World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 64 2908 2669 1670 1499 133 24951

Jamil Zaki publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jamil Zaki between 2007 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jamil Zaki published across 19 years, from 2007 to 2025, averaging 8.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2015. 19 of the 166 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2007 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2015. 2007: 1 publication 2008: 3 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 16 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 9 publications
2007 2025

166 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jamil Zaki: publications per year, 2007 to 2025
Year Publications
2007 1
2008 3
2009 4
2010 4
2011 9
2012 5
2013 9
2014 6
2015 16
2016 13
2017 11
2018 14
2019 5
2020 11
2021 15
2022 11
2023 10
2024 10
2025 9
Total 166
Download as CSV

Jamil Zaki publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jamil Zaki sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 133 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644 133
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Jamil Zaki D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jamil Zaki sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 64–65 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290 64
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2013 - Hellman Fellow

Overview

Jamil Zaki is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States. Their research concentrates primarily in the fields of Psychology and Social Sciences, with a particular focus on subfields including Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Applied Psychology.

The main topics that characterize their work include:

  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Media Influence and Health

Key recent publications by Jamil Zaki include:

  • "Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response" (2020), published in Nature Human Behaviour
  • "Mental Health During the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Review and Recommendations for Moving Forward" (2022), published in Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • "Policy stringency and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal analysis of data from 15 countries" (2022), published in The Lancet Public Health
  • "Catastrophe Compassion: Understanding and Extending Prosociality Under Crisis" (2020), published in Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  • "A synthesis of evidence for policy from behavioural science during COVID-19" (2023), published in Nature

Jamil Zaki frequently publishes in several scientific venues, notably:

  • Nature Human Behaviour
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  • Emotion
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Their research collaborations involve frequent co-authors such as:

  • Desmond C. Ong
  • Robb Willer
  • Patricia Chen
  • Jay Joseph Van Bavel
  • Mina Cikara

An award received by Jamil Zaki includes the Hellman Fellow honor in 2013.

Best Publications

  • Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response.

    Jay J. Van Bavel;Katherine Baicker;Paulo S. Boggio;Valerio Capraro

  • Social effects of oxytocin in humans: context and person matter.

    Jennifer A. Bartz;Jamil Zaki;Niall Bolger;Kevin N. Ochsner

  • The neuroscience of empathy: progress, pitfalls and promise

    Jamil Zaki;Kevin N Ochsner

  • Interpersonal emotion regulation.

    Jamil Zaki;W. Craig Williams

  • Empathy: a motivated account.

    Jamil Zaki

  • Building long-term empathy: A large-scale comparison of traditional and virtual reality perspective-taking.

    Fernanda Herrera;Jeremy Bailenson;Erika Weisz;Elise Ogle

  • It Takes Two The Interpersonal Nature of Empathic Accuracy

    Jamil Zaki;Niall Bolger;Kevin Ochsner

  • Overlapping activity in anterior insula during interoception and emotional experience

    Jamil Zaki;Joshua Ian Davis;Kevin N. Ochsner

  • Oxytocin Selectively Improves Empathic Accuracy

    Jennifer A. Bartz;Jamil Zaki;Niall Bolger;Eric Hollander

  • The neural bases of empathic accuracy.

    Jamil Zaki;Jochen Weber;Niall Bolger;Kevin Ochsner

  • The Emerging Study of Positive Empathy

    Sylvia A. Morelli;Matthew D. Lieberman;Jamil Zaki

  • Social Influence Modulates the Neural Computation of Value

    Jamil Zaki;Jessica Schirmer;Jason P. Mitchell

  • Mental health during the First Year of the COVID-19 pandemic: a review and recommendations for moving forward

    L Aknin;J-E De Neve;E Dunn;D Fancourt

  • Interpersonal emotion regulation: Implications for affiliation, perceived support, relationships, and well-being.

    W. Craig Williams;Sylvia A. Morelli;Desmond C. Ong;Jamil Zaki

  • Emotional and instrumental support provision interact to predict well-being.

    Sylvia A. Morelli;Ihno A. Lee;Molly E. Arnn;Jamil Zaki

  • Policy stringency and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal analysis of data from 15 countries

    Unknown

  • Intuitive Prosociality

    Unknown

  • Effects of oxytocin on recollections of maternal care and closeness

    Jennifer A. Bartz;Jamil Zaki;Kevin N. Ochsner;Niall Bolger

  • Addressing the empathy deficit: Beliefs about the malleability of empathy predict effortful responses when empathy is challenging.

    Karina Schumann;Jamil Zaki;Carol S. Dweck

  • The Need for a Cognitive Neuroscience of Naturalistic Social Cognition

    Jamil Zaki;Kevin Ochsner

  • The anatomy of suffering: Understanding the relationship between nociceptive and empathic pain

    Jamil Zaki;Tor D. Wager;Tania Singer;Christian Keysers;Christian Keysers

  • Different circuits for different pain: Patterns of functional connectivity reveal distinct networks for processing pain in self and others

    Jamil Zaki;Kevin N. Ochsner;Josh Hanelin;Tor D. Wager

Frequent Co-Authors

Kevin N. Ochsner
Kevin N. Ochsner Columbia University
Noah D. Goodman
Noah D. Goodman Stanford University
Niall Bolger
Niall Bolger Columbia University
Jason P. Mitchell
Jason P. Mitchell Harvard University
Robb Willer
Robb Willer Stanford University
June Gruber
June Gruber University of Colorado Boulder
Jeremy N. Bailenson
Jeremy N. Bailenson Stanford University
Aleksandra Cichocka
Aleksandra Cichocka University of Kent
M. Mercedes Perez-Rodriguez
M. Mercedes Perez-Rodriguez Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Carol S. Dweck
Carol S. Dweck Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As interest in psychology grows, online degrees are making this field more accessible than ever. Studying psychology online offers flexibility, letting you balance your education with personal and professional obligations. However, it’s important to carefully compare programs to find the best fit in terms of quality, reputation, and student support.

Program rankings can be a helpful resource when making your decision. You can consult the best online psychology bachelor’s degree rankings in Cincinnati to understand regional opportunities in Ohio. If you’re considering Illinois, explore the best online psychology bachelor’s program rankings in Illinois for program comparisons in that state. Students in New York can benefit from checking the best online psychology bachelor’s degree rankings in New York, while those in Pennsylvania might use the best online psychology bachelor’s program rankings in Pennsylvania.

Earning an online degree in psychology can lead to roles in counseling, social services, research, and human resources. Some career paths may require advanced degrees or licensure, so it’s wise to review your target state's requirements and consider future graduate study opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Jamil Zaki

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles