World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 44 7159 6594 166 154 177 7705

André Schmidt publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by André Schmidt between 1995 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. André Schmidt published across 31 years, from 1995 to 2025, averaging 6.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2020. 23 of the 193 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2020. 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 0 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 3 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 19 publications 2021: 17 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 18 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 10 publications
1995 2025

193 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
André Schmidt: publications per year, 1995 to 2025
Year Publications
1995 1
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 1
2003 0
2004 0
2005 0
2006 1
2007 0
2008 0
2009 1
2010 3
2011 2
2012 5
2013 17
2014 13
2015 13
2016 16
2017 8
2018 15
2019 10
2020 19
2021 17
2022 10
2023 18
2024 13
2025 10
Total 193
Download as CSV

André Schmidt publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where André Schmidt sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 168–177 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 177 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383 177
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

André Schmidt D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where André Schmidt sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478 44
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

André Schmidt is affiliated with the University of Basel in Switzerland. Their research focuses primarily on the fields of Neuroscience and Medicine, with notable work across key subfields such as Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Molecular Biology.

Their research topics encompass a broad range, including:

  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Schizophrenia Research and Treatment
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Tryptophan and Brain Disorders
  • Gut Microbiota and Health
  • Diet and Metabolism Studies

Some of their recent publications include:

  • "Multimodal Machine Learning Workflows for Prediction of Psychosis in Patients With Clinical High-Risk Syndromes and Recent-Onset Depression" (2020), published in JAMA Psychiatry
  • "Clinical, Gut Microbial and Neural Effects of a Probiotic Add-On Therapy in Depressed Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial" (2022), published in Translational Psychiatry
  • "Association of Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measures With Psychosis Onset in Individuals at Clinical High Risk for Developing Psychosis" (2021), published in JAMA Psychiatry
  • "Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) as an Adjunctive Therapy for Depression-Case Report" (2022), published in Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • "Brain Ageing in Schizophrenia: Evidence from 26 International Cohorts via the ENIGMA Schizophrenia Consortium" (2022), published in Molecular Psychiatry

Frequent co-authors of André Schmidt include:

  • Stefan Borgwardt
  • Christos Pantelis
  • Paolo Brambilla
  • Undine E. Lang
  • Nikolaos Koutsouleris

André Schmidt's work has been featured repeatedly in several prominent academic venues, such as:

  • Schizophrenia Bulletin
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Translational Psychiatry

Best Publications

  • Prediction Models of Functional Outcomes for Individuals in the Clinical High-Risk State for Psychosis or with Recent-Onset Depression: A Multimodal, Multisite Machine Learning Analysis

    Nikolaos Koutsouleris;Lana Kambeitz-Ilankovic;Stephan Ruhrmann;Marlene Rosen

  • Activation of serotonin 2A receptors underlies the psilocybin-induced effects on α oscillations, N170 visual-evoked potentials, and visual hallucinations

    Michael Kometer;André Schmidt;Lutz Jäncke;Franz X. Vollenweider

  • Ventral striatal activation during reward processing in psychosis: A neurofunctional meta-analysis

    Joaquim Radua;André Schmidt;André Schmidt;Stefan Borgwardt;Stefan Borgwardt;Andreas Heinz;Andreas Heinz

  • Psilocybin biases facial recognition, goal-directed behavior, and mood state toward positive relative to negative emotions through different serotonergic subreceptors.

    Michael Kometer;André Schmidt;Rosilla Bachmann;Erich Studerus

  • Clinical, gut microbial and neural effects of a probiotic add-on therapy in depressed patients: a randomized controlled trial

    Unknown

  • The impact of gut hormones on the neural circuit of appetite and satiety: A systematic review

    Davide Zanchi;Antoinette Depoorter;Laura Egloff;Sven Haller

  • Multimodal Machine Learning Workflows for Prediction of Psychosis in Patients With Clinical High-Risk Syndromes and Recent-Onset Depression

    Nikolaos Koutsouleris;Dominic B. Dwyer;Franziska Degenhardt;Franziska Degenhardt;Carlo Maj

  • Altered network hub connectivity after acute LSD administration

    Felix Müller;Patrick C. Dolder;André Schmidt;Matthias E. Liechti

  • BDNF Val66Met polymorphism and hippocampal volume in neuropsychiatric disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Fabienne Harrisberger;R. Smieskova;André Schmidt;C. Lenz

  • Improving Prognostic Accuracy in Subjects at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis: Systematic Review of Predictive Models and Meta-analytical Sequential Testing Simulation

    André Schmidt;Marco Cappucciati;Marco Cappucciati;Joaquim Radua;Joaquim Radua;Grazia Rutigliano;Grazia Rutigliano

  • Increased thalamic resting-state connectivity as a core driver of LSD-induced hallucinations.

    F. Müller;C. Lenz;P. Dolder;U. Lang

  • Brain ageing in schizophrenia: evidence from 26 international cohorts via the ENIGMA Schizophrenia consortium

    Unknown

  • Deconstructing Pretest Risk Enrichment to Optimize Prediction of Psychosis in Individuals at Clinical High Risk.

    Paolo Fusar-Poli;Paolo Fusar-Poli;Grazia Rutigliano;Grazia Rutigliano;Daniel Stahl;André Schmidt

  • Modeling Ketamine Effects on Synaptic Plasticity During the Mismatch Negativity

    André Schmidt;Andreea O. Diaconescu;Michael Kometer;Karl J. Friston

  • Mismatch Negativity Encoding of Prediction Errors Predicts S-ketamine-Induced Cognitive Impairments

    André Schmidt;Rosilla Bachmann;Michael Kometer;Philipp A Csomor

  • Association of Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measures With Psychosis Onset in Individuals at Clinical High Risk for Developing Psychosis: An ENIGMA Working Group Mega-analysis.

    Maria Jalbrzikowski;Rebecca A. Hayes;Stephen J. Wood;Dorte Nordholm

  • The mixed serotonin receptor agonist psilocybin reduces threat-induced modulation of amygdala connectivity

    Rainer Kraehenmann;André Schmidt;Karl Friston;Katrin H. Preller

  • Brain connectivity abnormalities predating the onset of psychosis: correlation with the effect of medication.

    André Schmidt;Renata Smieskova;Renata Smieskova;Jacqueline Aston;Andor Simon;Andor Simon

  • Acute effects of heroin on negative emotional processing: relation of amygdala activity and stress-related responses.

    André Schmidt;André Schmidt;Stefan Borgwardt;Hana Gerber;Gerhard A. Wiesbeck

  • Effects of cannabis on impulsivity: a systematic review of neuroimaging findings.

    Johannes Wrege;Andre Schmidt;Anna Walter;Renata Smieskova

  • Reduced volume of the nucleus accumbens in heroin addiction

    Christian L. Seifert;Stefano Magon;Till Sprenger;Undine E. Lang

  • Approaching a network connectivity-driven classification of the psychosis continuum: a selective review and suggestions for future research

    André Schmidt;Vaibhav A. Diwadkar;Renata Smieskova;Fabienne Harrisberger

Frequent Co-Authors

Stefan Borgwardt
Stefan Borgwardt University of Lübeck
Anita Riecher-Rössler
Anita Riecher-Rössler University of Basel
Paolo Fusar-Poli
Paolo Fusar-Poli King's College London
Philip McGuire
Philip McGuire University of Oxford
Klaas E. Stephan
Klaas E. Stephan University of Zurich
Erich Seifritz
Erich Seifritz University of Zurich
Franz X. Vollenweider
Franz X. Vollenweider University of Zurich
Paolo Brambilla
Paolo Brambilla University of Milan
Joaquim Radua
Joaquim Radua University of Barcelona
Paul Allen
Paul Allen Royal Holloway University of London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in neuroscience opens up a range of related academic and professional options. Many students explore mental health and clinical psychology, with psyd programs usa offering online pathways to doctoral credentials in psychology. These programs are ideal for students aiming for clinical practice, assessment, or therapy roles.

If you are interested in therapy, another option is pursuing an online master's in marriage and family therapy. The best online mft programs allow you to specialize in family systems and counseling, providing flexible and accelerated routes to licensure and practice.

For those who want to enter the workforce quickly, there are accelerated degree programs online that help you complete your bachelor's faster. This can be an efficient way to take your first step in neuroscience-related fields or transition into allied health and science roles.

Lastly, it’s wise to consider your potential earnings. Explore the highest paying bachelor degrees to make informed decisions about your academic investment and long-term career prospects in science, health, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing André Schmidt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles