World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
114
Citations
52669
World Ranking
4699
National Ranking
463

Stephen M. Lawrie publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen M. Lawrie sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 610 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Stephen M. Lawrie D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen M. Lawrie sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 114 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2019 - Fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh

Overview

Stephen M. Lawrie is affiliated with the University of Edinburgh in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple fields within medicine and neuroscience, with significant contributions to cognitive neuroscience and psychiatry.

The key areas of study include:

  • Medicine
  • Neuroscience

Within these broader domains, Lawrie's work particularly focuses on the following subfields:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Psychiatry and Mental Health
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Biological Psychiatry

The main research topics covered in Lawrie's publications involve investigations into brain function and mental disorders, such as:

  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Schizophrenia Research and Treatment
  • Tryptophan and Brain Disorders
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Stress Responses and Cortisol

Recent significant papers authored by Stephen M. Lawrie include:

  • The neuropathology of autism: A systematic review of post-mortem studies of autism and related disorders (2021), Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • Association of Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measures With Psychosis Onset in Individuals at Clinical High Risk for Developing Psychosis (2021), JAMA Psychiatry
  • Dopamine and Glutamate in Antipsychotic-Responsive Compared With Antipsychotic-Nonresponsive Psychosis: A Multicenter Positron Emission Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Study (STRATA) (2020), Schizophrenia Bulletin
  • Structural brain correlates of serum and epigenetic markers of inflammation in major depressive disorder (2020), Brain Behavior and Immunity
  • Blunted medial prefrontal cortico-limbic reward-related effective connectivity and depression (2020), Brain

Frequent publication venues for Lawrie include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Translational Psychiatry
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry
  • Schizophrenia Bulletin
  • Schizophrenia Research

Collaborations have been an important part of Lawrie's academic output. The most frequent co-authors are:

  • Heather C. Whalley
  • Andrew M. McIntosh
  • Xueyi Shen
  • Peter J. Uhlhaas
  • Matthias Schwannauer

In addition to journal articles, Lawrie has contributed to book publications. One notable book published with Cambridge University Press is Mind, State and Society (2021).

Stephen M. Lawrie received recognition as a Fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh in 2019.

Best Publications

  • Psychological autopsy studies of suicide: a systematic review.

    J. T. O. Cavanagh;Alan J. Carson;Michael Sharpe;Stephen M. Lawrie

  • Subcortical brain volume abnormalities in 2028 individuals with schizophrenia and 2540 healthy controls via the ENIGMA consortium

    T. G M van Erp;D. P. Hibar;J. M. Rasmussen;D. C. Glahn

  • Brain abnormality in schizophrenia. A systematic and quantitative review of volumetric magnetic resonance imaging studies.

    Stephen M. Lawrie;Suheib S. Abukmeil

  • Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia: Treatment Response and Resistance in Psychosis (TRRIP) Working Group Consensus Guidelines on Diagnosis and Terminology.

    Oliver D. Howes;Rob McCutcheon;Ofer Agid;Andrea De Bartolomeis

  • Depression after stroke and lesion location: a systematic review

    Alan J Carson;Siobhan MacHale;Kathryn Allen;Stephen M Lawrie

  • Common genetic variants influence human subcortical brain structures.

    Derrek P. Hibar;Jason L. Stein;Jason L. Stein;Miguel E. Renteria;Alejandro Arias-Vasquez

  • Sex Differences in the Adult Human Brain: Evidence from 5216 UK Biobank Participants

    Stuart J Ritchie;Simon R Cox;Xueyi Shen;Michael V Lombardo;Michael V Lombardo

  • The Predictive Coding Account of Psychosis

    Philipp Sterzer;Rick A. Adams;Paul Fletcher;Chris Frith

  • Functional Specialization within Rostral Prefrontal Cortex (Area 10): A Meta-analysis

    Sam J. Gilbert;Stephanie Spengler;Jon S. Simons;J. Douglas Steele

  • The ENIGMA Consortium: large-scale collaborative analyses of neuroimaging and genetic data

    Paul M. Thompson;Jason L. Stein;Sarah E. Medland;Derrek P. Hibar

  • Genomic Dissection of Bipolar Disorder and Schizophrenia, Including 28 Subphenotypes

    Douglas M. Ruderfer;Stephan Ripke;Stephan Ripke;Stephan Ripke;Andrew McQuillin;James Boocock

  • Identification of common variants associated with human hippocampal and intracranial volumes

    Jason L Stein;Sarah E Medland;Sarah E Medland;Alejandro Arias Vasquez;Alejandro Arias Vasquez;Derrek P Hibar

  • Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 19 (NIPS 2006)

    Enrico Simonotto;Heather Whalley;Stephen Lawrie;Lawrence Murray

  • Widespread white matter microstructural differences in schizophrenia across 4322 individuals : results from the ENIGMA Schizophrenia DTI Working Group

    S. Kelly;S. Kelly;N. Jahanshad;A. Zalesky;P. Kochunov

  • Reduced frontotemporal functional connectivity in schizophrenia associated with auditory hallucinations

    Stephen M Lawrie;Christian Buechel;Heather C Whalley;Christopher D Frith

  • Working memory in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis.

    N. F. Forbes;L. A. Carrick;A. M. McIntosh;S. M. Lawrie

  • Towards a neuroanatomy of autism: a systematic review and meta-analysis of structural magnetic resonance imaging studies.

    Andrew C. Stanfield;Andrew M. McIntosh;Michael D. Spencer;Ruth Philip

  • Cannabis as a risk factor for psychosis: systematic review.

    David M. Semple;Andrew M. McIntosh;Stephen M. Lawrie

  • Erratum: Subcortical brain volume abnormalities in 2028 individuals with schizophrenia and 2540 healthy controls via the ENIGMA consortium (Molecular Psychiatry (2015) DOI:10.1038/mp.2015.63)

    T. G.M. Van Erp;D. P. Hibar;J. M. Rasmussen;D. C. Glahn

  • Psychological autopsy studies of suicide: a systematic review. (vol 33, pg 395, 2003)

    A J Carson;M Sharpe;S M Lawrie

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrew M. McIntosh
Andrew M. McIntosh University of Edinburgh
Eve C. Johnstone
Eve C. Johnstone University of Edinburgh
Heather C. Whalley
Heather C. Whalley University of Edinburgh
Jeremy Hall
Jeremy Hall Cardiff University
Mark E. Bastin
Mark E. Bastin University of Edinburgh
Emma Sprooten
Emma Sprooten Radboud University
Ingrid Agartz
Ingrid Agartz University of Oslo
David J. Porteous
David J. Porteous University of Edinburgh
Ian J. Deary
Ian J. Deary University of Edinburgh
Erik G. Jönsson
Erik G. Jönsson University of Oslo

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA doesn’t just mean pursuing an MD. There are many in-demand, flexible healthcare careers that can begin with online degrees. If you’re interested in patient care but want an alternative to medical school, consider the many nursing schools that don't require teas test for admission, making it easier to start your journey as a registered nurse.

For those drawn to leadership or administrative roles, an health administration degree can open doors to managing hospitals, clinics, and health organizations—often available in accelerated, online formats.

Licensed nurses seeking career advancement may explore adn to np bridge programs, which can help you become a Nurse Practitioner with a flexible, online study schedule. Meanwhile, those who are passionate about nutrition, wellness, or public health can consider the best online food science degree options to carve a specialized healthcare niche.

Exploring these alternative health degrees can provide faster, more versatile entry points to rewarding healthcare careers—all while studying online.

Best Scientists Citing Stephen M. Lawrie

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles