World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 33 2450 2311 146 146 87 6271

Paul Harrigan publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Paul Harrigan between 2007 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Paul Harrigan published across 19 years, from 2007 to 2025, averaging 5.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2011. 5 of the 101 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2007 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2011. 2007: 2 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 5 publications
2007 2025

101 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Paul Harrigan: publications per year, 2007 to 2025
Year Publications
2007 2
2008 3
2009 3
2010 2
2011 12
2012 5
2013 5
2014 5
2015 6
2016 5
2017 6
2018 6
2019 7
2020 8
2021 12
2022 3
2023 6
2024 0
2025 5
Total 101
Download as CSV

Paul Harrigan publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Harrigan sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 85–89 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 87 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94 87
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

Paul Harrigan D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Harrigan sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161 33
34 135
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Paul Harrigan is affiliated with the University of Western Australia in Australia and conducts research in the fields of Social Sciences and Business, Management and Accounting. Their work spans several subfields including Sociology and Political Science, Marketing, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Communication, and Human-Computer Interaction.

The main topics of Paul Harrigan's research focus on Digital Marketing and Social Media, Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification, Digital Communication and Language, Customer Service Quality and Loyalty, Impact of Technology on Adolescents, Technology Adoption and User Behaviour, and Service and Product Innovation.

Paul Harrigan has published multiple recent papers, including:

  • Identifying influencers on social media, 2020, International Journal of Information Management
  • The role of social media in the engagement and information processes of social CRM, 2020, International Journal of Information Management

Other highly cited recent papers related to their sphere but primarily authored by other researchers include:

  • Influencer Endorsements: How Advertising Disclosure and Source Credibility Affect Consumer Purchase Intention on Social Media, 2020, Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ)
  • Marketing research on Mobile apps: past, present and future, 2021, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science
  • How trust leads to online purchase intention founded in perceived usefulness and peer communication, 2021, Journal of Consumer Behaviour

Frequent co-authors of Paul Harrigan include Kristof Coussement, Sanjit Kumar Roy, Jason Weismueller, Shasha Wang, and Kim Feddema, reflecting collaborative research efforts across multiple projects.

Paul Harrigan's research frequently appears in several publication venues, notably:

  • Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ)
  • Journal of Business Research
  • International Journal of Information Management
  • Journal of Marketing Management
  • Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science

Best Publications

  • Customer engagement with tourism social media brands

    Paul Harrigan;Uwana Evers;Morgan Miles;Timothy Daly

  • Customer engagement and the relationship between involvement, engagement, self-brand connection and brand usage intent

    Paul Harrigan;Uwana Evers;Morgan P. Miles;Tim Daly

  • CRM to social CRM: the integration of new technologies into customer relationship management

    Musfiq Mannan Choudhury;Paul Harrigan

  • Modelling CRM in a social media age

    Paul Harrigan;Geoff Soutar;Musfiq Mannan Choudhury;Michelle Lowe

  • Marketing research on Mobile apps: past, present and future.

    Lara Stocchi;Naser Pourazad;Nina Michaelidou;Arry Tanusondjaja

  • Identifying influencers on social media

    Paul Harrigan;Timothy M. Daly;Kristof Coussement;Kristof Coussement;Julie A. Lee

  • Critical Factors Underpinning the e-CRM Activities of SMEs”.

    Paul Harrigan;Elaine Ramsey;Patrick Ibbotson

  • Exploring entrepreneurial marketing

    Morgan Miles;Audrey Gilmore;Paul Harrigan;Gemma Lewis

  • From e-CRM to s-CRM. Critical factors underpinning the social CRM activities of SMEs

    Paul Harrigan;Morgan P Miles

  • How Can Marketing Academics Serve Marketing Practice? The New Marketing DNA as a Model for Marketing Education.

    Paul Harrigan;Bev Hulbert

  • Linking social media to customer relationship management (CRM): a qualitative study on SMEs

    Sushmita Guha;Paul Harrigan;Geoff Soutar

  • How trust leads to online purchase intention founded in perceived usefulness and peer communication

    Maggie Harrigan;Kim Feddema;Shasha Wang;Paul Harrigan;Paul Harrigan

  • CAPTURING AND CO-CREATING STUDENT EXPERIENCES IN SOCIAL MEDIA: A SOCIAL IDENTITY THEORY PERSPECTIVE

    Momoko Fujita;Paul Harrigan;Geoffrey N. Soutar

  • Tackling social media data analysis: Comparing and contrasting QSR NVivo and Leximancer

    Violetta Wilk;Geoffrey N. Soutar;Paul Harrigan

  • The rise of smart consumers: role of smart servicescape and smart consumer experience co-creation

    Sanjit K. Roy;Gaganpreet Singh;Megan Hope;Bang Nguyen

  • Exploring and explaining SME marketing: investigating e-CRM using a mixed methods approach

    Paul Harrigan;Elaine Ramsey;Patrick Ibbotson

  • Online brand advocacy (OBA): The development of a multiple item scale

    Violetta Wilk;Geoffrey Norman Soutar;Paul Harrigan

  • Investigating the e‐CRM activities of Irish SMEs

    Paul Harrigan;Elaine Ramsey;Patrick Ibbotson

  • e-CRM in SMEs: an exploratory study in Northern Ireland

    Paul Harrigan;Elaine Ramsey;Patrick Ibbotson

  • Social Media in Politics: The Ultimate Voter Engagement Tool or Simply an Echo Chamber?

    Lisa Harris;Paul Harrigan

Frequent Co-Authors

Geoffrey N. Soutar
Geoffrey N. Soutar University of Western Australia
Morgan P. Miles
Morgan P. Miles Charles Sturt University
Kristof Coussement
Kristof Coussement IESEG School of Management
Yulin Fang
Yulin Fang University of Hong Kong
Simone Pettigrew
Simone Pettigrew George Institute for Global Health
Bang Nguyen
Bang Nguyen Oxford Brookes University
K. A. I. Nekaris
K. A. I. Nekaris Oxford Brookes University
Vincent Nijman
Vincent Nijman Oxford Brookes University
Nina Michaelidou
Nina Michaelidou Loughborough University
Audrey Gilmore
Audrey Gilmore University of Ulster

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in Business and Management can open diverse and rewarding pathways. Today, online learning makes it easier to gain valuable qualifications, no matter your schedule. For those seeking to fast-track their education, accelerated degrees offer the opportunity to finish programs faster and enter the workforce sooner.

Affordability is a top concern for many learners. Finding the online college business degree that fits your budget can help minimize debt as you build skills employers want. Many programs offer flexible formats and specializations to suit your career goals.

Healthcare administration is a growing field combining business principles with healthcare knowledge. Prospective students interested in this area should explore the healthcare administration degree options available online. Those looking to move into leadership roles might consider pursuing the healthcare administration degree at the master's level for greater advancement opportunities.

Whether you choose business management or healthcare administration, online degrees provide convenient, affordable, and flexible pathways to a rewarding career.

Best Scientists Citing Paul Harrigan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles