsychological research. These venues include European Neuropsychopharmacology, Journal of Affective Disorders, Bipolar Disorders, Psychological Medicine, and Human Brain Mapping.

Frequent collaborators in their research include Eduard Vieta, Carla Torrent, Anabel Martínez-Arán, Brisa Solé, and Laura Montejo.

Some recent papers that illustrate their research focus and output are:

  • Brain aging in major depressive disorder: results from the ENIGMA major depressive disorder working group, 2020, Molecular Psychiatry
  • Virtual Histology of Cortical Thickness and Shared Neurobiology in 6 Psychiatric Disorders, 2020, JAMA Psychiatry
  • What we learn about bipolar disorder from large-scale neuroimaging: Findings and future directions from the ENIGMA Bipolar Disorder Working Group, 2020, Human Brain Mapping
  • Longitudinal Structural Brain Changes in Bipolar Disorder: A Multicenter Neuroimaging Study of 1232 Individuals by the ENIGMA Bipolar Disorder Working Group, 2021, Biological Psychiatry
  • In vivo hippocampal subfield volumes in bipolar disorder-A mega-analysis from The Enhancing Neuro Imaging Genetics through Meta-Analysis Bipolar Disorder Working Group, 2020, Human Brain Mapping

Best Publications

  • Clinical and neurocognitive predictors of functional outcome in bipolar euthymic patients: A long-term, follow-up study

    C.M. Bonnín;A. Martínez-Arán;C. Torrent;I. Pacchiarotti

  • Efficacy of Functional Remediation in Bipolar Disorder: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study

    Carla Torrent;Caterina del Mar Bonnin;Anabel Martínez-Arán;Jesús Valle

  • Brain aging in major depressive disorder: results from the ENIGMA major depressive disorder working group

    Laura K.M. Han;Richard Dinga;Richard Dinga;Tim Hahn;Christopher R.K. Ching

  • Cognitive Impairment in Bipolar Disorder: Treatment and Prevention Strategies.

    Brisa Solé;Esther Jiménez;Carla Torrent;Maria Reinares

  • Gender differences in a cohort study of 604 bipolar patients: the role of predominant polarity.

    Alessandra M.A. Nivoli;Isabella Pacchiarotti;Adriane R. Rosa;Dina Popovic

  • Functional impairment and disability across mood states in bipolar disorder.

    Adriane R. Rosa;María Reinares;Erin E. Michalak;C. Mar Bonnin

  • Virtual Histology of Cortical Thickness and Shared Neurobiology in 6 Psychiatric Disorders

    Yash Patel;Nadine Parker;Jean Shin;Derek Howard

  • Methodological recommendations for cognition trials in bipolar disorder by the International Society for Bipolar Disorders Targeting Cognition Task Force.

    K W Miskowiak;K E Burdick;A Martinez-Aran;C M Bonnin

  • Subthreshold symptoms in bipolar disorder: impact on neurocognition, quality of life and disability.

    C.M. Bonnín;J. Sánchez-Moreno;A. Martínez-Arán;B. Solé

  • Polarity index of pharmacological agents used for maintenance treatment of bipolar disorder

    Dina Popovic;Maria Reinares;Jose Manuel Goikolea;Caterina Mar Bonnin

  • Assessing and addressing cognitive impairment in bipolar disorder: the International Society for Bipolar Disorders targeting cognition task force recommendations for clinicians

    K W Miskowiak;K W Miskowiak;K E Burdick;A Martinez-Aran;C M Bonnin

  • Long-term outcome of cognitive impairment in bipolar disorder.

    Carla Torrent;Anabel Martinez-Arán;Caterina del Mar Bonnin;Maria Reinares

  • Validity and reliability of a rating scale on subjective cognitive deficits in bipolar disorder (COBRA).

    Adriane R. Rosa;Clara Mercadé;Jose Sánchez-Moreno;Brisa Solé

  • The impact of staging bipolar disorder on treatment outcome of family psychoeducation

    María Reinares;Francesc Colom;Adriane R. Rosa;C. Mar Bonnín

  • Using structural MRI to identify bipolar disorders – 13 site machine learning study in 3020 individuals from the ENIGMA Bipolar Disorders Working Group

    Abraham Nunes;Hugo G. Schnack;Christopher R.K. Ching;Christopher R.K. Ching;Ingrid Agartz

  • What we learn about bipolar disorder from large‐scale neuroimaging: Findings and future directions from the ENIGMA bipolar disorder working group

    Christopher R K Ching;Derrek P Hibar;Tiril P Gurholt;Tiril P Gurholt;Abraham Nunes

  • Effects of atypical antipsychotics on neurocognition in euthymic bipolar patients

    Carla Torrent;Anabel Martinez-Arán;Claire Daban;Benedikt Amann

  • Improving Functioning, Quality of Life, and Well-being in Patients With Bipolar Disorder.

    Caterina del Mar Bonnín;María Reinares;Anabel Martínez-Arán;Esther Jiménez

  • Cognitive reserve in bipolar disorder: relation to cognition, psychosocial functioning and quality of life

    C. Anaya;C. Anaya;C. Torrent;C. Torrent;F. F. Caballero;F. F. Caballero;E. Vieta;E. Vieta

  • Towards a clinical staging for bipolar disorder: Defining patient subtypes based on functional outcome

    María Reinares;Efstathios Papachristou;Philip Harvey;C. Mar Bonnín

  • Neurocognitive impairment and psychosocial functioning in bipolar II disorder

    B. Solé;C. M. Bonnin;C. Torrent;V. Balanzá-Martínez

  • Psychoeducation for bipolar II disorder: An exploratory, 5-year outcome subanalysis

    F. Colom;E. Vieta;J. Sánchez-Moreno;J.M. Goikolea

Frequent Co-Authors

Eduard Vieta
Eduard Vieta University of Barcelona
Anabel Martínez-Arán
Anabel Martínez-Arán University of Barcelona
Carla Torrent
Carla Torrent University of Barcelona
Brisa Solé
Brisa Solé Consorci Institut D'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer
María Reinares
María Reinares University of Barcelona
Jose Manuel Goikolea
Jose Manuel Goikolea University of Barcelona
Isabella Pacchiarotti
Isabella Pacchiarotti University of Barcelona
José Sánchez-Moreno
José Sánchez-Moreno University of Barcelona
Benedikt L. Amann
Benedikt L. Amann Pompeu Fabra University
Joaquim Radua
Joaquim Radua University of Barcelona

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you look to advance your studies in psychology, exploring related online degrees and career pathways can open up multiple opportunities. Online programs in counseling and psychology offer flexibility, making them popular among working professionals and those seeking to balance other commitments.

Choosing the right program is crucial. Accreditation, faculty expertise, and student support services should all be considered. Regional trends also matter. For example, prospective students may want to investigate the most valuable counseling programs in Seattle, or compare options in different states.

Students in Texas can gain insights from the most valuable counseling degree programs ranking in Texas, while those in the Midwest might look at the most valuable counseling programs in Wisconsin. Online options are also expanding rapidly, with schools in Florida now offering some of the most valuable counseling master's programs in Florida.

By researching these programs, students can identify pathways not only in professional counseling but also in school psychology, mental health advocacy, and clinical research—launching rewarding careers anywhere in the country or online.

Best Scientists Citing Caterina del Mar Bonnin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles