What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Neuroscience
- Internal medicine
- Neuron
His primary areas of investigation include Spinal cord injury, Spinal cord, Neuroscience, Gait and Neuroplasticity.
The concepts of his Spinal cord injury study are interwoven with issues in Neuromodulation, Stimulation, Proprioception and Electromyography.
His work deals with themes such as Lesion, Brain–computer interface, Motor control and Reflex, which intersect with Spinal cord.
His Neuroscience research incorporates themes from Hindlimb, Anesthesia and Regeneration.
His studies deal with areas such as Peroneus longus and Trunk as well as Gait.
His Neuroplasticity research incorporates elements of Brainstem and Nervous system.
His most cited work include:
- Electronic dura mater for long-term multimodal neural interfaces (505 citations)
- Recovery of supraspinal control of stepping via indirect propriospinal relay connections after spinal cord injury. (503 citations)
- Restoring Voluntary Control of Locomotion after Paralyzing Spinal Cord Injury (499 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Grégoire Courtine mainly investigates Spinal cord injury, Neuroscience, Spinal cord, Physical medicine and rehabilitation and Stimulation.
His work carried out in the field of Spinal cord injury brings together such families of science as Rehabilitation, Gait, Motor control, Neuromodulation and Neuroplasticity.
His Neuroscience research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Hindlimb and Paralysis.
His study explores the link between Spinal cord and topics such as Regeneration that cross with problems in Spontaneous recovery and Myelin.
His work in the fields of Physical medicine and rehabilitation, such as Proprioception, Balance and Electromyography, intersects with other areas such as Augment.
His study focuses on the intersection of Stimulation and fields such as Anesthesia with connections in the field of Agonist.
He most often published in these fields:
- Spinal cord injury (63.04%)
- Neuroscience (55.43%)
- Spinal cord (46.74%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2019-2021)?
- Neuroscience (55.43%)
- Stimulation (28.26%)
- Neuromodulation (22.83%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Grégoire Courtine mostly deals with Neuroscience, Stimulation, Neuromodulation, Biomedical engineering and Spinal cord injury.
His Feed forward research extends to the thematically linked field of Neuroscience.
His study in Stimulation is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Paralysis, Anesthesia and Efferent.
The Neuromodulation study combines topics in areas such as Translational research, Deep brain stimulation and Biological neural network.
His work blends Spinal cord injury and Repulsive guidance molecule A studies together.
His Spinal cord research focuses on Motor control and how it connects with Macaque and Lumbosacral joint.
Between 2019 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Soft, Implantable Bioelectronic Interfaces for Translational Research (13 citations)
- Soft, Implantable Bioelectronic Interfaces for Translational Research (13 citations)
- Structured nanoscale metallic glass fibres with extreme aspect ratios (11 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Neuroscience
- Internal medicine
- Neuron
Grégoire Courtine mainly focuses on Neuroscience, Stimulation, Spinal cord, Spinal cord injury and Computational biology.
His Neuroscience study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Salient and Feed forward.
His research in Stimulation intersects with topics in Macaque, Upper limb, Motor control and Lumbosacral joint.
His Lumbosacral joint research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Epidural space and Primate.
His Spinal cord research includes themes of Hemodynamics, Vascular resistance and Efferent.
His work in Computational biology is not limited to one particular discipline; it also encompasses Biological neural network.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
