World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
65
Citations
13461
World Ranking
3148
National Ranking
271

Klaus Jahn publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Klaus Jahn sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 332 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Klaus Jahn D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Klaus Jahn sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Klaus Jahn is affiliated with Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on medicine and neuroscience, with a particular emphasis on neurology and rehabilitation disciplines.

The main fields of study in their work include:

  • Medicine
  • Neuroscience

Within these broader areas, their subfields of study cover:

  • Neurology
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Psychiatry and Mental Health
  • Rehabilitation
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Klaus Jahn's research addresses several topics, especially in neurological and vestibular disorders. Key topics of their work include:

  • Vestibular and auditory disorders
  • Balance, gait, and falls prevention
  • Cerebral palsy and movement disorders
  • Stroke rehabilitation and recovery
  • Intensive care unit cognitive disorders
  • Hearing, cochlea, tinnitus, genetics
  • Ophthalmology and eye disorders

Their frequent co-authors demonstrate collaboration within the field and include:

  • Max Wuehr
  • Carmen Krewer
  • Jeannine Bergmann
  • Friedemann Müller
  • Andreas Zwergal

They have published extensively in several venues, notably:

  • Journal of Neurology
  • Frontiers in Neurology
  • Scientific Reports
  • Journal of Vestibular Research
  • Clinical Neurophysiology

Recent significant papers authored or co-authored by Klaus Jahn include:

  • Acute unilateral vestibulopathy/vestibular neuritis: Diagnostic criteria, 2022, Journal of Vestibular Research
  • Vestibular migraine and recurrent vertigo of childhood: Diagnostic criteria consensus document of the Classification Committee of Vestibular Disorders of the Bárány Society and the International Headache Society, 2020, Journal of Vestibular Research
  • Vestibular rehabilitation in Europe: a survey of clinical and research practice, 2020, Journal of Neurology
  • Quality of life up to 10 years after traumatic brain injury: a cross-sectional analysis, 2020, Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
  • Fall prediction in neurological gait disorders: differential contributions from clinical assessment, gait analysis, and daily-life mobility monitoring, 2021, Journal of Neurology

Best Publications

  • Methylprednisolone, Valacyclovir, or the Combination for Vestibular Neuritis

    Michael Strupp;Vera Carina Zingler;Viktor Arbusow;Daniel Niklas

  • Real versus imagined locomotion: a [18F]-FDG PET-fMRI comparison.

    Christian la Fougère;Andreas Zwergal;Axel Rominger;Stefan Förster

  • Brain activation patterns during imagined stance and locomotion in functional magnetic resonance imaging.

    Klaus Jahn;Angela Deutschländer;Thomas Stephan;Michael Strupp

  • Causative factors and epidemiology of bilateral vestibulopathy in 255 patients.

    Vera C. Zingler;Christian Cnyrim;Klaus Jahn;Eva Weintz

  • Imaging human supraspinal locomotor centers in brainstem and cerebellum.

    Klaus Jahn;Angela Deutschländer;Thomas Stephan;Roger Kalla

  • Psychiatric comorbidity and psychosocial impairment among patients with vertigo and dizziness

    Claas Lahmann;Peter Henningsen;Thomas Brandt;Michael Strupp

  • Treatment of downbeat nystagmus with 3,4-diaminopyridine A placebo-controlled study

    M. Strupp;O. Schüler;S. Krafczyk;K. Jahn

  • Aging of human supraspinal locomotor and postural control in fMRI.

    Andreas Zwergal;Jennifer Linn;Guoming Xiong;Thomas Brandt

  • Gait Disturbances in Old Age: Classification, Diagnosis, and Treatment From a Neurological Perspective

    Klaus Jahn;Andreas Zwergal;Roman Schniepp

  • A randomized trial of 4-aminopyridine in EA2 and related familial episodic ataxias

    M. Strupp;R. Kalla;J. Claassen;Christine Adrion

  • Locomotion speed determines gait variability in cerebellar ataxia and vestibular failure.

    Roman Schniepp;Maximilian Wuehr;Maximilian Neuhaeusser;Maria Kamenova

  • Beyond Dizziness: Virtual Navigation, Spatial Anxiety and Hippocampal Volume in Bilateral Vestibulopathy.

    Olympia Kremmyda;Katharina Hüfner;Virginia L. Flanagin;Derek A. Hamilton

  • Health services utilization of patients with vertigo in primary care: a retrospective cohort study

    Eva Grill;Michael Strupp;Martin Müller;Klaus Jahn

  • Structural and Functional Plasticity of the Hippocampal Formation in Professional Dancers and Slackliners

    Katharina Hüfner;Carolina Binetti;Derek A. Hamilton;Thomas Stephan

  • Supraspinal locomotor control in quadrupeds and humans.

    Klaus Jahn;Angela Deutschländer;Thomas Stephan;Roger Kalla

  • Follow-up of vestibular function in bilateral vestibulopathy

    Vera C Zingler;Eva Weintz;Klaus Jahn;Andrea Mike

  • Falls and fear of falling in vertigo and balance disorders: A controlled cross-sectional study.

    Cornelia Schlick;Roman Schniepp;Verena Loidl;Max Wuehr

  • Differential effects of vestibular stimulation on walking and running.

    Klaus Jahn;Michael Strupp;Erich Schneider;Marianne Dieterich

  • How the eyes move the body

    S. Glasauer;E. Schneider;K. Jahn;M. Strupp

  • Increased gait variability is associated with the history of falls in patients with cerebellar ataxia

    Roman Schniepp;Max Wuehr;Cornelia Schlick;Sabrina Huth

  • High-dosage betahistine dihydrochloride between 288 and 480 mg/day in patients with severe Menière’s disease: a case series

    Franziska Lezius;Christine Adrion;Ulrich Mansmann;Klaus Jahn

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas Brandt
Thomas Brandt Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Michael Strupp
Michael Strupp Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Marianne Dieterich
Marianne Dieterich Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Stefan Glasauer
Stefan Glasauer Brandenburg University of Technology
Peter Bartenstein
Peter Bartenstein Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Mayank B. Dutia
Mayank B. Dutia University of Edinburgh
Andreas Straube
Andreas Straube Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Thomas Klopstock
Thomas Klopstock Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Reinhard Hohlfeld
Reinhard Hohlfeld Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Matthias Brendel
Matthias Brendel Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Klaus Jahn

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles