World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
47
Citations
10218
World Ranking
6120
National Ranking
621

M. Gareth Gaskell publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M. Gareth Gaskell sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 125 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

M. Gareth Gaskell D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M. Gareth Gaskell sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

M. Gareth Gaskell is affiliated with the University of York in the United Kingdom. Their research centers on cognitive neuroscience and psychology, with a significant focus on topics related to sleep, memory, and language processing.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Neuroscience
  • Psychology

Subfields where their work is concentrated are:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence

The primary topics covered in their research encompass:

  • Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Reading and Literacy Development
  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Sleep and related disorders
  • Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Language Development and Disorders

Frequent publication venues for M. Gareth Gaskell include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Memory and Language
  • Cognition
  • Royal Society Open Science
  • Cerebral Cortex

They have collaborated repeatedly with several coauthors, including:

  • Scott A. Cairney
  • Lisa Henderson
  • Victoria C. P. Knowland
  • Elaine van Rijn
  • Matthew HC Mak

Some of their recent publications are:

  • The relationship between sentence comprehension and lexical-semantic retuning, 2020, Journal of Memory and Language
  • Targeted memory reactivation during sleep can induce forgetting of overlapping memories, 2022, Learning & Memory
  • Word-meaning priming extends beyond homonyms, 2022, Cognition
  • Sleep-dependent consolidation in children with comprehension and vocabulary weaknesses: it'll be alright on the night?, 2020, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
  • Episodic memory and sleep are involved in the maintenance of context-specific lexical information., 2023, Journal of Experimental Psychology General

Best Publications

  • Integrating Form and Meaning: A Distributed Model of Speech Perception.

    M. Gareth Gaskell;William D. Marslen-Wilson

  • A complementary systems account of word learning: neural and behavioural evidence

    Matthew H. Davis;M. Gareth Gaskell

  • Sleep Spindle Activity is Associated with the Integration of New Memories and Existing Knowledge

    Jakke Tamminen;Jessica D. Payne;Robert Stickgold;Erin J. Wamsley

  • Sleep-Associated Changes in the Mental Representation of Spoken Words

    Nicolas Dumay;M. Gareth Gaskell

  • The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics

    M. Gareth Gaskell;Gerry T. M. Altmann

  • Lexical competition and the acquisition of novel words

    M.Gareth Gaskell;Nicolas Dumay

  • Learning and consolidation of novel spoken words

    Matthew H. Davis;Anna Maria Di Betta;Mark J. E. Macdonald;M. Gareth Gaskell

  • Representation and competition in the perception of spoken words

    M. Gareth Gaskell;William D. Marslen-Wilson

  • Leading up the lexical garden path: Segmentation and ambiguity in spoken word recognition

    Matthew H. Davis;William D. Marslen-Wilson;M. Gareth Gaskell

  • Modelling the effects of semantic ambiguity in word recognition

    Jennifer M. Rodd;M. Gareth Gaskell;William D. Marslen-Wilson

  • Consolidation of vocabulary is associated with sleep in children

    Lisa-Marie Henderson;Anna R. Weighall;Helen Brown;M. Gareth Gaskell

  • Reading spoken words: Orthographic effects in auditory priming

    Céline Chéreau;M. Gareth Gaskell;Nicolas Dumay

  • Ambiguity, competition, and blending in spoken word recognition

    M. Gareth Gaskell;William D. Marslen–Wilson

  • A consensus-based transparency checklist

    Balazs Aczel;Barnabas Szaszi;Alexandra Sarafoglou;Zoltan Kekecs

  • Lexical Ambiguity Resolution and Spoken Word Recognition: Bridging the Gap

    M.Gareth Gaskell;William D. Marslen-Wilson

  • Novel word integration in the mental lexicon: Evidence from unmasked and masked semantic priming:

    Jakke Tamminen;M. Gareth Gaskell

  • Learning new meanings for old words: effects of semantic relatedness

    Jennifer M. Rodd;Richard Berriman;Matt Landau;Theresa Lee

  • A connectionist model of phonological representation in speech perception

    M. Gareth Gaskell;Mary Hare;William D. Marslen-Wilson

  • Newly learned spoken words show long-term lexical competition effects

    Jakke Tamminen;M. Gareth Gaskell

  • Accent modulates access to word meaning: Evidence for a speaker-model account of spoken word recognition.

    Zhenguang Garry Cai;Zhenguang Garry Cai;Rebecca A. Gilbert;Matthew H. Davis;M. Gareth Gaskell

  • Modelling regressive and progressive effects of assimilation in speech perception

    M.Gareth Gaskell

Frequent Co-Authors

Matthew H. Davis
Matthew H. Davis University of Cambridge
William D. Marslen-Wilson
William D. Marslen-Wilson University of Cambridge
Jennifer M. Rodd
Jennifer M. Rodd University College London
Scott O. Lilienfeld
Scott O. Lilienfeld Emory University
Matthias Schlesewsky
Matthias Schlesewsky University of South Australia
Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky
Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky University of South Australia
Courtenay Frazier Norbury
Courtenay Frazier Norbury University College London
Robert T. Knight
Robert T. Knight University of California, Berkeley
Alexandra M. Freund
Alexandra M. Freund University of Zurich
Dolores Albarracín
Dolores Albarracín University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees opens doors to diverse career opportunities in mental health, education, research, and beyond. Many students pursue online programs for flexibility and a tailored learning experience, but it’s important to understand the professional requirements tied to your chosen career path.

If you aspire to become a therapist, requirements can vary by state and often include earning a master’s degree, gaining supervised clinical experience, and passing a licensure exam. For instance, you can read more about licensed therapist requirements in St. Petersburg and the journey to licensed therapist requirements in Stockton.

If you’re considering becoming a licensed therapist in Tampa or want to know how to become a licensed therapist in Toledo, these city-specific guides highlight core steps like academic credentials, fieldwork, and licensing processes.

Online degree pathways can pave the way to licensure, but always check your state’s rules. Careful planning can help you efficiently navigate requirements and shape a fulfilling role in the field of psychology.

Best Scientists Citing M. Gareth Gaskell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles