World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
49
Citations
11556
World Ranking
5904
National Ranking
4

Yury Gerasimenko publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Yury Gerasimenko sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 157 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Yury Gerasimenko D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Yury Gerasimenko sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Yury Gerasimenko is affiliated with the Pavlov Institute of Physiology of the Russian Academy of Sciences in the Russian Federation. Their research primarily focuses on Medicine and Neuroscience, with significant contributions in subfields such as Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Neurology, Surgery, Rehabilitation, and Cognitive Neuroscience.

The scientist's work addresses key topics including Spinal Cord Injury Research, Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation, Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies, Muscle Activation and Electromyography Studies, Pain Management and Treatment, and EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces.

Frequent collaborators in their research include Т. Р. Мошонкина, V. Reggie Edgerton, Alexander Ovechkin, Susan J. Harkema, and Е. А. Вершинина.

Gerasimenko has published extensively in journals with a focus on clinical and neurological medicine. The leading publication venues include:

  • Journal of Clinical Medicine
  • Life
  • NEUROSCIENCE FOR MEDICINE AND PSYCHOLOGY
  • Preprints.org
  • Nature Communications

Selected recent papers illustrate the scope of their research:

  • Noninvasive spinal stimulation safely enables upright posture in children with spinal cord injury, 2021, Nature Communications
  • Cervical Electrical Neuromodulation Effectively Enhances Hand Motor Output in Healthy Subjects by Engaging a Use-Dependent Intervention, 2021, Journal of Clinical Medicine
  • Novel Noninvasive Spinal Neuromodulation Strategy Facilitates Recovery of Stepping after Motor Complete Paraplegia, 2022, Journal of Clinical Medicine
  • Voluntary Modulation of Evoked Responses Generated by Epidural and Transcutaneous Spinal Stimulation in Humans with Spinal Cord Injury, 2021, Journal of Clinical Medicine
  • Transcutaneous Electrical Neuromodulation of the Cervical Spinal Cord Depends Both on the Stimulation Intensity and the Degree of Voluntary Activity for Training. A Pilot Study, 2021, Journal of Clinical Medicine

Best Publications

  • Effect of epidural stimulation of the lumbosacral spinal cord on voluntary movement, standing, and assisted stepping after motor complete paraplegia: a case study

    Susan Harkema;Susan Harkema;Yury Gerasimenko;Jonathan Hodes;Joel Burdick

  • Altering spinal cord excitability enables voluntary movements after chronic complete paralysis in humans

    Claudia A. Angeli;Claudia A. Angeli;V. Reggie Edgerton;Yury P. Gerasimenko;Susan J. Harkema;Susan J. Harkema

  • Transformation of nonfunctional spinal circuits into functional states after the loss of brain input.

    Grégoire Courtine;Yury Gerasimenko;Rubia van den Brand;Aileen Yew

  • Neuromodulation of lumbosacral spinal networks enables independent stepping after complete paraplegia

    Megan L. Gill;Peter J. Grahn;Jonathan S. Calvert;Margaux B. Linde

  • Training locomotor networks

    V. Reggie Edgerton;Grégoire Courtine;Yury P. Gerasimenko;Igor Lavrov

  • Noninvasive Reactivation of Motor Descending Control after Paralysis

    Yury P. Gerasimenko;Yury P. Gerasimenko;Daniel C. Lu;Morteza Modaber;Sharon Zdunowski

  • Transcutaneous electrical spinal-cord stimulation in humans

    Yury Gerasimenko;Ruslan Gorodnichev;Tatiana Moshonkina;Dimitry Sayenko

  • Epidural Stimulation : Comparison of the Spinal Circuits That Generate and Control Locomotion in Rats, Cats and Humans

    Yury Gerasimenko;Roland R. Roy;V. Reggie Edgerton

  • Plasticity of spinal cord reflexes after a complete transection in adult rats: relationship to stepping ability.

    Igor Lavrov;Yury P. Gerasimenko;Ronaldo M. Ichiyama;Gregoire Courtine

  • Self-Assisted Standing Enabled by Non-Invasive Spinal Stimulation after Spinal Cord Injury

    Dimitry G Sayenko;Mrinal Rath;Adam R Ferguson;Joel W Burdick

  • Enabling Task-Specific Volitional Motor Functions via Spinal Cord Neuromodulation in a Human With Paraplegia.

    Peter J. Grahn;Igor A. Lavrov;Dimitry G. Sayenko;Meegan G. Van Straaten

  • Initiation and modulation of locomotor circuitry output with multisite transcutaneous electrical stimulation of the spinal cord in noninjured humans.

    Yury P Gerasimenko;Ruslan Gorodnichev;Aleksandr Puhov;Tatiana Moshonkina

  • Spinal cord reflexes induced by epidural spinal cord stimulation in normal awake rats.

    Yury P. Gerasimenko;Igor A. Lavrov;Gregoire Courtine;Ronaldo M. Ichiyama

  • Modulation of multisegmental monosynaptic responses in a variety of leg muscles during walking and running in humans

    Grégoire Courtine;Susan J. Harkema;Susan J. Harkema;Christine J. Dy;Yuri P. Gerasimenko

  • Step Training Reinforces Specific Spinal Locomotor Circuitry in Adult Spinal Rats

    Ronaldo M Ichiyama;Grégoire Courtine;Yury P Gerasimenko;Grace J Yang

  • And yet it moves: Recovery of volitional control after spinal cord injury.

    G. Taccola;D. Sayenko;P. Gad;Y.P. Gerasimenko

  • Controlling Specific Locomotor Behaviors through Multidimensional Monoaminergic Modulation of Spinal Circuitries

    Pavel Musienko;Rubia van den Brand;Olivia Märzendorfer;Roland R. Roy

  • Epidural Stimulation Induced Modulation of Spinal Locomotor Networks in Adult Spinal Rats

    Igor Lavrov;Christine J. Dy;Andy J. Fong;Yury Gerasimenko

  • Non-Invasive Activation of Cervical Spinal Networks after Severe Paralysis

    Parag Gad;Sujin Lee;Nicholas Terrafranca;Hui Zhong

  • Epidural spinal cord stimulation plus quipazine administration enable stepping in complete spinal adult rats

    Yury P. Gerasimenko;Ronaldo M. Ichiyama;Igor A. Lavrov;Gregoire Courtine

  • Facilitation of Stepping with Epidural Stimulation in Spinal Rats: Role of Sensory Input

    Igor Lavrov;Grégoire Courtine;Christine J. Dy;Rubia van den Brand

Frequent Co-Authors

Roland R. Roy
Roland R. Roy University of California, Los Angeles
Hui Zhong
Hui Zhong University of California, Los Angeles
Grégoire Courtine
Grégoire Courtine École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Joel W. Burdick
Joel W. Burdick California Institute of Technology
Lisa A. Beck
Lisa A. Beck University of Rochester Medical Center
Adam R. Ferguson
Adam R. Ferguson University of California, San Francisco
Kendall H. Lee
Kendall H. Lee Mayo Clinic
Majid Sarrafzadeh
Majid Sarrafzadeh University of California, Los Angeles
Andrei V. Krassioukov
Andrei V. Krassioukov University of British Columbia
Yu-Chong Tai
Yu-Chong Tai California Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Yury Gerasimenko

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles