World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 48 5795 5385 594 564 121 17611

Kathleen Rastle publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Kathleen Rastle between 1994 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kathleen Rastle published across 32 years, from 1994 to 2025, averaging 5.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2025. 31 of the 162 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2025. 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 4 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 3 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 15 publications 2025: 16 publications
1994 2025

162 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Kathleen Rastle: publications per year, 1994 to 2025
Year Publications
1994 1
1995 0
1996 1
1997 0
1998 1
1999 4
2000 4
2001 1
2002 3
2003 4
2004 4
2005 4
2006 4
2007 3
2008 4
2009 3
2010 8
2011 6
2012 6
2013 6
2014 3
2015 8
2016 3
2017 9
2018 6
2019 9
2020 6
2021 10
2022 6
2023 4
2024 15
2025 16
Total 162
Download as CSV

Kathleen Rastle publications per year - data summary

  • Kathleen Rastle, a Psychology scholar from Royal Holloway University of London, has 162 publications recorded across 32 years, from 1994 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1994 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2025, with 16 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1994, 1996, 1998 and 2001, with 1 publication each.
  • 2 of the 32 years in the span carry no publications at all (1995 and 1997).
  • The rate of publication averages 5.1 papers per year over the whole span, or 5.4 per year counting only the 30 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 51 publications, 31% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1994-2004: 23 publications (2.1 per year); 2005-2015: 55 publications (5.0 per year); 2016-2025: 84 publications (8.4 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Kathleen Rastle publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kathleen Rastle sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 121 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670 121
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Kathleen Rastle publication distribution in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 69 ranges running from 31–40 to 705+ publications.
  • Kathleen Rastle, a Psychology scholar from Royal Holloway University of London, records 121 publications - the 33rd percentile of the discipline.
  • 33% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Kathleen Rastle, and about 67% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 151–160 publications range, and Kathleen Rastle ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 101–110 publications, holding 736 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 72% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 705 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Kathleen Rastle D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kathleen Rastle sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487 48
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Kathleen Rastle D-index placement in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 58 ranges running from 30–31 to 144+ D-Index.
  • Kathleen Rastle, a Psychology scholar from Royal Holloway University of London, records 48 D-Index - the 49th percentile of the discipline.
  • 49% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Kathleen Rastle, and about 51% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 48–49 D-Index range, and Kathleen Rastle falls inside that same range.
  • The most crowded range is 32–33 D-Index, holding 702 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 68% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 58–59 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - Member of Academia Europaea
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom University of London
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom University of London
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom University of London
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom University of London

Overview

Kathleen Rastle is affiliated with Royal Holloway University of London in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily falls within the field of Psychology, with a specific focus on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Artificial Intelligence, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Statistics and Probability.

Their scholarly work extensively addresses topics including Reading and Literacy Development, Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism, Text Readability and Simplification, Second Language Acquisition and Learning, Cognitive and Developmental Aspects of Mathematical Skills, Writing and Handwriting Education, and Language Development and Disorders.

Among their recent publications are:

  • Sleep deprivation and memory: Meta-analytic reviews of studies on sleep deprivation before and after learning., 2021, Psychological Bulletin
  • The Dramatic Impact of Explicit Instruction on Learning to Read in a New Writing System, 2021, Psychological Science
  • What is semantic diversity and why does it facilitate visual word recognition?, 2020, Behavior Research Methods
  • Finding the man amongst many: A developmental perspective on mechanisms of morphological decomposition, 2021, Cognition
  • Prediction as a basis for skilled reading: insights from modern language models, 2022, Royal Society Open Science

Their frequent co-authors include Joanne Taylor, Clare Lally, Benedetta Cevoli, Maria Korochkina, and Marco Marelli.

Key publication venues where their work appears regularly include:

  • Journal of Memory and Language
  • Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
  • Psychological Science
  • Cognition
  • Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

Kathleen Rastle has been recognized as a Member of Academia Europaea since 2018 and holds the title of Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom, affiliated with the University of London.

Best Publications

  • DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud.

    Max Coltheart;Kathleen Rastle;Conrad Perry;Robyn Langdon

  • Ending the reading wars: reading acquisition from novice to expert

    Anne Castles;Kathleen Rastle;Kate Nation

  • The broth in my brother's brothel: morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition.

    Kathleen Rastle;Matthew H. Davis;Boris New

  • 358,534 nonwords: The ARC Nonword Database

    Kathleen Rastle;Jonathan Harrington;Max Coltheart

  • Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time-course study

    Kathleen Rastle;Matt H. Davis;William D. Marslen-Wilson;Lorraine K. Tyler

  • Serial processing in reading aloud: Evidence for dual-route models of reading.

    Max Coltheart;Kathleen Rastle

  • Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography

    Kathleen Rastle;Matthew H. Davis

  • The British Lexicon Project: lexical decision data for 28,730 monosyllabic and disyllabic English words

    Emmanuel Keuleers;Paula Lacey;Kathleen Rastle;Marc Brysbaert

  • Can cognitive models explain brain activation during word and pseudoword reading? A meta-analysis of 36 neuroimaging studies.

    J. S. H. Taylor;Kathleen Rastle;Matthew H. Davis

  • Serial and strategic effects in reading aloud

    Kathleen Rastle;Max Coltheart

  • Leading up the lexical garden path: Segmentation and ambiguity in spoken word recognition

    Matthew H. Davis;William D. Marslen-Wilson;M. Gareth Gaskell

  • Masked phonological priming effects in English: are they real? Do they matter?

    Kathleen Rastle;Marc Brysbaert

  • Fell primes fall, but does bell prime ball? Masked priming with irregularly-inflected primes

    Davide Crepaldi;Kathleen Rastle;Max Coltheart;Lyndsey Nickels

  • Smart phone, smart science: how the use of smartphones can revolutionize research in cognitive science.

    Stephane Dufau;Jon Andoni Duñabeitia;Carmen Moret-Tatay;Aileen McGonigal

  • Priming the Tip of the Tongue: Effects of Prior Processing on Word Retrieval in Young and Older Adults

    Kathleen G. Rastle;Deborah M. Burke

  • ERP Evidence of Morphological Analysis from Orthography: A Masked Priming Study

    Aureliu Lavric;Amanda Clapp;Kathleen Rastle

  • Whammies and double whammies: The effect of length on nonword reading

    Kathleen Rastle;Max Coltheart

  • The place of morphology in learning to read in English.

    Kathleen Rastle

  • Lexical and Nonlexical Print-to-Sound Translation of Disyllabic Words and Nonwords

    Kathleen Rastle;Max Coltheart

  • Is there a ‘fete’ in ‘fetish’? Effects of orthographic opacity on morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition

    Samantha F. McCormick;Kathleen Rastle;Matthew H. Davis

  • Ending the Reading Wars: Reading Acquisition From Novice to Expert (vol 19, pg 5, 2018)

    A Castles;K Rastle;K Nation

Frequent Co-Authors

Matthew H. Davis
Matthew H. Davis University of Cambridge
Max Coltheart
Max Coltheart Macquarie University
Marc Brysbaert
Marc Brysbaert Ghent University
Stephen J. Lupker
Stephen J. Lupker University of Western Ontario
Lyndsey Nickels
Lyndsey Nickels Macquarie University
Lorraine K. Tyler
Lorraine K. Tyler University of Cambridge
Kate Nation
Kate Nation University of Oxford
Derek Besner
Derek Besner University of Waterloo
Anne Castles
Anne Castles Macquarie University
Padraic Monaghan
Padraic Monaghan Lancaster University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology opens doors to numerous online programs and career pathways, especially in the field of counseling. Many students aspire to become Licensed Professional Counselors (LPCs), a role that requires both academic qualifications and state-specific licensure.

Online degrees can help you meet the educational requirements, but each U.S. state has unique steps for licensure. For instance, the Colorado licensed professional counselor requirements detail specific supervised hours and examinations. Similarly, reviewing the Connecticut licensed professional counselor requirements can help you understand the necessary coursework and internships.

Those considering the East Coast should explore the lpc license requirements in Delaware, while students planning to work in the South can read about the Florida licensed professional counselor requirements.

Before choosing a program, review your state’s requirements and ensure your online degree will meet the criteria for licensure. This preparation can smooth your transition from student to certified counselor.

Best Scientists Citing Kathleen Rastle

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles