World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
113
Citations
50236
World Ranking
4924
National Ranking
2668

David C. Mohr publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David C. Mohr sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 479 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

David C. Mohr D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David C. Mohr sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 113 D-Index — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

David C. Mohr is affiliated with Northwestern University in the United States. Their research spans several intersecting fields, primarily focusing on health professions, psychology, and medicine. Key subfields in their work include general health professions, social psychology, applied psychology, public health, environmental and occupational health, and clinical psychology.

Mohr's main research topics encompass healthcare professionals' stress and burnout, digital mental health interventions, mental health research topics, mental health treatment and access, geriatric care and nursing homes, primary care and health outcomes, and healthcare policy and management.

Throughout their career, Mohr has contributed to multiple frequent publication venues. These include:

  • Journal of General Internal Medicine
  • BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
  • JAMA
  • Telemedicine Journal and e-Health
  • Medical Care

Selected recent papers authored or coauthored by Mohr highlight their focus on digital mental health and clinical approaches to mental health treatment. Notable publications include:

  • "Banbury Forum Consensus Statement on the Path Forward for Digital Mental Health Treatment," 2021, Psychiatric Services
  • "User characteristics and outcomes from a national digital mental health service: an observational study of registrants of the Australian MindSpot Clinic," 2020, The Lancet Digital Health
  • "Effect of a Digital Intervention on Depressive Symptoms in Patients With Comorbid Hypertension or Diabetes in Brazil and Peru," 2021, JAMA
  • "Uptake and effectiveness of a self-guided mobile app platform for college student mental health," 2021, Internet Interventions
  • "Management of Depression in Adults," 2024, JAMA (authored by Gregory E. Simon, noted for contextual reference)

Mohr has collaborated frequently with several researchers, indicating ongoing partnerships. Frequent coauthors include:

  • Seppo T. Rinne
  • Julia C. Prentice
  • Kaylee Payne Kruzan
  • Paul R. Conlin
  • Ekaterina Anderson

Best Publications

  • Major depressive disorder

    Christian Otte;Stefan M. Gold;Stefan M. Gold;Brenda W. Penninx;Carmine Maria Pariante

  • Depression and cortisol responses to psychological stress: A meta-analysis

    Heather M. Burke;Mary C. Davis;Christian Otte;David C. Mohr;David C. Mohr

  • Supportive Accountability: A Model for Providing Human Support to Enhance Adherence to eHealth Interventions

    David C Mohr;Pim Cuijpers;Kenneth Lehman

  • Mobile health technology evaluation: The mHealth evidence workshop

    Santosh Kumar;Wendy J. Nilsen;Amy Abernethy;Audie Atienza

  • Comparison of Pharmaceutical, Psychological, and Exercise Treatments for Cancer-Related Fatigue: A Meta-analysis

    Karen M. Mustian;Catherine M. Alfano;Charles Heckler;Amber S. Kleckner

  • Mobile Phone Sensor Correlates of Depressive Symptom Severity in Daily-Life Behavior: An Exploratory Study

    Sohrab Saeb;Mi Zhang;Christopher J Karr;Stephen M Schueller

  • Behavioral intervention technologies: Evidence review and recommendations for future research in mental health.

    David C. Mohr;Michelle Nicole Burns;Stephen M. Schueller;Gregory Clarke

  • Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Network Meta-analysis.

    Eirini Karyotaki;Eirini Karyotaki;Eirini Karyotaki;Orestis Efthimiou;Orestis Efthimiou;Clara Miguel;Clara Miguel;Frederic Maas Genannt Bermpohl

  • Personal Sensing: Understanding Mental Health Using Ubiquitous Sensors and Machine Learning.

    David C. Mohr;Mi Zhang;Stephen M. Schueller

  • Harnessing Context Sensing to Develop a Mobile Intervention for Depression

    Michelle Nicole Burns;Mark Begale;Jennifer Duffecy;Darren Gergle

  • Oral opioid therapy for chronic peripheral and central neuropathic pain.

    Michael C. Rowbotham;Lisa Twilling;Pamela S. Davies;Lori Reisner

  • The Selection and Design of Control Conditions for Randomized Controlled Trials of Psychological Interventions

    David C. Mohr;Bonnie Spring;Kenneth E. Freedland;Victoria Beckner

  • Clinical Depression Versus Distress Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Not Just a Question of Semantics

    Lawrence Fisher;Marilyn M. Skaff;Joseph T. Mullan;Patricia Arean

  • Effects of Hatha yoga and African dance on perceived stress, affect, and salivary cortisol.

    Jeremy West;Christian Otte;Kathleen Geher;Joe Johnson

  • Negative Outcome in Psychotherapy: A Critical Review

    David C. Mohr

  • Predictors of posttraumatic stress in police and other first responders.

    Charles R. Marmar;Charles R. Marmar;Shannon E. McCASLIN;Shannon E. McCASLIN;Thomas J. Metzler;Thomas J. Metzler;Suzanne Best

  • MS quality of life, depression, and fatigue improve after mindfulness training: A randomized trial

    P. Grossman;L. Kappos;H. Gensicke;M. D'Souza

  • A meta-analysis of cortisol response to challenge in human aging: importance of gender.

    Christian Otte;Stacey Hart;Stacey Hart;Thomas C. Neylan;Thomas C. Neylan;Charles R. Marmar;Charles R. Marmar

  • Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Efficacy of a Smartphone Intervention for Schizophrenia

    Dror Ben-Zeev;Christopher J. Brenner;Mark Begale;Jennifer Duffecy

  • Association between stressful life events and exacerbation in multiple sclerosis: a meta-analysis

    David C Mohr;Stacey L Hart;Laura Julian;Darcy Cox

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen M. Schueller
Stephen M. Schueller University of California, Irvine
Mark Meterko
Mark Meterko Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center
Gary J. Young
Gary J. Young Northeastern University
James F. Burgess
James F. Burgess Boston University
Pim Cuijpers
Pim Cuijpers Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Christian Otte
Christian Otte Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Konrad P. Kording
Konrad P. Kording University of Pennsylvania
Gerhard Andersson
Gerhard Andersson Linköping University
Thomas C. Neylan
Thomas C. Neylan University of California, San Francisco
Bonnie Spring
Bonnie Spring Northwestern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in studying Medicine in the USA, numerous related online degrees can complement or expand your career prospects in healthcare. Fields like nutrition have seen growing demand, and pursuing an online degree nutrition can equip you with expertise in dietetics, wellness, and preventive care—key aspects of modern healthcare.

For those seeking leadership positions or administrative roles, it's important to research which online healthcare administration programs have cahme accreditation? CAHME accreditation ensures your degree meets industry-recognized standards, boosting career prospects in hospital management and beyond.

Registered Nurses (RNs) aiming to advance their credentials often seek flexible programs like an rn to bsn without clinicals, allowing for career growth without on-site commitments. For higher-level nursing roles, you can consider a 1 year dnp program online, which accelerates your path toward advanced practice or leadership.

These online pathways offer flexible options for aspiring healthcare professionals, each opening different doors within the dynamic world of medicine.

Best Scientists Citing David C. Mohr

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles