World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
39
Citations
12871
World Ranking
8386
National Ranking
496

Neuroscience

D-Index
39
Citations
12857
World Ranking
8203
National Ranking
242

Erik D. Reichle publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Erik D. Reichle sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 131 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Erik D. Reichle D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Erik D. Reichle sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Erik D. Reichle is a researcher affiliated with Macquarie University in Australia. Their work spans the fields of psychology and computer science, with significant contributions in developmental and educational psychology, cognitive neuroscience, artificial intelligence, experimental and cognitive psychology, and human-computer interaction.

Their research primarily focuses on topics related to reading and literacy development, text readability and simplification, neurobiology of language and bilingualism, second language acquisition and learning, gaze tracking and assistive technology, language, metaphor, and cognition, as well as EEG and brain-computer interfaces.

Erik D. Reichle has published extensively in several key academic venues. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition
  • Reading Research Quarterly
  • Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • Scientific Studies of Reading
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology General

Key frequent co-authors in their work are:

  • Lili Yu
  • Aaron Veldre
  • Sally Andrews
  • Diane Caroline Mézière
  • Titus von der Malsburg

Some of the recent papers by Erik D. Reichle include:

  • Using Eye-Tracking Measures to Predict Reading Comprehension, 2023, Reading Research Quarterly
  • Dynamic reading in a digital age: new insights on cognition, 2023, Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  • Using Eye Movements to Study the Reading of Subtitles in Video, 2020, Scientific Studies of Reading
  • The effect of contextual plausibility on word skipping during reading, 2020, Cognition
  • A corpus-based versus experimental examination of word- and character-frequency effects in Chinese reading: Theoretical implications for models of reading, 2020, Journal of Experimental Psychology General

Erik D. Reichle has also contributed to book publications with established academic presses. They have published one book with Oxford University Press titled Computational Models of Reading (2021) and one book with Cambridge University Press titled The Psychology of Reading (2024).

Best Publications

  • Toward a model of eye movement control in reading.

    Erik D. Reichle;Alexander Pollatsek;Donald L. Fisher;Keith Rayner

  • The E-Z reader model of eye-movement control in reading: comparisons to other models

    Erik D. Reichle;Keith Rayner;Alexander Pollatsek

  • Meta-awareness, perceptual decoupling and the wandering mind

    Jonathan W. Schooler;Jonathan Smallwood;Kalina Christoff;Todd C. Handy

  • Using E-Z reader to model the effects of higher level language processing on eye movements during reading

    Erik D. Reichle;Tessa Warren;Kerry McConnell

  • Zoning Out while Reading: Evidence for Dissociations between Experience and Metaconsciousness.

    Jonathan W. Schooler;Erik D. Reichle;David V. Halpern

  • Eye Movements During Mindless Reading

    Erik D. Reichle;Andrew E. Reineberg;Jonathan W. Schooler

  • The effect of word frequency, word predictability, and font difficulty on the eye movements of young and older readers.

    Keith Rayner;Erik D. Reichle;Michael J. Stroud;Carrick C. Williams

  • Working memory and executive function: evidence from neuroimaging

    Patricia A. Carpenter;Marcel Adam Just;Erik D. Reichle

  • The effects of frequency and predictability on eye fixations in reading: implications for the E-Z Reader model.

    Keith Rayner;Jane Ashby;Alexander Pollatsek;Erik D. Reichle

  • Tests of the E-Z Reader Model: Exploring the Interface between Cognition and Eye-Movement Control.

    Alexander Pollatsek;Erik D. Reichle;Keith Rayner

  • E-Z Reader: A cognitive-control, serial-attention model of eye-movement behavior during reading

    Erik D. Reichle;Alexander Pollatsek;Keith Rayner

  • Morphology in Word Identification: A Word-Experience Model That Accounts for Morpheme Frequency Effects

    Erik D. Reichle;Charles A. Perfetti

  • Eye movements in reading and information processing: Keith Rayner’s 40 year legacy

    Charles Jr Clifton;Fernanda Ferreira;John M. Henderson;Albrecht W. Inhoff

  • The neural bases of strategy and skill in sentence-picture verification.

    Erik D. Reichle;Patricia A. A. Carpenter;Marcel Adam Just

  • Eye movement control in reading: accounting for initial fixation locations and refixations within the E-Z Reader model.

    Erik D Reichle;Keith Rayner;Alexander Pollatsek

  • Direct lexical control of eye movements in reading: evidence from a survival analysis of fixation durations.

    Eyal M. Reingold;Erik D. Reichle;Mackenzie G. Glaholt;Heather Sheridan

  • Models of the reading process

    Keith Rayner;Erik D. Reichle

  • Using E-Z Reader to simulate eye movements in nonreading tasks: a unified framework for understanding the eye-mind link

    Erik D. Reichle;Alexander Pollatsek;Keith Rayner

  • Encoding multiple words simultaneously in reading is implausible.

    Erik D. Reichle;Simon Paul Liversedge;Alexander Pollatsek;Keith Rayner

  • Lost in the Sauce The Effects of Alcohol on Mind Wandering

    Michael A. Sayette;Erik D. Reichle;Jonathan W. Schooler

  • The E-Z Reader model of eye movement control in reading

    Alexander Pollatsek;Keith Rayner;Keith Rayner;Erik Reichle

Frequent Co-Authors

Keith Rayner
Keith Rayner University of California, San Diego
Alexander Pollatsek
Alexander Pollatsek University of Massachusetts Amherst
Simon Paul Liversedge
Simon Paul Liversedge University of Central Lancashire
Jonathan W. Schooler
Jonathan W. Schooler University of California, Santa Barbara
Denis Drieghe
Denis Drieghe University of Southampton
Eyal M. Reingold
Eyal M. Reingold University of Toronto
Michael A. Sayette
Michael A. Sayette University of Pittsburgh
Sarah J. White
Sarah J. White University of Leicester
Marcel Adam Just
Marcel Adam Just Carnegie Mellon University
Patricia A. Carpenter
Patricia A. Carpenter Carnegie Mellon University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Students interested in neuroscience often explore diverse educational and career options. Many focus on degrees and programs that offer flexibility, strong earning potential, and financial accessibility. If you want to fast-track your education, consider accelerated bachelors programs, which can help you complete your studies in a shorter time than traditional programs.

Exploring the best bachelor degrees to get and the most profitable degrees is also important if you want to align your studies with high-demand careers. Fields linked to neuroscience, such as biomedical engineering, psychology, and data science, often appear on lists of top-paying majors.

When choosing an online degree, it’s crucial to consider affordability. Many online colleges that accept financial aid enable students to lower their out-of-pocket expenses, making it more feasible to pursue quality education in neuroscience or related fields. Weigh your options carefully to find the best fit for your goals and budget.

Best Scientists Citing Erik D. Reichle

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles