World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
Spain
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
108
Citations
58584
World Ranking
258
National Ranking
3

Mel Slater publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mel Slater sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 408 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Mel Slater D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mel Slater sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 108 D-Index — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Computer Science in Spain Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in Spain Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Computer Science in Spain Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in Spain Leader Award

Overview

Mel Slater is affiliated with the University of Barcelona in Spain and has a research profile characterized by a strong focus on virtual and augmented reality, as well as their psychological and technological implications. Their body of work intersects computer science and psychology, with 52 publications in computer science and 50 in psychology.

Their research spans prominent subfields such as human-computer interaction, cognitive neuroscience, social psychology, computer vision and pattern recognition, and clinical psychology.

The primary research topics addressed by Slater include:

  • Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
  • Augmented Reality Applications
  • Health disparities and outcomes

Slater has contributed multiple papers to influential publication venues with a high output in "Frontiers in Virtual Reality," along with publications in "Nature Mental Health," "Scientific Reports," "Frontiers in Psychology," and "Virtual Reality."

Recent representative papers authored by Slater include:

  • The Ethics of Realism in Virtual and Augmented Reality (2020) in Frontiers in Virtual Reality
  • A Separate Reality: An Update on Place Illusion and Plausibility in Virtual Reality (2022) in Frontiers in Virtual Reality

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Slater are Bernhard Spanlang, Alejandro Beacco, Domna Banakou, Jaime Gallego, and Maria V. Sánchez-Vives, with multiple joint publications documented.

The research conducted by Slater often explores the intersection of immersive technology and human cognition or social behavior, investigating topics such as virtual body ownership, implicit racial bias, and the psychological effects related to virtual environments.

Best Publications

  • A framework for immersive virtual environments five: Speculations on the role of presence in virtual environments

    Mel Slater;Sylvia Wilbur

  • Place Illusion and Plausibility Can Lead to Realistic Behaviour in Immersive Virtual Environments

    Mel Slater

  • From presence to consciousness through virtual reality

    Maria V. Sanchez-Vives;Mel Slater

  • Depth of presence in virtual environments

    Mel Slater;Martin Usoh;Anthony Steed

  • Enhancing Our Lives with Immersive Virtual Reality

    Mel Slater;Mel Slater;Mel Slater;Maria V. Sanchez-Vives;Maria V. Sanchez-Vives

  • The sense of embodiment in virtual reality

    Konstantina Kilteni;Raphaela Groten;Mel Slater

  • Virtual reality in the assessment, understanding, and treatment of mental health disorders.

    D Freeman;S Reeve;A Robinson;A Ehlers

  • Walking > walking-in-place > flying, in virtual environments

    Martin Usoh;Kevin Arthur;Mary C. Whitton;Rui Bastos

  • Using Presence Questionnaires in Reality

    Martin Usoh;Ernest Catena;Sima Arman;Mel Slater

  • First person experience of body transfer in virtual reality.

    Mel Slater;Mel Slater;Bernhard Spanlang;Bernhard Spanlang;María Victoria Sánchez-Vives;Olaf Blanke

  • Measuring Presence: A Response to the Witmer and Singer Presence Questionnaire

    Mel Slater

  • Putting yourself in the skin of a black avatar reduces implicit racial bias

    Tabitha C. Peck;Sofia Seinfeld;Salvatore M. Aglioti;Mel Slater

  • Taking steps: the influence of a walking technique on presence in virtual reality

    Mel Slater;Martin Usoh;Anthony Steed

  • A Virtual Presence Counter

    Mel Slater;Anthony Steed

  • Immersive journalism: Immersive virtual reality for the first-person experience of news

    Nonny de la Peòa;Peggy Weil;Joan Llobera;Bernhard Spanlang

  • Illusory ownership of a virtual child body causes overestimation of object sizes and implicit attitude changes

    Domna Banakou;Raphaela Groten;Mel Slater

  • Behavioral, Neural, and Computational Principles of Bodily Self-Consciousness

    Olaf Blanke;Olaf Blanke;Mel Slater;Mel Slater;Andrea Serino

  • An experiment on public speaking anxiety in response to three different types of virtual audience

    David-Paul Pertaub;Mel Slater;Chris Barker

  • Inducing illusory ownership of a virtual body

    Mel Slater;Daniel Perez-Marcos;H. Henrik Ehrsson;María Victoria Sánchez-Vives;María Victoria Sánchez-Vives

  • Immersion and the illusion of presence in virtual reality.

    Mel Slater;Mel Slater

  • Self-paced (asynchronous) BCI control of a wheelchair in virtual environments: a case study with a tetraplegic

    Robert Leeb;Doron Friedman;Gernot R. Müller-Putz;Reinhold Scherer

  • Putting yourself in the skin of a black avatar reduces implicit racial bias consciousness and cognition

    Tabitha C. Peck;Sofia Seinfeld;Salvatore M. Aglioti;Mel Slater

Frequent Co-Authors

Anthony Steed
Anthony Steed University College London
Maria V. Sanchez-Vives
Maria V. Sanchez-Vives Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats
Daniel Freeman
Daniel Freeman University of Oxford
Christoph Guger
Christoph Guger Graz University of Technology
Robert Leeb
Robert Leeb MindMaze
Gert Pfurtscheller
Gert Pfurtscheller Graz University of Technology
Graham Dunn
Graham Dunn University of Manchester
Mar Gonzalez-Franco
Mar Gonzalez-Franco Microsoft (United States)
Philippa Garety
Philippa Garety King's College London
Chris Barker
Chris Barker University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring pathways beyond a traditional Computer Science degree can open more doors in tech and related fields. For those seeking faster entry into the workforce, enrollment in online associates programs is a popular choice. These degrees often focus on practical IT skills, offering a flexible and affordable start to your career.

If you already hold a bachelor’s degree, pursuing one of the quickest online masters degree options can help you upskill in as little as a year. Fast-paced programs allow you to specialize and boost your professional value without a long time commitment.

Carefully consider advanced programs—some graduate degrees that are worth it lead to higher salaries and robust job growth in fields like data science, cybersecurity, and artificial intelligence.

Professional certifications are another smart route. Earning certifications that pay well can showcase your skills to employers and speed up your entrance into high-demand careers, often without the need for a full degree.

Best Scientists Citing Mel Slater

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles