World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
52
Citations
13105
World Ranking
5237
National Ranking
126

Jocelyne Bloch publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jocelyne Bloch sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 147 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Jocelyne Bloch D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jocelyne Bloch sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jocelyne Bloch is affiliated with the University of Lausanne in Switzerland. Their research predominantly spans the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience, with a focus on several subfields including Neurology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Cognitive Neuroscience, Biomedical Engineering, and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience.

The scientist's main topics of work cover areas related to neurological disorders and treatments, spinal cord injury research, muscle activation and electromyography studies, Parkinson's disease mechanisms and treatments, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, neuroscience and neural engineering, as well as nerve injury and rehabilitation.

Jocelyne Bloch has contributed to a number of publications, with recent significant papers including:

  • Walking naturally after spinal cord injury using a brain-spine interface (2023, Nature)
  • Activity-dependent spinal cord neuromodulation rapidly restores trunk and leg motor functions after complete paralysis (2022, Nature Medicine)
  • The neurons that restore walking after paralysis (2022, Nature)
  • Recruitment of upper-limb motoneurons with epidural electrical stimulation of the cervical spinal cord (2021, Nature Communications)
  • Neuroprosthetic baroreflex controls haemodynamics after spinal cord injury (2021, Nature)

Their frequent publication venues reflect a consistent engagement with journals and repositories such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Nature, Nature Medicine, and Neurosurgery.

Jocelyne Bloch has worked extensively with a group of frequent co-authors including Grégoire Courtine, Stéphanie P. Lacour, Julien F. Bally, Jordan W. Squair, and Eduardo Martin Moraud.

Best Publications

  • Neurodegeneration prevented by lentiviral vector delivery of GDNF in primate models of Parkinson's disease.

    Jeffrey H. Kordower;Marina E. Emborg;Jocelyne Bloch;Shuang Y. Ma

  • Targeted neurotechnology restores walking in humans with spinal cord injury

    Fabien B. Wagner;Fabien B. Wagner;Jean-Baptiste Mignardot;Jean-Baptiste Mignardot;Camille G. Le Goff-Mignardot;Camille G. Le Goff-Mignardot;Robin Demesmaeker;Robin Demesmaeker

  • A brain–spine interface alleviating gait deficits after spinal cord injury in primates

    Marco Capogrosso;Tomislav Milekovic;David Borton;David Borton;Fabien Wagner

  • Walking naturally after spinal cord injury using a brain–spine interface

    Unknown

  • MGMT methylation analysis of glioblastoma on the Infinium methylation BeadChip identifies two distinct CpG regions associated with gene silencing and outcome, yielding a prediction model for comparisons across datasets, tumor grades, and CIMP-status

    Pierre Bady;Davide Sciuscio;Annie Claire Diserens;Jocelyne Bloch

  • Isolation of multipotent neural precursors residing in the cortex of the adult human brain.

    Yvan Arsenijevic;Jean-Guy Villemure;Jean-François Brunet;Jocelyne J. Bloch

  • Enzymatic incorporation of bioactive peptides into fibrin matrices enhances neurite extension.

    Jason C. Schense;Jason C. Schense;Jocelyne Bloch;Patrick Aebischer;Jeffrey A. Hubbell

  • Nogo-A-specific antibody treatment enhances sprouting and functional recovery after cervical lesion in adult primates.

    Patrick Freund;Eric Schmidlin;Thierry Wannier;Thierry Wannier;Jocelyne Bloch

  • Spatiotemporal neuromodulation therapies engaging muscle synergies improve motor control after spinal cord injury

    Nikolaus Wenger;Nikolaus Wenger;Eduardo Martin Moraud;Jerome Gandar;Pavel Musienko

  • Electrical spinal cord stimulation must preserve proprioception to enable locomotion in humans with spinal cord injury.

    Emanuele Formento;Karen Minassian;Fabien Wagner;Jean-Baptiste Mignardot

  • The neurons that restore walking after paralysis

    Unknown

  • Neuroprotective gene therapy for Huntington's disease, using polymer-encapsulated cells engineered to secrete human ciliary neurotrophic factor: results of a phase I study.

    J. Bloch;A.C. Bachoud-Lévi;N. Déglon;J.P. Lefaucheur

  • Lentiviral gene transfer to the nonhuman primate brain.

    Jeffrey H Kordower;Jocelyne Bloch;Shuang Y Ma;Yaping Chu

  • Anti-Nogo-A antibody treatment enhances sprouting of corticospinal axons rostral to a unilateral cervical spinal cord lesion in adult macaque monkey.

    Patrick Freund;Thierry Wannier;Thierry Wannier;Eric Schmidlin;Jocelyne Bloch

  • Cerebral metabolic effects of exogenous lactate supplementation on the injured human brain.

    Pierre Bouzat;Pierre Bouzat;Nathalie Sala;Tamarah Suys;Jean-Baptiste Zerlauth

  • Pronounced species divergence in corticospinal tract reorganization and functional recovery after lateralized spinal cord injury favors primates

    Lucia Friedli;Ephron S. Rosenzweig;Quentin Barraud;Martin Schubert

  • Neuroprotective Gene Therapy for Huntington’s Disease Using a Polymer Encapsulated BHK Cell Line Engineered to Secrete Human CNTF

    A.-C. Bachoud-Lévi;N. Déglon;J.-P. Nguyen;J. Bloch

  • Anti-Nogo-A antibody treatment promotes recovery of manual dexterity after unilateral cervical lesion in adult primates--re-examination and extension of behavioral data.

    Patrick Freund;Eric Schmidlin;Thierry Wannier;Thierry Wannier;Jocelyne Bloch

  • Long-term outcome of 50 consecutive Parkinson's disease patients treated with subthalamic deep brain stimulation.

    C. Wider;Claudio Pollo;J. Bloch;Pierre Burkhard

  • Recruitment of upper-limb motoneurons with epidural electrical stimulation of the cervical spinal cord.

    Nathan Greiner;Beatrice Barra;Giuseppe Schiavone;Henri Lorach

  • Restoration of cognitive and motor functions by ciliary neurotrophic factor in a primate model of Huntington's disease.

    Vincent Mittoux;Jean-Marc Joseph;Franç Oise Conde;Stephane Palfi

  • Nerve growth factor- and neurotrophin-3-releasing guidance channels promote regeneration of the transected rat dorsal root.

    Jocelyne Bloch;Eric G. Fine;Eric G. Fine;Nicolas Bouche;Anne D. Zurn

  • Progressive plastic changes in the hand representation of the primary motor cortex parallel incomplete recovery from a unilateral section of the corticospinal tract at cervical level in monkeys.

    Eric Schmidlin;Thierry Wannier;Thierry Wannier;Jocelyne Bloch;Eric M Rouiller

Frequent Co-Authors

Grégoire Courtine
Grégoire Courtine École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Eric M. Rouiller
Eric M. Rouiller University of Fribourg
Stéphanie P. Lacour
Stéphanie P. Lacour École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Patrick Aebischer
Patrick Aebischer École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Silvestro Micera
Silvestro Micera Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies
Erwan Bezard
Erwan Bezard University of Bordeaux
Martin E. Schwab
Martin E. Schwab University of Zurich
Nicole Déglon
Nicole Déglon University of Lausanne
Mauro Oddo
Mauro Oddo University of Lausanne
Patrick Freund
Patrick Freund University of Zurich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in neuroscience can open doors to related fields such as psychology, social work, and marriage and family therapy. For those seeking flexibility, many institutions now offer online degrees, making it easier to balance education with other responsibilities.

Affordability is a major concern for prospective students. It's important to research how much is a psychology degree online, as tuition and fees can vary widely by program and location. Understanding costs upfront helps with planning and managing student loans or budgets.

If you're interested in social work, consider pursuing an online master's in social work for a pathway into clinical or community roles. Those aiming for clinical psychology careers can look into psyd online programs, which prepare graduates for licensure as psychologists.

Another option is becoming a marriage and family therapist. Accelerated education options are available; discover the best online mft programs if you want to earn your credential quickly and efficiently.

Exploring these diverse but related online degrees can help you find the right career pathway aligned with your interests in neuroscience and human behavior.

Best Scientists Citing Jocelyne Bloch

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles