World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
James M. McQueen

James M. McQueen

Last Updated:

D-Index & Metrics

?
Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 66 2708 2481 143 137 316 16273

James M. McQueen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by James M. McQueen between 1989 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. James M. McQueen published across 37 years, from 1989 to 2025, averaging 9.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2014. 18 of the 355 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1989 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2014. 1989: 1 publication 1990: 1 publication 1991: 2 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 5 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 10 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 10 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 8 publications 2006: 12 publications 2007: 15 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 16 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 20 publications 2012: 17 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 21 publications 2015: 16 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 17 publications 2018: 21 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 7 publications
1989 2025

355 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
James M. McQueen: publications per year, 1989 to 2025
Year Publications
1989 1
1990 1
1991 2
1992 1
1993 1
1994 5
1995 6
1996 2
1997 3
1998 5
1999 6
2000 10
2001 8
2002 6
2003 10
2004 1
2005 8
2006 12
2007 15
2008 9
2009 16
2010 15
2011 20
2012 17
2013 16
2014 21
2015 16
2016 14
2017 17
2018 21
2019 16
2020 8
2021 13
2022 7
2023 8
2024 11
2025 7
Total 355
Download as CSV

James M. McQueen publications per year - data summary

  • James M. McQueen, a Psychology scholar from Radboud University, has 355 publications recorded across 37 years, from 1989 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1989 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive years are 2014 and 2018, with 21 publications each.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1989, 1990, 1992, 1993 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • The rate of publication averages 9.6 papers per year over the whole span, or 9.6 per year counting only the 37 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 46 publications, 13% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1989-2001: 51 publications (3.9 per year); 2002-2014: 166 publications (12.8 per year); 2015-2025: 138 publications (12.5 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

James M. McQueen publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James M. McQueen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 311–320 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 316 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100 316
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

James M. McQueen publication distribution in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 69 ranges running from 31–40 to 705+ publications.
  • James M. McQueen, a Psychology scholar from Radboud University, records 316 publications - the 89th percentile of the discipline.
  • 89% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than James M. McQueen, and about 11% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 151–160 publications range, and James M. McQueen ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 101–110 publications, holding 736 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 72% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 705 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

James M. McQueen D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James M. McQueen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 66–67 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218 66
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

James M. McQueen D-index placement in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 58 ranges running from 30–31 to 144+ D-Index.
  • James M. McQueen, a Psychology scholar from Radboud University, records 66 D-Index - the 77th percentile of the discipline.
  • 77% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than James M. McQueen, and about 23% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 48–49 D-Index range, and James M. McQueen ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32–33 D-Index, holding 702 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 68% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 58–59 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - Member of Academia Europaea

Overview

James M. McQueen is affiliated with Radboud University in the Netherlands and has contributed extensively to research in psychology and neuroscience. Their work spans multiple subfields, including cognitive neuroscience, developmental and educational psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, statistics and probability, as well as linguistics and language.

Their studies prominently address topics such as neurobiology of language and bilingualism, reading and literacy development, phonetics and phonology research, linguistic variation and morphology, language development and disorders, hearing loss and rehabilitation, and the intersection of neuroscience and music perception.

Frequent coauthors in their research include Kristin Lemhöfer, Florian Hintz, Antje S. Meyer, Hans Rutger Bosker, and Guillén Fernández.

Key recent publications by James M. McQueen include:

  • A behavioural dataset for studying individual differences in language skills (2020, Scientific Data)
  • Phonetic convergence to non-native speech: Acoustic and perceptual evidence (2021, Journal of Phonetics)
  • Between-language competition as a driving force in foreign language attrition (2020, Cognition)
  • Neural tracking of speech envelope does not unequivocally reflect intelligibility (2023, NeuroImage)
  • Protocol of the Healthy Brain Study: An accessible resource for understanding the human brain and how it dynamically and individually operates in its bio-social context (2021, PLoS ONE)

Their work has been frequently published in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), PLoS ONE, Journal of Phonetics, Cognition, and Bilingualism Language and Cognition.

James M. McQueen was recognized as a Member of Academia Europaea in 2018.

Best Publications

  • Perceptual learning in speech.

    Dennis Norris;James M. McQueen;Anne Cutler

  • Merging information in speech recognition: feedback is never necessary.

    Dennis Norris;James M. McQueen;Anne Cutler

  • Shortlist B: A Bayesian model of continuous speech recognition

    Dennis Norris;James M. McQueen

  • The role of prosodic boundaries in the resolution of lexical embedding in speech comprehension

    Anne Pier Salverda;Delphine Dahan;James M. McQueen

  • Segmentation of Continuous Speech Using Phonotactics

    James M. McQueen

  • The specificity of perceptual learning in speech processing

    Frank Eisner;James M. McQueen

  • The Possible-Word Constraint in the Segmentation of Continuous Speech

    Dennis Norris;James M. McQueen;Anne Cutler;Sally Butterfield

  • The tug of war between phonological, semantic and shape information in language-mediated visual search

    Falk Huettig;James M. McQueen

  • Competition and segmentation in spoken word recognition

    Dennis Norris;James M. McQueen;Anne Cutler

  • Phonological abstraction in the mental lexicon

    James M. McQueen;Anne Cutler;Dennis Norris

  • Competition in spoken word recognition: Spotting words in other words

    James M. McQueen;Dennis Norris;Anne Cutler

  • Foreign subtitles help but native-language subtitles harm foreign speech perception.

    Holger Mitterer;James M. McQueen

  • Is Compensation for Coarticulation Mediated by the Lexicon

    Mark A. Pitt;James M. McQueen

  • Vowel harmony and speech segmentation in Finnish

    Kari Suomi;James M. McQueen;Anne Cutler

  • Prosodic influences on consonant production in Dutch: Effects of prosodic boundaries, phrasal accent and lexical stress

    Taehong Cho;James M. McQueen

  • Perceptual learning in speech: Stability over time (L)

    Frank Eisner;James M. McQueen

  • Neural mechanisms for voice recognition

    Attila Andics;Attila Andics;James M. McQueen;Karl Magnus Petersson;Viktor Gál;Viktor Gál

  • Prosodically driven phonetic detail in speech processing: The case of domain-initial strengthening in English

    Taehong Cho;James M. McQueen;Ethan A. Cox

  • Lexical influence in phonetic decision-making: Evidence from subcategorical mismatches

    James M. McQueen;Dennis Norris;Anne Cutler

  • Morphology in word recognition

    James M. McQueen;Anne Cutler

  • Processing resyllabified words in French

    Elsa Spinelli;Elsa Spinelli;James M McQueen;Anne Cutler

Frequent Co-Authors

Anne Cutler
Anne Cutler Western Sydney University
Dennis Norris
Dennis Norris University of Cambridge
Holger Mitterer
Holger Mitterer University of Malta
Peter Hagoort
Peter Hagoort Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics
Janet G. van Hell
Janet G. van Hell Pennsylvania State University
Falk Huettig
Falk Huettig Max Planck Society
Ludo Verhoeven
Ludo Verhoeven Radboud University
Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen
Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen Radboud University
Karl Magnus Petersson
Karl Magnus Petersson University of Algarve
Zoltán Vidnyánszky
Zoltán Vidnyánszky University of Vienna

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens the door to a variety of online degrees and rewarding career options. Many students explore online social work programs, which share foundational skills with psychology. For example, the most valuable online social work programs in Ohio and most valuable online social work degrees in Tennessee are popular choices for those looking to work with diverse communities or advocate for mental health.

If you are interested in robust social work training, the most valuable online social work programs in Texas offer flexible learning and connections to state-specific resources. These programs can lead to roles in counseling, school systems, or healthcare environments.

For those seeking a specialized credential, becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA) is an excellent path. The Vermont bcba education requirements provide a clear example of the education and certification steps needed to enter this high-demand field, supporting children and adults with behavioral needs.

Best Scientists Citing James M. McQueen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles