World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
James M. McQueen

James M. McQueen

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
66
Citations
16273
World Ranking
2710
National Ranking
143

James M. McQueen publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James M. McQueen sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 316 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

James M. McQueen D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James M. McQueen sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - Member of Academia Europaea

Overview

James M. McQueen is affiliated with Radboud University in the Netherlands and has contributed extensively to research in psychology and neuroscience. Their work spans multiple subfields, including cognitive neuroscience, developmental and educational psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, statistics and probability, as well as linguistics and language.

Their studies prominently address topics such as neurobiology of language and bilingualism, reading and literacy development, phonetics and phonology research, linguistic variation and morphology, language development and disorders, hearing loss and rehabilitation, and the intersection of neuroscience and music perception.

Frequent coauthors in their research include Kristin Lemhöfer, Florian Hintz, Antje S. Meyer, Hans Rutger Bosker, and Guillén Fernández.

Key recent publications by James M. McQueen include:

  • A behavioural dataset for studying individual differences in language skills (2020, Scientific Data)
  • Phonetic convergence to non-native speech: Acoustic and perceptual evidence (2021, Journal of Phonetics)
  • Between-language competition as a driving force in foreign language attrition (2020, Cognition)
  • Neural tracking of speech envelope does not unequivocally reflect intelligibility (2023, NeuroImage)
  • Protocol of the Healthy Brain Study: An accessible resource for understanding the human brain and how it dynamically and individually operates in its bio-social context (2021, PLoS ONE)

Their work has been frequently published in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), PLoS ONE, Journal of Phonetics, Cognition, and Bilingualism Language and Cognition.

James M. McQueen was recognized as a Member of Academia Europaea in 2018.

Best Publications

  • Perceptual learning in speech.

    Dennis Norris;James M. McQueen;Anne Cutler

  • Merging information in speech recognition: feedback is never necessary.

    Dennis Norris;James M. McQueen;Anne Cutler

  • Shortlist B: A Bayesian model of continuous speech recognition

    Dennis Norris;James M. McQueen

  • The role of prosodic boundaries in the resolution of lexical embedding in speech comprehension

    Anne Pier Salverda;Delphine Dahan;James M. McQueen

  • Segmentation of Continuous Speech Using Phonotactics

    James M. McQueen

  • The specificity of perceptual learning in speech processing

    Frank Eisner;James M. McQueen

  • The Possible-Word Constraint in the Segmentation of Continuous Speech

    Dennis Norris;James M. McQueen;Anne Cutler;Sally Butterfield

  • The tug of war between phonological, semantic and shape information in language-mediated visual search

    Falk Huettig;James M. McQueen

  • Competition and segmentation in spoken word recognition

    Dennis Norris;James M. McQueen;Anne Cutler

  • Phonological abstraction in the mental lexicon

    James M. McQueen;Anne Cutler;Dennis Norris

  • Competition in spoken word recognition: Spotting words in other words

    James M. McQueen;Dennis Norris;Anne Cutler

  • Foreign subtitles help but native-language subtitles harm foreign speech perception.

    Holger Mitterer;James M. McQueen

  • Is Compensation for Coarticulation Mediated by the Lexicon

    Mark A. Pitt;James M. McQueen

  • Vowel harmony and speech segmentation in Finnish

    Kari Suomi;James M. McQueen;Anne Cutler

  • Prosodic influences on consonant production in Dutch: Effects of prosodic boundaries, phrasal accent and lexical stress

    Taehong Cho;James M. McQueen

  • Perceptual learning in speech: Stability over time (L)

    Frank Eisner;James M. McQueen

  • Neural mechanisms for voice recognition

    Attila Andics;Attila Andics;James M. McQueen;Karl Magnus Petersson;Viktor Gál;Viktor Gál

  • Prosodically driven phonetic detail in speech processing: The case of domain-initial strengthening in English

    Taehong Cho;James M. McQueen;Ethan A. Cox

  • Lexical influence in phonetic decision-making: Evidence from subcategorical mismatches

    James M. McQueen;Dennis Norris;Anne Cutler

  • Morphology in word recognition

    James M. McQueen;Anne Cutler

  • Processing resyllabified words in French

    Elsa Spinelli;Elsa Spinelli;James M McQueen;Anne Cutler

Frequent Co-Authors

Anne Cutler
Anne Cutler Western Sydney University
Dennis Norris
Dennis Norris University of Cambridge
Holger Mitterer
Holger Mitterer University of Malta
Peter Hagoort
Peter Hagoort Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics
Janet G. van Hell
Janet G. van Hell Pennsylvania State University
Ludo Verhoeven
Ludo Verhoeven Radboud University
Karl Magnus Petersson
Karl Magnus Petersson University of Algarve
Niels O. Schiller
Niels O. Schiller Leiden University
Ardi Roelofs
Ardi Roelofs Radboud University
Jean Vroomen
Jean Vroomen Tilburg University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens the door to a variety of online degrees and rewarding career options. Many students explore online social work programs, which share foundational skills with psychology. For example, the most valuable online social work programs in Ohio and most valuable online social work degrees in Tennessee are popular choices for those looking to work with diverse communities or advocate for mental health.

If you are interested in robust social work training, the most valuable online social work programs in Texas offer flexible learning and connections to state-specific resources. These programs can lead to roles in counseling, school systems, or healthcare environments.

For those seeking a specialized credential, becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA) is an excellent path. The Vermont bcba education requirements provide a clear example of the education and certification steps needed to enter this high-demand field, supporting children and adults with behavioral needs.

Best Scientists Citing James M. McQueen

Trending Scientists