World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Robert Leeb

Robert Leeb

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
43
Citations
11437
World Ranking
7816
National Ranking
146

Robert Leeb publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert Leeb sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 161 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Robert Leeb D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert Leeb sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert Leeb is affiliated with MindMaze in Switzerland and is known for contributions to neuroscience and computer science fields. Their research spans cognitive neuroscience, human-computer interaction, artificial intelligence, rehabilitation, and biomedical engineering.

The scientist's main fields of study include:

  • Neuroscience
  • Computer Science

Subfields covered in their work include:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Rehabilitation
  • Biomedical Engineering

The principal research topics associated with Robert Leeb focus on:

  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Time Series Analysis and Forecasting
  • Data Stream Mining Techniques

Among recent scholarly works, Robert Leeb has authored and co-authored the following papers:

  • Brain-computer interfaces and virtual reality for neurorehabilitation, 2020, Handbook of clinical neurology
  • Motor Recovery After Stroke by Means of BCI-Guided Functional Electrical Stimulation, 2020, Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne)
  • Context-Aware Learning for Generative Models, 2020, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems
  • Quantifying the impact and profiling functional EEG artifacts, 2022, 2022 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC)
  • Dual-Frequency Ssvep Stimulation Using A Stereoscopic Display, 2020, HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Robert Leeb include:

  • José del R. Millán
  • Serafeim Perdikis
  • Daniel Pérez-Marcos
  • Andrea Biasiucci
  • Abdul Al-Khodairy

Publication venues where Robert Leeb's work has appeared include:

  • Handbook of clinical neurology
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne)
  • IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems
  • 2022 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC)
  • HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)

Best Publications

  • Review of the BCI Competition IV

    Michael Tangermann;Klaus Robert Müller;Ad Aertsen;Niels Birbaumer

  • Combining Brain-Computer Interfaces and Assistive Technologies: State-of-the-Art and Challenges.

    José del R. Millán;Rüdiger Rupp;Gernot Müller-Putz;Rod Murray-Smith

  • A fully automated correction method of EOG artifacts in EEG recordings.

    Alois Schlögl;Claudia Keinrath;Doris Zimmermann;Reinhold Scherer

  • Self-paced (asynchronous) BCI control of a wheelchair in virtual environments: a case study with a tetraplegic

    Robert Leeb;Doron Friedman;Gernot R. Müller-Putz;Reinhold Scherer

  • Brain–Computer Communication: Motivation, Aim, and Impact of Exploring a Virtual Apartment

    R. Leeb;F. Lee;C. Keinrath;R. Scherer

  • Better than random: A closer look on BCI results

    Gernot Mueller-Putz;Reinhold Scherer;Clemens Brunner;Robert Leeb

  • Brain-Computer Interfaces, Virtual Reality, and Videogames

    A. Lecuyer;F. Lotte;R.B. Reilly;R. Leeb

  • Seperability of four-class motor imagery data using independent components analysis

    Muhammad Naeem;Clemens Brunner;Robert Leeb;Bernhard Graimann

  • Walking from thought.

    Gert Pfurtscheller;Robert Leeb;Claudia Keinrath;Doron Friedman

  • BCI Competition 2008 { Graz data set B

    R. Leeb;C. Brunner

  • Toward Self-Paced Brain–Computer Communication: Navigation Through Virtual Worlds

    R. Scherer;F. Lee;A. Schlogl;R. Leeb

  • A hybrid brain-computer interface based on the fusion of electroencephalographic and electromyographic activities.

    Robert Leeb;Hesam Sagha;Ricardo Chavarriaga;José del R Millán

  • Spatial filtering and selection of optimized components in four class motor imagery EEG data using independent components analysis

    Clemens Brunner;Muhammad Naeem;Robert Leeb;Bernhard Graimann

  • 15 years of BCI research at graz university of technology: current projects

    G. Pfurtscheller;G.R. Muller-Putz;A. Schlogl;B. Graimann

  • Towards Independence: A BCI Telepresence Robot for People With Severe Motor Disabilities

    Robert Leeb;Luca Tonin;Martin Rohm;Lorenzo Desideri

  • Analysis of physiological responses to a social situation in an immersive virtual environment

    Mel Slater;Christoph Guger;Guenter Edlinger;Robert Leeb

  • Transferring brain-computer interfaces beyond the laboratory

    Robert Leeb;Serafeim Perdikis;Luca Tonin;Andrea Biasiucci

  • Combining BCI with Virtual Reality: Towards New Applications and Improved BCI

    Fabien Lotte;Josef Faller;Christoph Guger;Yann Renard

  • Better than random: a closer look on BCI results

    Gernot R. Müller-Putz;Reinhold Scherer;Clemens Brunner;Robert Leeb

  • Towards Noninvasive Hybrid Brain–Computer Interfaces: Framework, Practice, Clinical Application, and Beyond

    Gernot Muller-Putz;Robert Leeb;Michael Tangermann;Johannes Hohne

Frequent Co-Authors

José del R. Millán
José del R. Millán The University of Texas at Austin
Gert Pfurtscheller
Gert Pfurtscheller Graz University of Technology
Mel Slater
Mel Slater University of Barcelona
Gernot R. Müller-Putz
Gernot R. Müller-Putz Graz University of Technology
Reinhold Scherer
Reinhold Scherer University of Essex
Ricardo Chavarriaga
Ricardo Chavarriaga École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Christa Neuper
Christa Neuper University of Graz
Clemens Brunner
Clemens Brunner University of Graz
Christoph Guger
Christoph Guger Graz University of Technology
Horst Bischof
Horst Bischof Graz University of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in Computer Science but seeking flexible or alternative options, online degrees offer valuable pathways to jumpstart your tech career. Many students now pursue an associate degree in 6 months online, allowing a rapid entry into the IT workforce and making it easier to upskill or transfer to more advanced programs.

For those interested in the intersection of technology and management, accredited online business schools provide business-focused degree options that blend well with computer science skills—opening up roles in tech management and entrepreneurship.

Affordability is often a top concern for students. Exploring the cheapest online university options can dramatically reduce education costs, making a computer science or related degree more accessible without sacrificing quality.

Finally, for those drawn to hands-on problem solving and innovation, pursuing an engineering online degree is an attractive alternative. These programs offer career pathways in software engineering, data analytics, and digital infrastructure—all fields closely aligned with computer science.

Best Scientists Citing Robert Leeb

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles