World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
42
Citations
8346
World Ranking
4704
National Ranking
800

Richard Shillcock publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard Shillcock sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 164 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Richard Shillcock D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard Shillcock sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard Shillcock is affiliated with the University of Edinburgh in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple disciplines, primarily within psychology and computer science, with significant contributions in areas such as experimental and cognitive psychology, computer vision and pattern recognition, and cognitive neuroscience.

The scientist's work focuses on topics including reading and literacy development, language, metaphor and cognition, multisensory perception and integration, categorization, perception, and language. Additionally, their research covers image retrieval and classification techniques, handwritten text recognition techniques, and media, communication, and education.

Richard Shillcock has published in a variety of academic venues, reflecting the interdisciplinary nature of their research. Key publication venues include:

  • Cognition
  • Journal of East Asian Linguistics
  • Asian Culture and History
  • Attention Perception & Psychophysics
  • Grapholinguistics and its applications

Recent publications provide insight into the areas explored by Shillcock and collaborators. These include:

  • Systematicity in language and the fast and slow creation of writing systems: Understanding two types of non-arbitrary relations between orthographic characters and their canonical pronunciation (2022, Cognition)
  • Exploring meaning-sound systematicity in Korean (2022, Journal of East Asian Linguistics)
  • Quantifying Sound-Graphic Systematicity. Application to Multiple Phonographic Orthographies (2021, Grapholinguistics and its applications)
  • Quantified Grapho-Phonemic Systematicity in Korean Hangeul (2023, Asian Culture and History)
  • Small temporal asynchronies between the two eyes in binocular reading: Crosslinguistic data and the implications for ocular prevalence (2021, Attention Perception & Psychophysics)

Collaboration is a notable aspect of Shillcock's research activity, with frequent coauthors including Hana Jee, Mónica Tamariz, Ruomeng Zhu, Mateo Obregón, and Hamutal Kreiner. These collaborations indicate a focus on multidisciplinary approaches integrating linguistics, psychology, and computer science.

The research areas and topics suggest an interest in how language systems and perception interact with neural and cognitive processes, as well as the technological methods used to analyze text and images. The balance of psychological theory alongside computational methods underlines the interdisciplinary scope of their work.

Best Publications

  • Proceedings of the fourteenth annual conference of the cognitive science society

    Richard Shillcock;G Lindsey;J Levy;N Chater

  • Teaching Talk: Strategies for Production and Assessment

    Anne Anderson;Gillian Brown;Richard Shillcock;George Yule

  • Eye Movements Reveal the On-Line Computation of Lexical Probabilities During Reading

    Scott A. McDonald;Richard C. Shillcock

  • How arbitrary is language

    Padraic Monaghan;Richard C. Shillcock;Morten H. Christiansen;Simon Kirby

  • Rethinking the word frequency effect: the neglected role of distributional information in lexical processing.

    Scott A. McDonald;Richard C. Shillcock

  • Proceedings of the twentieth annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society

    Richard Shillcock;Padraic Monaghan

  • The recognition of words after their acoustic offsets in spontaneous speech: effects of subsequent context.

    Ellen Gurman Bard;Richard Shillcock;G. T. M. Altmann

  • Bootstrapping word boundaries: A bottom-up corpus-based approach to speech segmentation

    Paul Cairns;Richard Shillcock;Nick Chater;Joe Levy

  • Low-level predictive inference in reading: the influence of transitional probabilities on eye movements.

    Scott A. McDonald;Richard C. Shillcock

  • Eye-fixation behavior, lexical storage, and visual word recognition in a split processing model.

    Richard Shillcock;T. Mark Ellison;Padraic Monaghan

  • Slips of the tongue in the London-Lund corpus of spontaneous conversation

    Alan Garnham;Richard C. Shillcock;Gordon D. A. Brown;Andrew I. D. Mill

  • Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society

    Yu-Ju Chou;Richard Shillcock

  • Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference of the cognitive science society

    Marcus O’Toole;Jon Oberlander;Richard Shillcock

  • An anatomically constrained, stochastic model of eye movement control in reading.

    Scott A. McDonald;R. H. S. Carpenter;Richard C. Shillcock

  • Proceedings of EUROSPEECH-1991.

    R. J. Lickley;Richard Shillcock;Ellen Gurman Bard

  • Analysis of a Chinese phonetic compound database : Implications for orthographic processing

    Janet Hui-wen Hsiao;Richard Shillcock

  • Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society

    Richard Shillcock;Paul Cairns

  • Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society

    John Hicks;Jon Oberlander;Richard Shillcock

  • Cognitive models of speech processing : the Second Sperlonga Meeting

    Gerry T. M. Altmann;Richard Shillcock

  • Lexical hypotheses in continuous speech

    Richard Shillcock

  • Proceedings of the Twenty Seventh Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society

    Janet Hui-wen Hsiao;Richard Shillcock

Frequent Co-Authors

Padraic Monaghan
Padraic Monaghan Lancaster University
Nick Chater
Nick Chater University of Warwick
Julia Simner
Julia Simner University of Sussex
Antonella Sorace
Antonella Sorace University of Edinburgh
Michal Lavidor
Michal Lavidor Bar-Ilan University
Gerry T. M. Altmann
Gerry T. M. Altmann University of Connecticut
Martin J. Pickering
Martin J. Pickering University of Edinburgh
Jon Oberlander
Jon Oberlander University of Edinburgh
Alexander P. Leff
Alexander P. Leff University College London
Morten H. Christiansen
Morten H. Christiansen Cornell University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Social Sciences and Humanities opens diverse career pathways, from clinical psychology to educational leadership. Many students now opt for flexible learning, advancing their education while balancing work or family commitments.

For those interested in clinical psychology or counseling, top-ranked best psyd programs and online masters mft programs offer robust training in mental health practice and marriage and family therapy, respectively. These online options make it possible to gain specialized credentials without relocating.

If affordability is key, you’ll find a variety of cheap psychology masters programs, making advanced degrees accessible for a wider range of students. Likewise, for educators and administrators seeking leadership roles, edd online programs are available in accelerated formats to help fast-track career advancement.

Pursuing these online degrees not only increases your knowledge and skills but also paves the way for roles in mental health, education, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Richard Shillcock

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles