World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 33 10525 9848 503 496 78 4839

Lars Kuchinke publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Lars Kuchinke between 2003 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Lars Kuchinke published across 24 years, from 2003 to 2026, averaging 4.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2017. 9 of the 114 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2017. 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 2 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 3 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 7 publications 2026: 2 publications
2003 2026

114 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Lars Kuchinke: publications per year, 2003 to 2026
Year Publications
2003 1
2004 1
2005 2
2006 1
2007 3
2008 2
2009 5
2010 0
2011 7
2012 3
2013 7
2014 7
2015 10
2016 4
2017 12
2018 3
2019 10
2020 5
2021 2
2022 4
2023 7
2024 9
2025 7
2026 2
Total 114
Download as CSV

Lars Kuchinke publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lars Kuchinke sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 71–80 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 78 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461 78
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Lars Kuchinke D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lars Kuchinke sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702 33
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Lars Kuchinke is affiliated with the International Psychoanalytic University Berlin in Germany. Their research spans multiple disciplines including psychology and medicine, with a significant focus on subfields such as public health, environmental and occupational health, clinical psychology, social psychology, automotive engineering, and geography, planning, and development.

The primary topics explored in their work include:

  • Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Infant Health and Development
  • Geographic Information Systems Studies
  • Breastfeeding Practices and Influences

Lars Kuchinke has contributed to various research publications, with notable papers including:

  • Effects of Visual Map Complexity on the Attentional Processing of Landmarks, 2020, PLoS ONE
  • Language Models Explain Word Reading Times Better Than Empirical Predictability, 2022, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
  • Structural Salience of Landmark Pictograms in Maps as a Predictor for Object Location Memory Performance, 2020, Journal of Environmental Psychology
  • Efficacy of Parent-Infant-Psychotherapy with Mothers with Postpartum Mental Disorder: Study Protocol of the Randomized Controlled Trial as Part of the SKKIPPI Project, 2020, Trials
  • Efficacy of Parent-Infant Psychotherapy Compared to Care as Usual in Children with Regulatory Disorders in Clinical and Outpatient Settings: Study Protocol of a Randomised Controlled Trial as Part of the SKKIPPI Project, 2021, BMC Psychiatry

The frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Journal of Environmental Psychology
  • Children
  • Research Square
  • PLoS ONE
  • Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence

Collaboration has been integral in their career, with key frequent co-authors including:

  • Anne Berghöfer
  • Christiane Ludwig-Körner
  • Stephanie Roll
  • Franziska Schlensog-Schuster
  • Thomas Reinhold

Best Publications

  • The Berlin Affective Word List Reloaded (BAWL-R).

    Melissa L. H. Võ;Markus Conrad;Lars Kuchinke;Karolina Urton

  • Incidental effects of emotional valence in single word processing: an fMRI study.

    Lars Kuchinke;Arthur M. Jacobs;Claudia Grubich;Melissa L.-H. Võ

  • Affective processing within 1/10th of a second: High arousal is necessary for early facilitative processing of negative but not positive words

    Markus J. Hofmann;Lars Kuchinke;Sascha Tamm;Melissa L. H. Võ

  • OGAMA (Open Gaze and Mouse Analyzer): open-source software designed to analyze eye and mouse movements in slideshow study designs.

    Adrian Voßkühler;Volkhard Nordmeier;Lars Kuchinke;Arthur M. Jacobs

  • The coupling of emotion and cognition in the eye: introducing the pupil old/new effect.

    Melissa L.-H. Võ;Arthur M. Jacobs;Lars Kuchinke;Markus Hofmann

  • Pupillary responses during lexical decisions vary with word frequency but not emotional valence

    Lars Kuchinke;Melissa L.-H. Võ;Markus Hofmann;Arthur M. Jacobs

  • Survey method matters: Online/offline questionnaires and face-to-face or telephone interviews differ

    Unknown

  • What our eyes tell us about feelings: Tracking pupillary responses during emotion regulation processes.

    Valerie L. Kinner;Lars Kuchinke;Angelika M. Dierolf;Christian J. Merz

  • Pupillary responses in art appreciation: Effects of aesthetic emotions

    Lars Kuchinke;Sabrina Trapp;Arthur M. Jacobs;Helmut Leder

  • Discrete emotion norms for nouns: Berlin affective word list (DENN–BAWL)

    Benny B. Briesemeister;Lars Kuchinke;Lars Kuchinke;Arthur M. Jacobs;Arthur M. Jacobs

  • Emotion word recognition: discrete information effects first, continuous later?

    Benny B. Briesemeister;Lars Kuchinke;Arthur M. Jacobs

  • Emotional Picture and Word Processing: An fMRI Study on Effects of Stimulus Complexity

    Lorna H. Schlochtermeier;Lars Kuchinke;Lars Kuchinke;Corinna Pehrs;Karolina Urton

  • The Temporal Pole Top-Down Modulates the Ventral Visual Stream During Social Cognition

    Corinna Pehrs;Jamil Zaki;Lorna H. Schlochtermeier;Arthur M. Jacobs

  • Discrete Emotion Effects on Lexical Decision Response Times

    Benny B. Briesemeister;Lars Kuchinke;Lars Kuchinke;Arthur M. Jacobs

  • 10 years of BAWLing into affective and aesthetic processes in reading: what are the echoes?

    Arthur M. Jacobs;Melissa L.-H. Võ;Benny B. Briesemeister;Markus Conrad

  • Differential activation of frontal and parietal regions during visual word recognition: an optical topography study.

    Markus J. Hofmann;Martin J. Herrmann;Ippeita Dan;Hellmuth Obrig

  • The Role of Orbitofrontal Cortex in Processing Empathy Stories in 4- to 8-Year-Old Children

    Tila Tabea Brink;Karolina Urton;Dada Held;Evgeniya Kirilina

  • Acquired affective associations induce emotion effects in word recognition: An ERP study

    Nathalie Fritsch;Lars Kuchinke

  • The pseudohomophone effect: evidence for an orthography-phonology-conflict

    Benny B. Briesemeister;Markus J. Hofmann;Sascha Tamm;Lars Kuchinke

  • Grids in Topographic Maps Reduce Distortions in the Recall of Learned Object Locations

    Dennis Edler;Anne-Kathrin Bestgen;Lars Kuchinke;Frank Dickmann

  • Remembering words in context as predicted by an associative read-out model

    Markus Josef Hofmann;Lars Kuchinke;Lars Kuchinke;Chris Biemann;Sascha Tamm

  • Lexical olfaction recruits olfactory orbitofrontal cortex in metaphorical and literal contexts.

    Jennifer Pomp;Jennifer Pomp;Anne-Kathrin Bestgen;Patrick Schulze;Christina J. Müller

  • Modulation of prefrontal cortex activation by emotional words in recognition memory

    Lars Kuchinke;Arthur M. Jacobs;Melissa L.-H. Vo;Markus Conrad

Frequent Co-Authors

Arthur M. Jacobs
Arthur M. Jacobs Freie Universität Berlin
Markus Conrad
Markus Conrad University of La Laguna
Stefan Koelsch
Stefan Koelsch University of Bergen
Manfred Herrmann
Manfred Herrmann University of Bremen
Boris Suchan
Boris Suchan Ruhr University Bochum
Andreas J. Fallgatter
Andreas J. Fallgatter University of Tübingen
Martin J. Herrmann
Martin J. Herrmann University of Würzburg
Reinhold Kliegl
Reinhold Kliegl University of Potsdam
Jamil Zaki
Jamil Zaki Stanford University
Lorenz Deserno
Lorenz Deserno University of Wurzburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees opens doors to a wide range of career pathways, including counseling, therapy, research, and clinical work. Many accredited universities in the USA now offer flexible online programs, allowing students to balance their studies with other commitments while preparing for state licensure and professional practice.

It’s important to choose a program recognized for its academic strength and industry connections. For example, some of the top-ranked counseling degree programs in California are known for their commitment to experiential learning and rigorous curriculum. Meanwhile, students interested in urban populations may find value in exploring popular counseling programs in Chicago, which often emphasize multicultural competence and practical field experiences.

Regional trends also play a role in shaping your study and career options. Look into popular counseling degrees in Colorado if you're drawn to integrative health approaches or outdoor therapy modalities. Those considering the Southeast may benefit from learning about the most popular counseling degree programs in Florida, which focus on a diverse client base and emerging specializations.

Best Scientists Citing Lars Kuchinke

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles