World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 42 8347 8111 155 154 187 7856

Ricardo Chavarriaga publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ricardo Chavarriaga between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ricardo Chavarriaga published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 9.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2011. 13 of the 221 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2011. 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 5 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 6 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 25 publications 2012: 17 publications 2013: 18 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 16 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 8 publications
2003 2025

221 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ricardo Chavarriaga: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 1
2004 1
2005 5
2006 1
2007 6
2008 9
2009 6
2010 15
2011 25
2012 17
2013 18
2014 13
2015 16
2016 11
2017 12
2018 8
2019 8
2020 8
2021 16
2022 6
2023 6
2024 5
2025 8
Total 221
Download as CSV

Ricardo Chavarriaga publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ricardo Chavarriaga sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 182–191 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 187 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583 187
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Ricardo Chavarriaga D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ricardo Chavarriaga sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821 42
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Ricardo Chavarriaga is affiliated with the École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne in Switzerland. Their research spans multiple areas primarily within neuroscience, with a focus on cognitive neuroscience, artificial intelligence, and cellular and molecular neuroscience.

Their work addresses neuroengineering and brain-computer interfaces, with a significant presence in the EEG and brain-computer interface domain. Additional research topics covered include neural dynamics and brain function, ethics in clinical research, visual perception and processing mechanisms, and virtual reality applications and impacts.

Ricardo Chavarriaga has contributed to the following recent papers:

  • International data governance for neuroscience (2021), published in Neuron
  • Mobile brain/body imaging of landmark-based navigation with high-density EEG (2021), published in European Journal of Neuroscience
  • Customizing skills for assistive robotic manipulators, an inverse reinforcement learning approach with error-related potentials (2021), published in Communications Biology
  • Machine-Learning Based Monitoring of Cognitive Workload in Rescue Missions With Drones (2022), published in IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
  • Towards a Governance Framework for Brain Data (2022), published in Neuroethics

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Ricardo Chavarriaga include:

  • José del R. Millán
  • Matthew L. Bolton
  • Luke
  • Michael C. Dorneich
  • Giancarlo Fortino

The venues where Ricardo Chavarriaga has most frequently published are:

  • IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Neural Engineering
  • iScience
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

The main field of study for Ricardo Chavarriaga's work is Neuroscience. This broad field encompasses several specific subfields with their research contributions including:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Social Psychology

Best Publications

  • Collecting complex activity datasets in highly rich networked sensor environments

    Daniel Roggen;Alberto Calatroni;Mirco Rossi;Thomas Holleczek

  • The Opportunity challenge: A benchmark database for on-body sensor-based activity recognition

    Ricardo Chavarriaga;Hesam Sagha;Alberto Calatroni;Sundara Tejaswi Digumarti

  • Learning From EEG Error-Related Potentials in Noninvasive Brain-Computer Interfaces

    R Chavarriaga;José del R. Millán

  • Errare machinale est: the use of error-related potentials in brain-machine interfaces.

    Ricardo Chavarriaga;Aleksander Sobolewski;José del R. Millán

  • Detection of self-paced reaching movement intention from EEG signals

    Eileen Lew;Ricardo Chavarriaga;Stefano Silvoni;José del R. Millán

  • A hybrid brain-computer interface based on the fusion of electroencephalographic and electromyographic activities.

    Robert Leeb;Hesam Sagha;Ricardo Chavarriaga;José del R Millán

  • Teaching brain-machine interfaces as an alternative paradigm to neuroprosthetics control.

    Iñaki Iturrate;Iñaki Iturrate;Ricardo Chavarriaga;Luis Montesano;Javier Minguez

  • Is there a geometric module for spatial orientation? Insights from a rodent navigation model.

    Denis Sheynikhovich;Ricardo Chavarriaga;Thomas Strösslin;Angelo Arleo

  • Brain-coupled interaction for semi-autonomous navigation of an assistive robot

    Xavier Perrin;Ricardo Chavarriaga;Francis Colas;Roland Siegwart

  • A brain-controlled exoskeleton with cascaded event-related desynchronization classifiers

    Kyuhwa Lee;Dong Liu;Laetitia Perroud;Ricardo Chavarriaga

  • Non-Invasive Brain-Machine Interaction

    José del R. Millán;José del R. Millán;Pierre W. Ferrez;Pierre W. Ferrez;Ferran Galán;Ferran Galán;Eileen Lew;Eileen Lew

  • OPPORTUNITY: Towards opportunistic activity and context recognition systems

    Daniel Roggen;Kilian Forster;Alberto Calatroni;Thomas Holleczek

  • Benchmarking classification techniques using the Opportunity human activity dataset

    Hesam Sagha;Sundara Tejaswi Digumarti;Jose del R. Millan;Ricardo Chavarriaga

  • EEG-based decoding of error-related brain activity in a real-world driving task.

    Huaijian Zhang;Ricardo Chavarriaga;Zahra Khaliliardali;Lucian Andrei Gheorghe

  • Tiny noise, big mistakes: adversarial perturbations induce errors in brain–computer interface spellers

    Xiao Zhang;Dongrui Wu;Lieyun Ding;Hanbin Luo

  • Heading for new shores! Overcoming pitfalls in BCI design.

    Ricardo Chavarriaga;Melanie Fried-Oken;Sonja Kleih;Fabien Lotte

  • 2005 Special issue: Robust self-localisation and navigation based on hippocampal place cells

    Thomas Strösslin;Denis Sheynikhovich;Ricardo Chavarriaga;Wulfram Gerstner

  • Single trial analysis of slow cortical potentials: a study on anticipation related potentials

    Gangadhar Garipelli;Ricardo Chavarriaga;José del R Millán

  • Multimodal Fusion of Muscle and Brain Signals for a Hybrid-BCI

    Robert Leeb;Hesam Sagha;Ricardo Chavarriaga;Jose del. R. Millan

  • Opportunistic human activity and context recognition

    D. Roggen;Gerhard Troster;P. Lukowicz;A. Ferscha

  • A computational model of parallel navigation systems in rodents.

    Ricardo Chavarriaga;Thomas Strösslin;Denis Sheynikhovich;Wulfram Gerstner

Frequent Co-Authors

José del R. Millán
José del R. Millán The University of Texas at Austin
Robert Leeb
Robert Leeb MindMaze
Daniel Roggen
Daniel Roggen University of Sussex
Alois Ferscha
Alois Ferscha Johannes Kepler University of Linz
Paul Lukowicz
Paul Lukowicz German Research Centre for Artificial Intelligence
Wulfram Gerstner
Wulfram Gerstner École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Fabien Lotte
Fabien Lotte French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA
Jocelyne Bloch
Jocelyne Bloch University of Lausanne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you consider a degree in Computer Science in the USA, it's helpful to explore related online study options that can diversify your skills and accelerate your career. Flexible online programs offer you the chance to balance education with work and other commitments, while often reducing overall costs.

For those interested in the intersection of technology and business, online mba programs affordable provide technical professionals with management and leadership expertise—often at a lower cost than traditional on-campus MBAs. If you’re looking for a shorter, intensive route, many 1 year online masters programs help students quickly advance their knowledge and qualifications.

Some students prioritize job prospects and earning potential. In that case, exploring online degrees that pay well is a strategic move, with fields like data science and information security in high demand. Additionally, for those curious about the future of technology, the best online ai degree programs offer a foundation in AI, preparing graduates for fast-growing roles in artificial intelligence and machine learning.

Best Scientists Citing Ricardo Chavarriaga

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles