World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 84 1213 1067 744 637 473 32255

John Torous publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by John Torous between 1997 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. John Torous published across 30 years, from 1997 to 2026, averaging 23.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 111 publications in 2025. 113 of the 703 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75 100
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 111. Peak 111 publications in 2025. 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 0 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 29 publications 2017: 41 publications 2018: 48 publications 2019: 64 publications 2020: 89 publications 2021: 72 publications 2022: 68 publications 2023: 68 publications 2024: 84 publications 2025: 111 publications 2026: 2 publications
1997 2026

703 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
John Torous: publications per year, 1997 to 2026
Year Publications
1997 1
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 0
2004 0
2005 0
2006 0
2007 0
2008 0
2009 0
2010 0
2011 1
2012 0
2013 0
2014 10
2015 15
2016 29
2017 41
2018 48
2019 64
2020 89
2021 72
2022 68
2023 68
2024 84
2025 111
2026 2
Total 703
Download as CSV

John Torous publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Torous sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 471–480 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 473 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25 473
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

John Torous D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Torous sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 84–85 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 84 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86 84
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

John Torous is affiliated with Harvard Medical School in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of psychology, with particular emphasis on applied psychology, general health professions, experimental and cognitive psychology, public health, environmental and occupational health, and social psychology.

The main topics of their work include:

  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Schizophrenia research and treatment

John Torous has been a frequent contributor to several academic journals and publication venues. Notable venues with multiple publications include:

  • JMIR Mental Health
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • npj Digital Medicine
  • World Psychiatry
  • Schizophrenia Research

Among their recent papers are:

  • A meta-review of "lifestyle psychiatry": the role of exercise, smoking, diet and sleep in the prevention and treatment of mental disorders, 2020, World Psychiatry
  • Digital Mental Health and COVID-19: Using Technology Today to Accelerate the Curve on Access and Quality Tomorrow, 2020, JMIR Mental Health
  • The growing field of digital psychiatry: current evidence and the future of apps, social media, chatbots, and virtual reality, 2021, World Psychiatry
  • Social Media and Mental Health: Benefits, Risks, and Opportunities for Research and Practice, 2020, Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science
  • Artificial Intelligence for Mental Health Care: Clinical Applications, Barriers, Facilitators, and Artificial Wisdom, 2021, Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Joseph Firth
  • Matcheri S. Keshavan
  • Erica Camacho
  • John A. Naslund
  • Urvakhsh Meherwan Mehta

Best Publications

  • The Lancet Psychiatry Commission: a blueprint for protecting physical health in people with mental illness

    Joseph Firth;Joseph Firth;Joseph Firth;Najma Siddiqi;Ai Koyanagi;Ai Koyanagi;Ai Koyanagi;Dan J Siskind

  • The efficacy of smartphone-based mental health interventions for depressive symptoms: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

    Joseph Firth;John B Torous;Jennifer Nicholas;Rebekah Carney

  • Chatbots and Conversational Agents in Mental Health: A Review of the Psychiatric Landscape:

    Aditya Nrusimha Vaidyam;Hannah Wisniewski;John David Halamka;Matcheri S. Kashavan

  • Clinical review of user engagement with mental health smartphone apps: evidence, theory and improvements.

    John Torous;Jennifer Nicholas;Mark E Larsen;Mark E Larsen;Joseph Firth

  • New Tools for New Research in Psychiatry: A Scalable and Customizable Platform to Empower Data Driven Smartphone Research.

    John Torous;Mathew V Kiang;Jeanette Lorme;Jukka-Pekka Onnela

  • Can smartphone mental health interventions reduce symptoms of anxiety? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

    Joseph Firth;John Torous;Jennifer Nicholas;Rebekah Carney

  • The "online brain": how the Internet may be changing our cognition

    Joseph Firth;John B Torous;Brendon Stubbs;Josh A Firth

  • Social Media and Mental Health: Benefits, Risks, and Opportunities for Research and Practice.

    John A. Naslund;Ameya Bondre;John Torous;Kelly A. Aschbrenner

  • Dropout rates in clinical trials of smartphone apps for depressive symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

    John Torous;Jessica Lipschitz;Michelle Ng;Joseph Firth;Joseph Firth

  • Relapse prediction in schizophrenia through digital phenotyping: a pilot study.

    Ian Barnett;John Torous;Patrick Staples;Luis Sandoval

  • Mobile Phone Ownership and Endorsement of “mHealth” Among People With Psychosis: A Meta-analysis of Cross-sectional Studies

    Joseph Firth;Jack Cotter;John Torous;Sandra Bucci

  • Needed Innovation in Digital Health and Smartphone Applications for Mental Health: Transparency and Trust

    John Torous;Laura Weiss Roberts

  • The WPA-Lancet Psychiatry Commission on the Future of Psychiatry

    Dinesh Bhugra;Dinesh Bhugra;Allan Tasman;Soumitra Pathare;Stefan Priebe

  • Towards a consensus around standards for smartphone apps and digital mental health

    John Torous;Gerhard Andersson;Andrew Bertagnoli;Helen Christensen

  • Using science to sell apps: Evaluation of mental health app store quality claims

    Mark Erik Larsen;Kit Huckvale;Jennifer Nicholas;Jennifer Nicholas;John Torous

  • Smartphone ownership and interest in mobile applications to monitor symptoms of mental health conditions.

    John Torous;Rohn Friedman;Matcheri Keshavan

  • Smartphone Apps for Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review

    Joseph Firth;John B Torous

  • New dimensions and new tools to realize the potential of RDoC: digital phenotyping via smartphones and connected devices

    John B. Torous;J-P Onnela;Matcheri S Keshavan

Frequent Co-Authors

Matcheri S. Keshavan
Matcheri S. Keshavan Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Joseph Firth
Joseph Firth University of Manchester
Jukka-Pekka Onnela
Jukka-Pekka Onnela Harvard University
Helen Christensen
Helen Christensen University of New South Wales
Catherine M. DesRoches
Catherine M. DesRoches Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Theodore D. Cosco
Theodore D. Cosco University of Oxford
Jennifer Nicholas
Jennifer Nicholas London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
John A. Naslund
John A. Naslund Harvard University
Munmun De Choudhury
Munmun De Choudhury Georgia Institute of Technology
Laura Weiss Roberts
Laura Weiss Roberts Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a psychology degree in the USA opens doors to many rewarding career pathways, particularly in counseling and mental health services. Many students pursue online psychology or counseling programs, which can help meet educational and professional requirements across various states.

For those interested in becoming a licensed professional counselor (LPC), each state has unique licensure requirements. For example, if you are planning to practice in New Hampshire, it's important to understand the New Hampshire licensed professional counselor requirements. Similarly, studying in New Jersey requires meeting the New Jersey licensed professional counselor requirements, which may differ in terms of education, supervised experience, and examinations.

Aspiring counselors in New Mexico should review the lpc license requirements in New Mexico to ensure that their online degree program covers all mandates for licensure. In New York, prospective professionals should be aware of the lpc licensure requirements in New York since the process can be more complex, with specific educational and clinical training obligations.

Researching each state’s guidelines is essential when selecting your degree and planning your career, as these criteria can impact your ability to practice professionally.

Best Scientists Citing John Torous

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles