World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
71
Citations
21004
World Ranking
2151
National Ranking
1256

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
67
Citations
20181
World Ranking
1279
National Ranking
418

Jack M. Loomis publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jack M. Loomis sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 145 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Jack M. Loomis D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jack M. Loomis sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jack M. Loomis is affiliated with the University of California, Santa Barbara in the United States. Their research spans multiple interdisciplinary fields, emphasizing the integration of engineering, neuroscience, and computer science.

The main fields of study associated with their work include:

  • Engineering
  • Neuroscience
  • Computer Science

Within these broad areas, Loomis has contributed to several specialized subfields, such as:

  • Automotive Engineering
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Their research topics focus on spatial cognition, sensory interactions, and emerging technology applications. Specifically, the primary topics covered include:

  • Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Augmented Reality Applications

Jack M. Loomis has collaborated with other researchers, often co-authoring works with the following individuals:

  • Reginald G. Golledge
  • Roberta L. Klatzky
  • James R. Marston

Best Publications

  • Immersive Virtual Environment Technology as a Methodological Tool for Social Psychology

    Jim Blascovich;Jack Loomis;Andrew C. Beall;Kimberly R. Swinth

  • Interpersonal Distance in Immersive Virtual Environments

    Jeremy N. Bailenson;Jim Blascovich;Andrew C. Beall;Jack M. Loomis

  • Immersive virtual environment technology as a basic research tool in psychology.

    Jack M. Loomis;James J. Blascovich;Andrew C. Beall

  • Visual space perception and visually directed action.

    Jack M. Loomis;J. A. Da Silva;N. Fujita;S. S. Fukusima

  • Nonvisual navigation by blind and sighted: assessment of path integration ability

    Jack M. Loomis;Roberta L. Klatzky;Reginald G. Golledge;Joseph G. Cicinelli

  • Equilibrium Theory Revisited: Mutual Gaze and Personal Space in Virtual Environments

    Jeremy N. Bailenson;Jim Blascovich;Andrew C. Beall;Jack M. Loomis

  • Visual perception of egocentric distance in real and virtual environments.

    Jack Loomis;Joshua Knapp

  • Spatial Updating of Self-Position and Orientation During Real, Imagined, and Virtual Locomotion

    Roberta L. Klatzky;Jack M. Loomis;Andrew C. Beall;Sarah S. Chance

  • Locomotion Mode Affects the Updating of Objects Encountered During Travel: The Contribution of Vestibular and Proprioceptive Inputs to Path Integration

    Sarah S. Chance;Florence Gaunet;Andrew C. Beall;Jack M. Loomis

  • Does the quality of the computer graphics matter when judging distances in visually immersive environments

    William B. Thompson;Peter Willemsen;Amy A. Gooch;Sarah H. Creem-Regehr

  • Distal attribution and presence

    Jack M. Loomis

  • Navigation System for the Blind: Auditory Display Modes and Guidance

    Jack M. Loomis;Reginald G. Golledge;Roberta L. Klatzky

  • Optical velocity patterns, velocity-sensitive neurons, and space perception: a hypothesis.

    K Nakayama;J M Loomis

  • Transformed Social Interaction: Decoupling Representation from Behavior and Form in Collaborative Virtual Environments

    Jeremy N. Bailenson;Andrew C. Beall;Jack Loomis;Jim Blascovich

  • Comparison of two indicators of perceived egocentric distance under full-cue and reduced-cue conditions

    John W. Philbeck;Jack M. Loomis

  • Limited field of view of head-mounted displays is not the cause of distance underestimation in virtual environments

    Joshua M. Knapp;Jack M. Loomis

  • Similarity of tactual and visual picture recognition with limited field of view

    Jack M Loomis;Roberta L Klatzky;Susan J Lederman

  • Visual Perception of Location and Distance

    Jack M. Loomis;José A. Da Silva;John W. Philbeck;Sergio S. Fukusima

  • Acquisition of Route and Survey Knowledge in the Absence of Vision

    Roberta L. Klatzky;Jack M. Loomis;Reginald G. Golledge;Joseph G. Cicinelli

  • Haptic identification of objects and their depictions

    Roberta L. Klatzky;Jack M. Loomis;Susan J. Lederman;Hiromi Wake

  • Personal guidance system for the visually impaired

    J. M. Loomis;R. G. Golledge;R. L. Klatzky;J. M. Speigle

Frequent Co-Authors

Roberta L. Klatzky
Roberta L. Klatzky Carnegie Mellon University
Reginald G. Golledge
Reginald G. Golledge University of California, Santa Barbara
Andrew C. Beall
Andrew C. Beall University of California, Santa Barbara
Jeremy N. Bailenson
Jeremy N. Bailenson Stanford University
Jim Blascovich
Jim Blascovich University of California, Santa Barbara
Heinrich H. Bülthoff
Heinrich H. Bülthoff Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics
Betty J. Mohler
Betty J. Mohler Amazon (United States)
Roy S. Smith
Roy S. Smith ETH Zurich
Susan J. Lederman
Susan J. Lederman Queen's University
Thomas Wolbers
Thomas Wolbers German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Engineering and Technology opens doors to a wide range of career possibilities, especially when complemented by related online degrees. If you’re interested in leadership roles within technical environments, consider the cheapest online master's in organizational leadership. This degree helps develop management and organizational skills, valuable for engineers moving into supervisory positions.

For those seeking to specialize in operations, online mba programs in operations management combine technical expertise with business strategy, preparing graduates for high-demand roles in logistics, manufacturing, and supply chain management.

Flexibility is key for busy professionals; many accredited institutions offer online mba no gmat programs, removing traditional standardized testing barriers and making it easier to further your studies while working.

Budget-conscious students can also find opportunities through an online mba under 25k, making career advancements accessible without significant financial strain. By combining technical studies with these flexible, affordable pathways, engineering graduates can broaden their career prospects and enhance their leadership potential.

Best Scientists Citing Jack M. Loomis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles