World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Annegret H. Thieken

Annegret H. Thieken

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
64
Citations
16368
World Ranking
2303
National Ranking
155

Annegret H. Thieken publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Annegret H. Thieken sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 208 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Annegret H. Thieken D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Annegret H. Thieken sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Annegret H. Thieken is affiliated with the University of Potsdam in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science and social sciences, with a specialization in global and planetary change as well as sociology and political science. The scientist's work covers a range of subjects including flood risk assessment and management, disaster management and resilience, and topics related to climate change impacts and adaptation.

Key topics of their research include:

  • Flood Risk Assessment and Management
  • Disaster Management and Resilience
  • Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research
  • Hydrology and Drought Analysis
  • Climate Change and Health Impacts
  • Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration
  • Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies

Frequent publication venues for their research are:

  • Natural hazards and earth system sciences
  • Journal of Flood Risk Management
  • International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
  • Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change
  • Risk Analysis

Some of the recent papers featuring their contributions include:

  • "Performance of the flood warning system in Germany in July 2021 - insights from affected residents," 2023, Natural hazards and earth system sciences
  • "More than heavy rain turning into fast-flowing water - a landscape perspective on the 2021 Eifel floods," 2022, Natural hazards and earth system sciences
  • "Ranking local climate policy: assessing the mitigation and adaptation activities of 104 German cities," 2021, Climatic Change
  • "The behavioral turn in flood risk management, its assumptions and potential implications," 2020, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Water
  • "Are flood damage models converging to "reality"? Lessons learnt from a blind test," 2020, Natural hazards and earth system sciences

Throughout their career, they have collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Philip Bubeck
  • Paul Hudson
  • Lisa Dillenardt
  • Guilherme Samprogna Mohor
  • Heidi Kreibich

Best Publications

  • Review article "Assessment of economic flood damage"

    B. Merz;H. Kreibich;R. Schwarze;A. Thieken

  • Flood risk assessment and associated uncertainty

    Heiko Apel;Annegret H. Thieken;Bruno Merz;Günter Blöschl

  • Flood risk analyses—how detailed do we need to be?

    Heiko Apel;G. T. Aronica;Heidi Kreibich;A. H. Thieken

  • Estimation uncertainty of direct monetary flood damage to buildings

    B. Merz;H. Kreibich;A. Thieken;R. Schmidtke

  • Flood loss reduction of private households due to building precautionary measures - lessons learned from the Elbe flood in August 2002

    H. Kreibich;A. H. Thieken;Th. Petrow;M. Müller

  • Flood damage and influencing factors: New insights from the August 2002 flood in Germany

    Annegret H. Thieken;Meike Müller;Heidi Kreibich;Bruno Merz

  • Review article: assessing the costs of natural hazards - state of the art and knowledge gaps

    V. Meyer;N. Becker;V. Markantonis;R. Schwarze

  • Flood Risk Mapping At The Local Scale: Concepts and Challenges

    Bruno Merz;A. H. Thieken;M. Gocht

  • Flood-risk mapping: contributions towards an enhanced assessment of extreme events and associated risks

    B. Büchele;H. Kreibich;A. Kron;A. Thieken

  • Coping with floods: preparedness, response and recovery of flood-affected residents in Germany in 2002

    Annegret H. Thieken;Heidi Kreibich;Meike MüLLER;Bruno Merz

  • A Probabilistic Modelling System for Assessing Flood Risks

    Heiko Apel;Annegret H. Thieken;Bruno Merz;Günter Blöschl

  • Is flow velocity a significant parameter in flood damage modelling

    H. Kreibich;K. Piroth;I. Seifert;H. Maiwald

  • Flood risk curves and uncertainty bounds

    Bruno Merz;Annegret H. Thieken

  • Separating natural and epistemic uncertainty in flood frequency analysis

    Bruno Merz;Annegret H. Thieken

  • Insurability and mitigation of flood losses in private households in Germany.

    Annegret H. Thieken;Theresia Petrow;Heidi Kreibich;Bruno Merz

  • Adaptation to flood risk: Results of international paired flood event studies

    Heidi Kreibich;Giuliano Di Baldassarre;Sergiy Vorogushyn;Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts

  • Comparative Risk Assessments for the City of Cologne – Storms, Floods, Earthquakes

    Gottfried Grünthal;Annegret H: Thieken;Jochen Schwarz;Kai Sven Radtke

  • Development of FLEMOcs – a new model for the estimation of flood losses in the commercial sector

    Heidi Kreibich;Isabel Seifert;Bruno Merz;Annegret H. Thieken

  • Recent changes in flood preparedness of private households and businesses in Germany

    Heidi Kreibich;Isabel Seifert;Annegret H. Thieken;Eric Lindquist

  • Insights into Flood-Coping Appraisals of Protection Motivation Theory: Empirical Evidence from Germany and France.

    Philip Bubeck;W. J. Wouter Botzen;W. J. Wouter Botzen;Jonas Laudan;Jeroen C.J.H. Aerts

  • Quantification of uncertainties in flood risk assessments

    Heiko Apel;Bruno Merz;Annegret H. Thieken

Frequent Co-Authors

Heidi Kreibich
Heidi Kreibich Helmholtz Centre Potsdam - GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences
Bruno Merz
Bruno Merz University of Potsdam
Heiko Apel
Heiko Apel University of Potsdam
Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts
Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Laurens M. Bouwer
Laurens M. Bouwer Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht Centre for Materials and Coastal Research
Paolo Ciavola
Paolo Ciavola University of Ferrara
Reinhard Mechler
Reinhard Mechler International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis
Friedemann Wenzel
Friedemann Wenzel Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Oliver Korup
Oliver Korup University of Potsdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences opens doors to various interdisciplinary career paths that address crucial issues like climate change, sustainability, and resource management. Many students complement their environmental studies with skills in geographic data analysis, making programs like the best gis schools highly relevant for those interested in mapping and spatial problem-solving.

For those aiming to influence environmental policy and administration, quick yet comprehensive options such as the mpa one year programs provide an efficient pathway to leadership roles in public administration and environmental governance.

Understanding societal impacts and behavioral dynamics is also critical in addressing environmental challenges. Programs like the best online bachelors in sociology programs help students explore social frameworks that influence sustainability initiatives and community engagement.

For education professionals seeking advancement without the traditional dissertation path, the edd without dissertation programs offer a flexible route to develop expertise in environmental education and leadership roles within academic or organizational settings.

Best Scientists Citing Annegret H. Thieken

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles