World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 58 3840 3538 14 14 308 15086

Maj Vinberg publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Maj Vinberg between 2007 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Maj Vinberg published across 19 years, from 2007 to 2025, averaging 19.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 46 publications in 2021. 53 of the 370 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2007 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 46. Peak 46 publications in 2021. 2007: 6 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 22 publications 2016: 32 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 19 publications 2019: 35 publications 2020: 23 publications 2021: 46 publications 2022: 27 publications 2023: 24 publications 2024: 27 publications 2025: 26 publications
2007 2025

370 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Maj Vinberg: publications per year, 2007 to 2025
Year Publications
2007 6
2008 3
2009 7
2010 12
2011 8
2012 13
2013 15
2014 10
2015 22
2016 32
2017 15
2018 19
2019 35
2020 23
2021 46
2022 27
2023 24
2024 27
2025 26
Total 370
Download as CSV

Maj Vinberg publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maj Vinberg sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 301–310 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 308 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102 308
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Maj Vinberg D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maj Vinberg sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 58–59 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325 58
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Maj Vinberg is affiliated with the University of Copenhagen in Denmark and has contributed extensively to research in the fields of medicine and psychology, with a particular focus on psychiatry and mental health. Their work spans several important subfields including clinical psychology, pharmacology, experimental and cognitive psychology, and biological psychiatry.

Their research primarily addresses key topics such as bipolar disorder and its treatment, schizophrenia research and treatment, and the role of tryptophan in brain disorders. Additional areas of focus include child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, treatment of major depression, adolescent and pediatric healthcare, and electroconvulsive therapy studies.

Maj Vinberg has published multiple papers in leading journals within their fields of study. Notable recent publications include:

  • "Fatigue and cognitive impairment in Post-COVID-19 Syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis," 2021, Brain Behavior and Immunity
  • "Bipolar disorders," 2020, The Lancet
  • "Treatment-resistant depression: definition, prevalence, detection, management, and investigational interventions," 2023, World Psychiatry
  • "Prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus, impaired fasting glucose, general obesity, and abdominal obesity in patients with bipolar disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis," 2021, Journal of Affective Disorders
  • "The effectiveness of ketamine on anxiety, irritability, and agitation: Implications for treating mixed features in adults with major depressive or bipolar disorder," 2020, Bipolar Disorders

Their frequent publication venues reflect their research interests and include:

  • Journal of Affective Disorders
  • European Neuropsychopharmacology
  • Bipolar Disorders
  • Psychological Medicine
  • International Journal of Bipolar Disorders

Collaboration is a significant aspect of Maj Vinberg's work. Frequent co-authors are:

  • Lars Vedel Kessing
  • Kamilla Woznica Miskowiak
  • Hanne Lie Kjærstad
  • Maria Faurholt-Jepsen
  • Klara Coello

The breadth of topics and collaborative networks as well as the diversity in publication venues highlight a comprehensive engagement with the psychiatric and psychological sciences, particularly around mood disorders and related treatment methodologies.

Best Publications

  • Fatigue and cognitive impairment in Post-COVID-19 Syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis

    Unknown

  • Cytokines in bipolar disorder vs. healthy control subjects: A systematic review and meta-analysis

    Klaus Munkholm;Julie Vestergaard Braüner;Lars Vedel Kessing;Maj Vinberg

  • Salivary cortisol in depressed patients versus control persons: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Ulla Knorr;Maj Vinberg;Lars V. Kessing;Jørn Wetterslev

  • Designing mobile health technology for bipolar disorder: a field trial of the monarca system

    Jakob E. Bardram;Mads Frost;Károly Szántó;Maria Faurholt-Jepsen

  • Cytokines in bipolar disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Klaus Munkholm;Maj Vinberg;Lars Vedel Kessing

  • Smartphone Data as an Electronic Biomarker of Illness Activity in Bipolar Disorder

    M. Faurholt-Jepsen;M. Vinberg;M. Frost;E.M. Christensen

  • Measurements of brain-derived neurotrophic factor: methodological aspects and demographical data.

    Viktorija Trajkovska;Anders B. Marcussen;Maj Vinberg;Per Hartvig

  • Validity of the diagnosis of a single depressive episode in a case register.

    Camilla Bock;Jens Drachmann Bukh;Maj Vinberg;Ulrik Gether

  • Voice analysis as an objective state marker in bipolar disorder

    M. Faurholt-Jepsen;Jonas Busk;M. Frost;M. Vinberg

  • Anti-inflammatory agents in the treatment of bipolar depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Joshua D Rosenblat;Ron Kakar;Ron Kakar;Michael Berk;Michael Berk;Lars V Kessing

  • Daily electronic self-monitoring in bipolar disorder using smartphones - the MONARCA I trial: a randomized, placebo-controlled, single-blind, parallel group trial.

    M. Faurholt-Jepsen;M. Frost;C. Ritz;E. M. Christensen

  • Smartphone data as objective measures of bipolar disorder symptoms

    Maria Faurholt-Jepsen;Mads Frost;Maj Vinberg;Ellen Margrethe Christensen

  • Ketogenic diet as a metabolic therapy for mood disorders: Evidence and developments.

    Elisa Brietzke;Elisa Brietzke;Rodrigo B. Mansur;Mehala Subramaniapillai;Vicent Balanzá-Martínez

  • Peripheral blood brain-derived neurotrophic factor in bipolar disorder: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.

    K Munkholm;M Vinberg;L V Kessing

  • The Prevalence, Measurement, and Treatment of the Cognitive Dimension/Domain in Major Depressive Disorder

    Roger S. McIntyre;Roger S. McIntyre;Holly X. Xiao;Kahlood Syeda;Maj Vinberg

  • Is there an association between subjective and objective measures of cognitive function in patients with affective disorders

    Anne M. Svendsen;Lars V. Kessing;Klaus Munkholm;Maj Vinberg

  • Discrete neurocognitive subgroups in fully or partially remitted bipolar disorder: Associations with functional abilities.

    Johan Høy Jensen;Ulla Knorr;Maj Vinberg;Lars V. Kessing

  • Liraglutide promotes improvements in objective measures of cognitive dysfunction in individuals with mood disorders: A pilot, open-label study.

    Rodrigo B. Mansur;Rodrigo B. Mansur;Juhie Ahmed;Danielle S. Cha;Hanna O. Woldeyohannes

  • The Bipolar Illness Onset study: research protocol for the BIO cohort study.

    Lars Vedel Kessing;Klaus Munkholm;Maria Faurholt-Jepsen;Kamilla Woznica Miskowiak

  • Gut microbiota composition in patients with newly diagnosed bipolar disorder and their unaffected first-degree relatives.

    Klara Coello;Tue Haldor Hansen;Nikolaj Sørensen;Klaus Munkholm

  • Interaction between genetic polymorphisms and stressful life events in first episode depression

    Jens Drachmann Bukh;Camilla Bock;Maj Vinberg;Thomas Werge

  • Recombinant Human Erythropoietin for Treating Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Phase 2 Trial

    Kamilla W Miskowiak;Maj Vinberg;Ellen M Christensen;Jens D Bukh

Frequent Co-Authors

Lars Vedel Kessing
Lars Vedel Kessing University of Copenhagen
Kamilla W. Miskowiak
Kamilla W. Miskowiak Copenhagen University Hospital
Jakob E. Bardram
Jakob E. Bardram Technical University of Denmark
Roger S. McIntyre
Roger S. McIntyre University of Toronto
Ulrik Gether
Ulrik Gether University of Copenhagen
Catherine J. Harmer
Catherine J. Harmer University of Oxford
Rodrigo B. Mansur
Rodrigo B. Mansur University Health Network
Seetal Dodd
Seetal Dodd Deakin University
Jens Bukh
Jens Bukh University of Copenhagen
Michael Berk
Michael Berk Deakin University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering studying Psychology in the USA, exploring related fields—such as Social Work—can open up additional academic and career opportunities. Many students combine interests in psychology and social work to broaden their impact in communities, healthcare, and educational settings.

Online degree programs in Social Work have become increasingly accessible, allowing for flexibility if you’re balancing work or family commitments. When choosing a program, it’s important to consider regional strengths and specific opportunities. For example, the best social work degrees in the Northeast are recognized for academic excellence and networking opportunities.

Students in the Midwest and South might look to the top social work programs in Oklahoma, which offer unique concentrations. If you prefer studying in urban environments, explore the best social work degree programs in Philadelphia or consider the top social work programs in Portland for training in innovative community initiatives.

Whether you pursue psychology, social work, or a blend of both, these pathways can lead to rewarding roles in counseling, advocacy, research, and clinical practice.

Best Scientists Citing Maj Vinberg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles