World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jeremy N. Bailenson

Jeremy N. Bailenson

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
90
Citations
35226
World Ranking
945
National Ranking
597

Jeremy N. Bailenson publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeremy N. Bailenson sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 238 publications — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Jeremy N. Bailenson D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeremy N. Bailenson sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 90 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jeremy N. Bailenson is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Computer Science and Psychology, with significant contributions in subfields such as Human-Computer Interaction, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Literature and Literary Theory.

The main topics covered by Bailenson's work include Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts, Media Influence and Health, Action Observation and Synchronization, Impact of Technology on Adolescents, Environmental Education and Sustainability, Climate Change Communication and Perception, and Team Dynamics and Performance.

Some of the recent papers published by Bailenson include:

  • Nonverbal overload: A theoretical argument for the causes of Zoom fatigue., 2021, Technology Mind and Behavior
  • Zoom Exhaustion & Fatigue Scale, 2021, Computers in Human Behavior Reports
  • Nonverbal Mechanisms Predict Zoom Fatigue and Explain Why Women Experience Higher Levels than Men, 2021, SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Personal identifiability of user tracking data during observation of 360-degree VR video, 2020, Scientific Reports
  • The Rocketbox Library and the Utility of Freely Available Rigged Avatars, 2020, Frontiers in Virtual Reality

Bailenson has frequently published in venues such as Technology Mind and Behavior, Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking, SSRN Electronic Journal, Scientific Reports, and Computers in Human Behavior.

The scientist has collaborated repeatedly with co-authors that include Anna Carolina Muller Queiroz, Eugy Han, Géraldine Fauville, Jeffrey T. Hancock, and Cyan DeVeaux.

Best Publications

  • The Proteus Effect: The Effect of Transformed Self-Representation on Behavior

    Nick Yee;Jeremy Bailenson

  • How Immersive Is Enough? A Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Immersive Technology on User Presence

    James J. Cummings;Jeremy N. Bailenson

  • Immersive Virtual Environment Technology as a Methodological Tool for Social Psychology

    Jim Blascovich;Jack Loomis;Andrew C. Beall;Kimberly R. Swinth

  • The Proteus Effect Implications of Transformed Digital Self-Representation on Online and Offline Behavior

    Nick Yee;Jeremy N. Bailenson;Nicolas Ducheneaut

  • Nonverbal overload: A theoretical argument for the causes of Zoom fatigue

    Jeremy N. Bailenson

  • Interpersonal Distance in Immersive Virtual Environments

    Jeremy N. Bailenson;Jim Blascovich;Andrew C. Beall;Jack M. Loomis

  • The unbearable likeness of being digital: the persistence of nonverbal social norms in online virtual environments.

    Nick Yee;Jeremy N. Bailenson;Mark Urbanek;Francis Chang

  • A Systematic Review of Social Presence: Definition, Antecedents, and Implications.

    Catherine S. Oh;Jeremy N. Bailenson;Gregory F. Welch

  • INCREASING SAVING BEHAVIOR THROUGH AGE-PROGRESSED RENDERINGS OF THE FUTURE SELF.

    Hal E . Hershfield;Daniel G . Goldstein;William F . Sharpe;Jesse Fox

  • Digital Chameleons Automatic Assimilation of Nonverbal Gestures in Immersive Virtual Environments

    Jeremy N. Bailenson;Nick Yee

  • The Use of Immersive Virtual Reality in the Learning Sciences: Digital Transformations of Teachers, Students, and Social Context

    Jeremy N. Bailenson;Nick Yee;Jim Blascovich;Andrew C. Beall

  • Equilibrium Theory Revisited: Mutual Gaze and Personal Space in Virtual Environments

    Jeremy N. Bailenson;Jim Blascovich;Andrew C. Beall;Jack M. Loomis

  • Building long-term empathy: A large-scale comparison of traditional and virtual reality perspective-taking.

    Fernanda Herrera;Jeremy Bailenson;Erika Weisz;Elise Ogle

  • Virtual Self-Modeling: The Effects of Vicarious Reinforcement and Identification on Exercise Behaviors

    Jesse Fox;Jeremy N. Bailenson

  • Infinite Reality: Avatars, Eternal Life, New Worlds, and the Dawn of the Virtual Revolution

    Jim Blascovich;Jeremy Bailenson

  • Virtual Reality: A Survival Guide for the Social Scientist

    Jesse Fox;Dylan Arena;Jeremy N. Bailenson

  • The Effect of Behavioral Realism and Form Realism of Real-Time Avatar Faces on Verbal Disclosure, Nonverbal Disclosure, Emotion Recognition, and Copresence in Dyadic Interaction

    Jeremy N. Bailenson;Nick Yee;Dan Merget;Ralph Schroeder

  • Immersive Virtual Reality Field Trips Facilitate Learning About Climate Change.

    David M. Markowitz;Rob Laha;Brian P. Perone;Roy D. Pea

  • Experiencing Nature: Embodying Animals in Immersive Virtual Environments Increases Inclusion of Nature in Self and Involvement With Nature

    Sun Joo Grace Ahn;Joshua Bostick;Elise Ogle;Kristine L. Nowak

  • The independent and interactive effects of embodied-agent appearance and behavior on self-report, cognitive, and behavioral markers of copresence in immersive virtual environments

    Jeremy N. Bailenson;Kim Swinth;Crystal Hoyt;Susan Persky

  • Virtual Superheroes: Using Superpowers in Virtual Reality to Encourage Prosocial Behavior

    Robin S. Rosenberg;Shawnee L. Baughman;Jeremy N. Bailenson

  • Implications of Transformed Digital Self-Representation on Online and Offline Behavior

    Nick Yee;Jeremy N. Bailenson;Nicolas Ducheneaut

Frequent Co-Authors

Jim Blascovich
Jim Blascovich University of California, Santa Barbara
Nick Yee
Nick Yee Palo Alto Research Center
Andrew C. Beall
Andrew C. Beall University of California, Santa Barbara
Jesse Fox
Jesse Fox The Ohio State University
Jeffrey T. Hancock
Jeffrey T. Hancock Stanford University
Greg Welch
Greg Welch University of Central Florida
Jack M. Loomis
Jack M. Loomis University of California, Santa Barbara
Gerd Bruder
Gerd Bruder University of Central Florida
Clifford Nass
Clifford Nass Stanford University
Rosanna E. Guadagno
Rosanna E. Guadagno Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology programs opens doors to a range of professional opportunities. Earning a graduate certificate psychology can give you foundational skills and specialized knowledge in less time than a full degree. This can be a great option for professionals looking to expand expertise or pivot into psychology-related roles.

For those interested in the intersection of psychology and business, several online masters program organizational psychology options prepare graduates to improve workplace culture and productivity. If you’re looking for programs that meet high professional standards, consider apa accredited industrial organizational psychology programs to ensure rigorous academic and ethical training.

Those fascinated by law and criminal justice might pursue the best online forensic psychology master's programs, leading to careers in courts, corrections, or law enforcement agencies. Whether you want to advance your current career or change directions, these online psychology degree pathways offer flexibility and specialization to suit a variety of interests and goals.

Best Scientists Citing Jeremy N. Bailenson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles