World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
32
Citations
9647
World Ranking
12866
National Ranking
5188

Andrew C. Beall publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew C. Beall sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 61 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Andrew C. Beall D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew C. Beall sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Andrew C. Beall is affiliated with the University of California, Santa Barbara in the United States. The academic profile reflects a focus on research activities conducted within this institution.

No specific publications, recent papers, or detailed records of co-authors are currently documented for this researcher. Similarly, there are no listed publications in particular venues or book publications associated with this scientist.

The fields and subfields of study relevant to this researcher have not been detailed, nor are there any highlighted main topics of work that define their research scope.

There are no recorded awards or honors attributed to this individual at this time.

Available information provides a foundation mainly anchored in the institutional affiliation without further disclosures regarding research output, collaborations, or specific scientific contributions.

Best Publications

  • Immersive Virtual Environment Technology as a Methodological Tool for Social Psychology

    Jim Blascovich;Jack Loomis;Andrew C. Beall;Kimberly R. Swinth

  • Interpersonal Distance in Immersive Virtual Environments

    Jeremy N. Bailenson;Jim Blascovich;Andrew C. Beall;Jack M. Loomis

  • Immersive virtual environment technology as a basic research tool in psychology.

    Jack M. Loomis;James J. Blascovich;Andrew C. Beall

  • The Use of Immersive Virtual Reality in the Learning Sciences: Digital Transformations of Teachers, Students, and Social Context

    Jeremy N. Bailenson;Nick Yee;Jim Blascovich;Andrew C. Beall

  • Equilibrium Theory Revisited: Mutual Gaze and Personal Space in Virtual Environments

    Jeremy N. Bailenson;Jim Blascovich;Andrew C. Beall;Jack M. Loomis

  • Spatial Updating of Self-Position and Orientation During Real, Imagined, and Virtual Locomotion

    Roberta L. Klatzky;Jack M. Loomis;Andrew C. Beall;Sarah S. Chance

  • Locomotion Mode Affects the Updating of Objects Encountered During Travel: The Contribution of Vestibular and Proprioceptive Inputs to Path Integration

    Sarah S. Chance;Florence Gaunet;Andrew C. Beall;Jack M. Loomis

  • Does the quality of the computer graphics matter when judging distances in visually immersive environments

    William B. Thompson;Peter Willemsen;Amy A. Gooch;Sarah H. Creem-Regehr

  • Transformed Social Interaction: Decoupling Representation from Behavior and Form in Collaborative Virtual Environments

    Jeremy N. Bailenson;Andrew C. Beall;Jack Loomis;Jim Blascovich

  • Transformed social interaction, augmented gaze, and social influence in immersive virtual environments

    Jeremy N. Bailenson;Andrew C. Beall;Jack Loomis;J. I. M. Blascovich

  • Visually perceived location is an invariant in the control of action.

    John W. Philbeck;Jack M. Loomis;Andrew C. Beall

  • Gaze and task performance in shared virtual environments

    Jeremy N. Bailenson;Andrew C. Beall;Jim Blascovich

  • Detecting digital chameleons

    Jeremy N. Bailenson;Nick Yee;Kayur Patel;Andrew C. Beall

  • Comparing Behavioral and Self-Report Measures of Embodied Agents' Social Presence in Immersive Virtual Environments

    Jeremy N. Bailenson;Rosanna E. Guadagno;Eyal Aharoni;Aleksandar Dimov

  • Transformed Social Interaction: Exploring the Digital Plasticity of Avatars

    Jeremy N. Bailenson;Andrew C. Beall

  • Place learning in humans: The role of distance and direction information

    David Waller;Jack M. Loomis;Reginald G. Golledge;Andrew C. Beall

  • Intelligent Agents Who Wear Your Face: Users' Reactions to the Virtual Self

    Jeremy N. Bailenson;Andrew C. Beall;Jim Blascovich;Mike Raimundo

  • Courtroom Applications of Virtual Environments, Immersive Virtual Environments, and Collaborative Virtual Environments.

    Jeremy Bailenson;Jim Blascovich;Andrew Beall;Beth Simone Noveck

  • Visually Controlled Locomotion: Its Dependence on Optic Flow, Three-Dimensional Space Perception, and Cognition

    Jack M. Loomis;Andrew C. Beall

  • Visual Control of Steering without Course Information

    Andrew C Beall;Jack M Loomis

  • Psychophysics of Perceiving Eye-Gaze and Head Direction with Peripheral Vision: Implications for the Dynamics of Eye-Gaze Behavior

    Jack M Loomis;Jonathan W Kelly;Matthias Pusch;Jeremy N Bailenson

  • Using virtual environments to assess directional knowledge

    David Waller;Andrew C Beall;Jack M Loomis

  • Human navigation ability: Tests of the encoding-errormodel of path integration

    Roberta L. Klatzky;Andrew C. Beall;Jack M. Loomis;Reginald G. Golledge

Frequent Co-Authors

Jack M. Loomis
Jack M. Loomis University of California, Santa Barbara
Jeremy N. Bailenson
Jeremy N. Bailenson Stanford University
Jim Blascovich
Jim Blascovich University of California, Santa Barbara
Matthew Turk
Matthew Turk Toyota Technological Institute at Chicago
Roy S. Smith
Roy S. Smith ETH Zurich
Rosanna E. Guadagno
Rosanna E. Guadagno Stanford University
Reginald G. Golledge
Reginald G. Golledge University of California, Santa Barbara
Michael Jenkin
Michael Jenkin York University
Crystal L. Hoyt
Crystal L. Hoyt University of Richmond
Laurence R. Harris
Laurence R. Harris York University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens doors to several flexible online degree options. These pathways cater to both those seeking to enter the tech field and professionals aiming to advance their careers. Online associate’s degree programs offer a quick and affordable introduction to the basics of computing, perfect for students beginning their academic journey. You can discover more about an online associate's degree in computer science to start building foundational skills.

If you already hold a bachelor’s degree, leveling up with a master’s is a smart move. Wondering what masters program should I do? Focus on high-demand areas like data science, cybersecurity, and software engineering, all commonly available in online formats. For those seeking speed, consider the shortest online masters degree options that allow you to earn a respected credential in less time.

Cost is a major factor, but there are cheap online degrees fast available from reputable institutions. With so many affordable and accelerated programs, getting started on your dream IT career path has never been easier.

Best Scientists Citing Andrew C. Beall

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles