World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Dominik Straumann

Dominik Straumann

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 52 5329 4895 127 117 303 9821

Dominik Straumann publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Dominik Straumann between 1991 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Dominik Straumann published across 35 years, from 1991 to 2025, averaging 9.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2015. 10 of the 321 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2015. 1991: 6 publications 1992: 9 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 1 publication 1999: 5 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 20 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 16 publications 2011: 16 publications 2012: 22 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 23 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 6 publications
1991 2025

321 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Dominik Straumann: publications per year, 1991 to 2025
Year Publications
1991 6
1992 9
1993 3
1994 3
1995 4
1996 4
1997 1
1998 1
1999 5
2000 5
2001 6
2002 5
2003 9
2004 8
2005 9
2006 6
2007 9
2008 20
2009 12
2010 16
2011 16
2012 22
2013 17
2014 11
2015 23
2016 11
2017 14
2018 8
2019 8
2020 13
2021 13
2022 7
2023 7
2024 4
2025 6
Total 321
Download as CSV

Dominik Straumann publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dominik Straumann sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 298–307 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 303 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127 303
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Dominik Straumann D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dominik Straumann sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52–53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418 52
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Dominik Straumann is affiliated with the University of Zurich in Switzerland. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience, with a significant focus on Neurology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Ophthalmology, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Epidemiology.

Their work concentrates on multiple main topics, including vestibular and auditory disorders, ophthalmology and eye disorders, glaucoma and retinal disorders, cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, traumatic brain injury research, hearing, cochlea, tinnitus genetics, and balance, gait, and falls prevention.

Frequent publication venues for Straumann's research are Frontiers in Neurology, Scientific Reports, The Cerebellum, PLoS ONE, and the Journal of Neurology.

They regularly collaborate with a number of co-authors, among them Michael Strupp, Christoph Helmchen, Stefan Yu Bögli, Alexander A. Tarnutzer, and Nina Feddermann-Demont.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Straumann include:

  • A model-based quantification of startle reflex habituation in larval zebrafish, 2021, Scientific Reports
  • Consensus on Virtual Management of Vestibular Disorders: Urgent Versus Expedited Care, 2020, The Cerebellum
  • Gentle rocking movements during sleep in the elderly, 2020, Journal of Sleep Research
  • Beyond sensory conflict: The role of beliefs and perception in motion sickness, 2021, PLoS ONE
  • Fall-related functional impairments in patients with neurological gait disorder, 2020, Scientific Reports

Best Publications

  • Bilateral vestibulopathy: Diagnostic criteria Consensus document of the Classification Committee of the Bárány Society.

    Michael Strupp;Ji Soo Kim;Toshihisa Murofushi;Dominik Straumann

  • Leitlinien für Diagnostik und Therapie in der Neurologie

    H. C. Diener;C. Weimar;P. Berlit;G. Deuschl

  • Accuracy of the bedside head impulse test in detecting vestibular hypofunction

    M Jorns-Häderli;D Straumann;A Palla

  • Vestibular paroxysmia: Diagnostic criteria.

    Michael Strupp;Jose A. Lopez-Escamez;Ji Soo Kim;Dominik Straumann

  • Moving in a Moving World: A Review on Vestibular Motion Sickness

    Giovanni Bertolini;Dominik Straumann

  • Referral and final diagnoses of patients assessed in an academic vertigo center

    Rebekka Geser;Dominik Straumann

  • Listing's law for eye, head and arm movements and their synergistic control.

    D. Straumann;Th. Haslwanter;M. C. Hepp-Reymond;K. Hepp

  • Caloric and search-coil head-impulse testing in patients after vestibular neuritis.

    A Schmid-Priscoveanu;A Böhmer;H Obzina;D Straumann

  • Single motor unit activity in human extraocular muscles during the vestibulo-ocular reflex

    Konrad P. Weber;Sally M. Rosengren;Sally M. Rosengren;Rike Michels;Veit Sturm

  • Transient torsion during and after saccades

    D. Straumann;D.S. Zee;D. Solomon;A.G. Lasker

  • Deficits in torsional and vertical rapid eye movements and shift of Listing's plane after uni- and bilateral lesions of the rostral interstitial nucleus of the medial longitudinal fasciculus

    Y. Suzuki;J. A. Büttner-Ennever;D. Straumann;K. Hepp

  • Mitochondrial Diseases Represent a Risk Factor for Valproate-Induced Fulminant Liver Failure

    Stephan Krähenbühl;Sebastian Brandner;Stephanie Kleinle;Sabina Liechti

  • What domains of clinical function should be assessed after sport-related concussion? A systematic review.

    Nina Feddermann-Demont;Ruben J Echemendia;Kathryn J Schneider;Gary S Solomon

  • Gravity dependence of ocular drift in patients with cerebellar downbeat nystagmus

    Sarah Marti;Antonella Palla;Dominik Straumann

  • Static roll and pitch in the monkey: shift and rotation of Listing's plane.

    Th. Haslwanter;D. Straumann;B.J.M. Hess;V. Henn

  • Gravity dependence of subjective visual vertical variability.

    A A Tarnutzer;C J Bockisch;D Straumann;I Olasagasti

  • Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and reliability of the german version of the dizziness handicap inventory.

    Annette Kurre;Christel J. A. W. van Gool;Caroline H. G. Bastiaenen;Thomas Gloor-Juzi

  • Two- rather than three-dimensional representation of saccades in monkey superior colliculus

    AJ van Opstal;K Hepp;BJ Hess;D Straumann

  • Calibration of three-dimensional eye position using search coil signals in the rhesus monkey

    B.J.M. Hess;A.J. Van Opstal;D. Straumann;K. Hepp

  • Pearls & Oy-sters: The medial longitudinal fasciculus in ocular motor physiology

    T. C. Frohman;S. Galetta;R. Fox;D. Solomon

Frequent Co-Authors

Volker Henn
Volker Henn University of Zurich
David S. Zee
David S. Zee Johns Hopkins University
Stefan Glasauer
Stefan Glasauer Brandenburg University of Technology
Adolfo M. Bronstein
Adolfo M. Bronstein Imperial College London
Stephan C.F. Neuhauss
Stephan C.F. Neuhauss University of Zurich
Andreas Sprenger
Andreas Sprenger University of Lübeck
Peter Brugger
Peter Brugger University of Zurich
Thomas Brandt
Thomas Brandt Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Christoph Helmchen
Christoph Helmchen University of Lübeck
Michael Rufer
Michael Rufer University of Zurich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Neuroscience students often explore adjacent career fields such as counseling, family therapy, and psychology. Many accredited programs are now available online, making education both accessible and flexible. For those considering a counseling career, it's important to choose cacrep-accredited programs online to ensure you receive a recognized and rigorous education.

Budget-conscious students can also explore the cheapest online counseling degree options. This allows you to pursue your studies without accumulating excessive student debt. If you're interested in working with couples and families, earning an mft degree can open doors to diverse clinical settings.

For specialization or advancement, you might wonder how much is a master's degree in psychology. Understanding the cost and curriculum helps you plan your educational journey. Each of these pathways can complement a neuroscience background and broaden your career opportunities in healthcare, academia, or research.

Best Scientists Citing Dominik Straumann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles