World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Psychology
UK
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 98 678 592 86 78 553 35501
Medicine 99 8601 8078 841 803 554 35806

Jan Scott publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jan Scott between 1984 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jan Scott published across 42 years, from 1984 to 2025, averaging 14.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 56 publications in 2006. 38 of the 627 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1984 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 56. Peak 56 publications in 2006. 1984: 1 publication 1985: 1 publication 1986: 2 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 6 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 7 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 12 publications 1996: 10 publications 1997: 8 publications 1998: 8 publications 1999: 11 publications 2000: 12 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 19 publications 2003: 12 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 17 publications 2006: 56 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 17 publications 2009: 26 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 22 publications 2013: 26 publications 2014: 29 publications 2015: 22 publications 2016: 23 publications 2017: 31 publications 2018: 23 publications 2019: 21 publications 2020: 25 publications 2021: 36 publications 2022: 18 publications 2023: 14 publications 2024: 23 publications 2025: 15 publications
1984 2025

627 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jan Scott: publications per year, 1984 to 2025
Year Publications
1984 1
1985 1
1986 2
1987 2
1988 5
1989 6
1990 5
1991 7
1992 4
1993 7
1994 6
1995 12
1996 10
1997 8
1998 8
1999 11
2000 12
2001 8
2002 19
2003 12
2004 8
2005 17
2006 56
2007 8
2008 17
2009 26
2010 10
2011 11
2012 22
2013 26
2014 29
2015 22
2016 23
2017 31
2018 23
2019 21
2020 25
2021 36
2022 18
2023 14
2024 23
2025 15
Total 627
Download as CSV

Jan Scott publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Scott sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 551–560 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 553 publications — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16 553
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Jan Scott D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Scott sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 98–99 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 98 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53 98
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Psychology in United Kingdom Leader Award

Overview

Jan Scott is affiliated with Newcastle University in the United Kingdom and has contributed extensively to the fields of psychology and medicine, with a primary focus on psychiatry and mental health. Their research spans experimental and cognitive psychology, cognitive neuroscience, endocrine and autonomic systems, as well as speech and hearing.

The scientist's main research topics include bipolar disorder and treatment, sleep and related disorders, mental health research topics, schizophrenia research and treatment, circadian rhythm and melatonin, adolescent and pediatric healthcare, and sleep and wakefulness research.

Jan Scott has published numerous papers, including several recent notable works:

  • "Transdiagnostic clinical staging in youth mental health: a first international consensus statement" (2020, World Psychiatry)
  • "Adjunctive Psychotherapy for Bipolar Disorder" (2020, JAMA Psychiatry)
  • "Circadian rhythm sleep-wake disturbances and depression in young people: implications for prevention and early intervention" (2021, The Lancet Psychiatry)
  • "Sleep disturbances and first onset of major mental disorders in adolescence and early adulthood: A systematic review and meta-analysis" (2021, Sleep Medicine Reviews)
  • "Neurobiological and behavioral mechanisms of circadian rhythm disruption in bipolar disorder: A critical multi-disciplinary literature review and agenda for future research from the ISBD task force on chronobiology" (2021, Bipolar Disorders)

Frequent co-authors of Jan Scott include:

  • Ian B. Hickie
  • Jacob J. Crouse
  • Bruno Étain
  • Frank Iorfino
  • Håvard Kallestad

Jan Scott's publications are often found in these prominent journals:

  • Journal of Affective Disorders
  • Bipolar Disorders
  • International Journal of Bipolar Disorders
  • Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
  • European Neuropsychopharmacology

The body of work by Jan Scott reflects a multidisciplinary approach addressing complex mental health conditions with an emphasis on mood disorders, sleep-related issues, and developmental aspects of psychiatric illnesses in youth and young adults.

Best Publications

  • The HCL-32: towards a self-assessment tool for hypomanic symptoms in outpatients

    Jules Angst;Rolf Adolfsson;Franco Benazzi;Alex Gamma

  • A randomized controlled trial of cognitive-behavioral therapy for persistent symptoms in schizophrenia resistant to medication.

    Tom Sensky;Douglas Turkington;David Kingdon;Janine L. Scott

  • Treatment non‐adherence in affective disorders

    Ravi Lingam;Jan Scott

  • Evidence-based guidelines for treating depressive disorders with antidepressants: A revision of the 2008 British Association for Psychopharmacology guidelines

    Anthony Cleare;Carmine Pariante;Allan Young;I M Anderson

  • Evidence-based pharmacological treatment of anxiety disorders, post-traumatic stress disorder and obsessive-compulsive disorder: A revision of the 2005 guidelines from the British Association for Psychopharmacology

    David S. Baldwin;David S. Baldwin;Ian M. Anderson;David J. Nutt;Christer Allgulander

  • Evidence-based guidelines for the pharmacological treatment of anxiety disorders: recommendations from the British Association for Psychopharmacology

    David S. Baldwin;Ian M. Anderson;David J. Nutt;Borwin Bandelow

  • Cognitive-behavioural therapy for severe and recurrent bipolar disorders: randomised controlled trial.

    Jan Scott;Eugene Paykel;Richard Morriss;Richard Bentall

  • Autobiographical memory in depression.

    J. M. G. Williams;J. Scott

  • Autobiographical memory in depression: state or trait marker?

    A. D. Brittlebank;J. Scott;J. M. G. Williams;I. N. Ferrier

  • Evidence-based guidelines for treating depressive disorders with antidepressants: A revision of the 2000 British Association for Psychopharmacology guidelines

    IM Anderson;IN Ferrier;RC Baldwin;PJ Cowen

  • Nonadherence with antipsychotic medication in schizophrenia: challenges and management strategies

    Peter M Haddad;Cecilia Brain;Jan Scott

  • Prevention of relapse in residual depression by cognitive therapy: a controlled trial.

    Eugene S. Paykel;Jan Scott;John D. Teasdale;Anthony L. Johnson

  • Neuropsychological function in euthymic patients with bipolar disorder.

    I. N. Ferrier;Biba R. Stanton;T. P. Kelly;Jan Scott

  • Novel Loci for Adiponectin Levels and Their Influence on Type 2 Diabetes and Metabolic Traits: A Multi-Ethnic Meta-Analysis of 45,891 Individuals

    Z Dastani;Hivert M-F.;Hivert M-F.;N Timpson;Perry Jrb.;Perry Jrb.

  • A systematic review of manic and depressive prodromes

    Alison Jackson;Jonathan Cavanagh;Jan Scott

  • Can bipolar disorder be viewed as a multi-system inflammatory disease?

    Marion Leboyer;Isabella Soreca;Jan Scott;Jan Scott;Mark Frye

  • Rumination-focused cognitive-behavioural therapy for residual depression: phase II randomised controlled trial

    Edward R. Watkins;Eugene Mullan;Janet Wingrove;Katharine Rimes

  • Rumination-focused cognitive behaviour therapy for residual depression: a case series.

    Ed Watkins;Jan Scott;Janet Wingrove;Katharine Rimes

  • Cognitive vulnerability in patients with bipolar disorder.

    Jan Scott;B. Stanton;A. Garland;I. N. Ferrier

  • Nonadherence with mood stabilizers: prevalence and predictors.

    Jan Scott;Marie Pope

  • Preliminary communication The HCL-32: Towards a self-assessment tool for hypomanic symptoms in outpatients

    Jules Angst;Rolf Adolfsson;Franco Benazzi;Alex Gamma

Frequent Co-Authors

Eduard Vieta
Eduard Vieta University of Barcelona
Bruno Etain
Bruno Etain Université Paris Cité
Ian B. Hickie
Ian B. Hickie University of Sydney
Marion Leboyer
Marion Leboyer Paris-Est Créteil University
Daniel F. Hermens
Daniel F. Hermens University of the Sunshine Coast
Francesc Colom
Francesc Colom Clínic Barcelona
Michael Berk
Michael Berk Deakin University
Sharon L. Naismith
Sharon L. Naismith University of Sydney
Gunnar Morken
Gunnar Morken Norwegian University of Science and Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology opens the door to a variety of fulfilling roles, including substance abuse counseling. As mental health needs across the USA continue to rise, demand for substance abuse counselors is growing. Many universities now offer online degrees in psychology and counseling, making it easier to begin or advance in this field.

Requirements for becoming a counselor can vary depending on location. If you’re interested in learning about substance abuse counselor requirements in Cleveland, it’s important to review local education, certification, and supervised experience criteria. Similarly, those considering practice in other areas will benefit from researching substance abuse counselor requirements in Colorado Springs.

For those looking into Columbus substance abuse counselor certification requirements or wondering about becoming a substance abuse counselor in Corpus Christi, it is essential to understand the different licensing processes and educational standards in each city.

Choosing the right online degree and understanding regional pathways can help you kick-start a rewarding career addressing addiction and making a difference in your community.

Best Scientists Citing Jan Scott

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles