World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 89 1011 885 36 34 283 23852
Neuroscience 89 1173 1056 101 96 277 23779

Arthur M. Jacobs publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Arthur M. Jacobs between 1983 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Arthur M. Jacobs published across 43 years, from 1983 to 2025, averaging 7.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2013. 5 of the 305 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1983 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2013. 1983: 1 publication 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 5 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 15 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 22 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 22 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 1 publication
1983 2025

305 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Arthur M. Jacobs: publications per year, 1983 to 2025
Year Publications
1983 1
1984 1
1985 0
1986 2
1987 5
1988 0
1989 4
1990 0
1991 5
1992 5
1993 2
1994 5
1995 3
1996 3
1997 7
1998 7
1999 3
2000 4
2001 4
2002 5
2003 2
2004 4
2005 9
2006 11
2007 8
2008 15
2009 12
2010 2
2011 14
2012 15
2013 22
2014 17
2015 22
2016 17
2017 13
2018 16
2019 10
2020 7
2021 11
2022 5
2023 2
2024 4
2025 1
Total 305
Download as CSV

Arthur M. Jacobs publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arthur M. Jacobs sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 281–290 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 283 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139 283
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Arthur M. Jacobs D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arthur M. Jacobs sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 88–89 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 89 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83 89
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Arthur M. Jacobs is a researcher affiliated with Freie Universität Berlin in Germany. Their work primarily centers around psychology, neuroscience, and computer science, with notable contributions across these intersecting fields.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Computer Science

Within these areas, Jacobs has explored several subfields such as:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Social Psychology

Jacobs's research covers a range of topics, including:

  • Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Advanced Text Analysis Techniques
  • Multisensory Perception and Integration
  • Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Reading and Literacy Development

Their recent publications include:

  • Sentiment Analysis of Children and Youth Literature: Is There a Pollyanna Effect? (2020), published in Frontiers in Psychology
  • Following in Jakobson and Lévi-Strauss' footsteps: A neurocognitive poetics investigation of eye movements during the reading of Baudelaire's 'Les Chats' (2020), published in Journal of Eye Movement Research
  • Eye movements and mental imagery during reading of literary texts with different narrative styles (2020), published in Journal of Eye Movement Research
  • Neural processing of vision and language in kindergarten is associated with prereading skills and predicts future literacy (2021), published in Human Brain Mapping
  • From Abstract Symbols to Emotional (In-)Sights: An Eye Tracking Study on the Effects of Emotional Vignettes and Pictures (2020), published in Frontiers in Psychology

Jacobs has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Jana Lüdtke
  • Teresa Sylvester
  • Annette Kinder
  • Johanna Liebig
  • Gerhard Lauer

Their work has appeared in multiple academic venues, the most frequent being:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Journal of Eye Movement Research
  • Human Brain Mapping
  • Language and Literature International Journal of Stylistics

In book publications, Jacobs has published at least one title with Anthem Press eBooks entitled Neurocomputational Poetics in 2023.

Best Publications

  • Orthographic Processing in Visual Word Recognition: A Multiple Read-Out Model

    Jonathan Grainger;Arthur M. Jacobs

  • Coregistration of eye movements and EEG in natural reading: analyses and review.

    Olaf Dimigen;Werner Sommer;Annette Hohlfeld;Arthur M. Jacobs

  • The Berlin Affective Word List Reloaded (BAWL-R).

    Melissa L. H. Võ;Markus Conrad;Lars Kuchinke;Karolina Urton

  • The physiological origin of task-evoked systemic artefacts in functional near infrared spectroscopy

    Evgeniya Kirilina;Alexander Jelzow;Angela Heine;Michael Niessing

  • The Word Frequency Effect A Review of Recent Developments and Implications for the Choice of Frequency Estimates in German

    Marc Brysbaert;Matthias Buchmeier;Markus Conrad;Arthur M. Jacobs

  • On the role of competing word units in visual word recognition: the neighborhood frequency effect.

    Jonathan Grainger;J. Kevin O’regan;Arthur M. Jacobs;Juan Segui

  • Models of visual word recognition: Sampling the state of the art.

    Arthur M. Jacobs;Jonathan Grainger

  • Incidental effects of emotional valence in single word processing: an fMRI study.

    Lars Kuchinke;Arthur M. Jacobs;Claudia Grubich;Melissa L.-H. Võ

  • Optimal viewing position effect in word recognition: A challenge to current theory.

    J. K. O'Regan;Arthur M. Jacobs

  • What is the pronunciation for -ough and the spelling for /u/? A database for computing feedforward and feedback consistency in English

    Johannes C. Ziegler;Gregory O. Stone;Arthur M. Jacobs

  • Localist connectionist approaches to human cognition

    Jonathan Grainger;Arthur M. Jacobs

  • Eye movement control during reading: II. Frequency of refixating a word

    George W. McConkie;Paul W. Kerr;Michael D. Reddix;David Zola

  • Frequency and predictability effects on event-related potentials during reading

    Michael Dambacher;Reinhold Kliegl;Markus Hofmann;Arthur M. Jacobs

  • Neurocognitive poetics: methods and models for investigating the neuronal and cognitive-affective bases of literature reception.

    Arthur M. Jacobs

  • Looking at the brains behind figurative language--a quantitative meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies on metaphor, idiom, and irony processing.

    Isabel C. Bohrn;Ulrike Altmann;Arthur M. Jacobs

  • Statistical analysis of the bidirectional inconsistency of spelling and sound in French

    Johannes C. Ziegler;Arthur M. Jacobs;Gregory O. Stone

  • Identical Words are Read Differently in Different Languages

    Johannes C. Ziegler;Conrad Perry;Arthur M. Jacobs;Mario Braun

  • Affective processing within 1/10th of a second: High arousal is necessary for early facilitative processing of negative but not positive words

    Markus J. Hofmann;Lars Kuchinke;Sascha Tamm;Melissa L. H. Võ

  • OGAMA (Open Gaze and Mouse Analyzer): open-source software designed to analyze eye and mouse movements in slideshow study designs.

    Adrian Voßkühler;Volkhard Nordmeier;Lars Kuchinke;Arthur M. Jacobs

  • The coupling of emotion and cognition in the eye: introducing the pupil old/new effect.

    Melissa L.-H. Võ;Arthur M. Jacobs;Lars Kuchinke;Markus Hofmann

Frequent Co-Authors

Markus Conrad
Markus Conrad University of La Laguna
Lars Kuchinke
Lars Kuchinke International Psychoanalytic University Berlin
Johannes C. Ziegler
Johannes C. Ziegler Aix-Marseille University
Jonathan Grainger
Jonathan Grainger Aix-Marseille University
Hauke R. Heekeren
Hauke R. Heekeren Universität Hamburg
Malek Bajbouj
Malek Bajbouj Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Tatjana A. Nazir
Tatjana A. Nazir Claude Bernard University Lyon 1
Reinhold Kliegl
Reinhold Kliegl University of Potsdam
Stefan Koelsch
Stefan Koelsch University of Bergen
J. Kevin O'Regan
J. Kevin O'Regan Université Paris Cité

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree online opens doors to a range of flexible programs designed to fit different needs and lifestyles. Many U.S. universities now offer fully online options, making it easier to balance studies with work or family commitments. For those seeking convenience, there are easiest online psychology degree programs in Texas that feature supportive learning environments and accessible course structures.

Students living in the Midwest can consider the Wisconsin psychology programs online, renowned for their academic quality and flexibility. Meanwhile, those aiming to fast-track their education may be interested in accelerated online psychology degrees in Arizona, which allow completion in a shorter timeframe.

For undergraduates, accelerated online psychology bachelor's programs in Florida offer a rapid path to earning a degree and entering the workforce. These pathways can lead to various careers including counseling, social services, human resources, and further graduate studies. Online psychology programs are evolving to provide more accessible pathways to both academic advancement and a rewarding career in the mental health field.

Best Scientists Citing Arthur M. Jacobs

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles