World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 52 4597 4400 37 37 234 7586

Sven Fuchs publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Sven Fuchs between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Sven Fuchs published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 11.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 28 publications in 2016. 30 of the 291 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 28. Peak 28 publications in 2016. 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 0 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 22 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 28 publications 2017: 18 publications 2018: 28 publications 2019: 20 publications 2020: 24 publications 2021: 17 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 19 publications
2001 2025

291 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Sven Fuchs: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 1
2002 1
2003 0
2004 3
2005 6
2006 4
2007 3
2008 8
2009 6
2010 8
2011 3
2012 22
2013 15
2014 16
2015 15
2016 28
2017 18
2018 28
2019 20
2020 24
2021 17
2022 12
2023 3
2024 11
2025 19
Total 291
Download as CSV

Sven Fuchs publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sven Fuchs sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 231–240 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 234 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220 234
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Sven Fuchs D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sven Fuchs sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266 52
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Sven Fuchs is affiliated with BOKU University in Austria and primarily conducts research in the field of Environmental Science. Their work extensively covers topics related to flood risk assessment and management, landslides and related hazards, and disaster management and resilience.

The main fields of study for Sven Fuchs include:

  • Environmental Science

Their subfields of study highlight a focus on:

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality

Sven Fuchs' main research topics encompass:

  • Flood Risk Assessment and Management
  • Landslides and related hazards
  • Disaster Management and Resilience
  • Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Cryospheric studies and observations
  • Hydrology and Drought Analysis
  • Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research

Recent publications by Sven Fuchs feature research on physical vulnerability models and indices related to natural hazards, including floods and wildfires. Notable papers include:

  • A generic physical vulnerability model for floods: review and concept for data-scarce regions (2020), published in Natural hazards and earth system sciences
  • A wildfire vulnerability index for buildings (2022), published in Scientific Reports
  • Physical vulnerability to dynamic flooding: Vulnerability curves and vulnerability indices (2022), published in Journal of Hydrology
  • An institutional approach to vulnerability: evidence from natural hazard management in Europe (2021), published in Environmental Research Letters
  • The influence of tailored risk communication on individual adaptive behaviour (2020), published in International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction

Frequent collaborators supporting Sven Fuchs' research include:

  • Margreth Keiler
  • Matthias Schlögl
  • Maria Papathoma-Köhle
  • Thomas Thaler
  • Marie-Sophie Attems

Publications are frequently found in the following venues:

  • Natural hazards and earth system sciences
  • Natural Hazards
  • Scientific Reports
  • International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
  • Land Use Policy

Best Publications

  • Towards an empirical vulnerability function for use in debris flow risk assessment

    S. Fuchs;K. Heiss;J. Hübl

  • Susceptibility versus resilience to mountain hazards in Austria - paradigms of vulnerability revisited

    S. Fuchs

  • Vulnerability assessment in natural hazard and risk analysis: current approaches and future challenges

    Sven Fuchs;Sven Fuchs;Jörn Birkmann;Thomas Glade

  • Editorial for the special issue: vulnerability to natural hazards—the challenge of integration

    Sven Fuchs;Sven Fuchs;Christian Kuhlicke;Christian Kuhlicke;Volker Meyer

  • Matrices, curves and indicators: A review of approaches to assess physical vulnerability to debris flows

    Maria Papathoma-Köhle;Bernhard Gems;Michael Sturm;Sven Fuchs

  • A spatiotemporal multi-hazard exposure assessment based on property data

    Sven Fuchs;Margreth Keiler;Andreas Paul Zischg;Andreas Paul Zischg

  • Mitigating mountain hazards in Austria – legislation, risk transfer, and awareness building

    M. Holub;S. Fuchs

  • A quantitative vulnerability function for fluvial sediment transport

    Reinhold Totschnig;Walter Sedlacek;Sven Fuchs

  • Flood risk perception and adaptation capacity: A contribution to the socio-hydrology debate

    Sven Fuchs;Konstantinos Karagiorgos;Kyriaki Kitikidou;Fotios Maris

  • Natural Hazard Management from a Coevolutionary Perspective: Exposure and Policy Response in the European Alps

    Sven Fuchs;Veronika Röthlisberger;Thomas Thaler;Andreas Paul Zischg

  • Mountain torrents: Quantifying vulnerability and assessing uncertainties.

    Reinhold Totschnig;Sven Fuchs

  • Evaluation of common mixing models for calculating bulk thermal conductivity of sedimentary rocks: Correction charts and new conversion equations

    Sven Fuchs;Felina Schütz;Hans-Jürgen Förster;Andrea Förster

  • Loss estimation for landslides in mountain areas - An integrated toolbox for vulnerability assessment and damage documentation

    M. Papathoma-Köhle;A. Zischg;S. Fuchs;T. Glade

  • Spatiotemporal dynamics: the need for an innovative approach in mountain hazard risk management

    Sven Fuchs;Margreth Keiler;Sergey Sokratov;Alexander Shnyparkov

  • A physical approach on flood risk vulnerability of buildings

    B. Mazzorana;S. Simoni;C. Scherer;B. Gems

  • Implementation of property‐level flood risk adaptation (PLFRA) measures: Choices and decisions

    Marie‐Sophie Attems;Thomas Thaler;Elisabetta Genovese;Sven Fuchs

  • Evaluating cartographic design in flood risk mapping.

    Sven Fuchs;Karl Spachinger;Wolfgang Dorner;Juliette Rochman

  • Vulnerability indicators for natural hazards: an innovative selection and weighting approach.

    Maria Papathoma-Köhle;Matthias Schlögl;Sven Fuchs

  • Calculation of thermal conductivity, thermal diffusivity and specific heat capacity of sedimentary rocks using petrophysical well logs

    Sven Fuchs;Niels Balling;Andrea Förster

  • Avalanche risk assessment – a multi-temporal approach, results from Galtür, Austria

    Margreth Keiler;R. Sailer;P. Jörg;C. Weber

  • Mountain hazards: reducing vulnerability by adapted building design

    Markus Holub;Jürgen Suda;Sven Fuchs;Sven Fuchs

  • Integrated flash flood vulnerability assessment: Insights from East Attica, Greece

    Konstantinos Karagiorgos;Thomas Thaler;Micha Heiser;Johannes Hübl

  • Avalanche Hazard Mitigation Strategies Assessed by Cost Effectiveness Analyses and Cost Benefit Analyses—evidence from Davos, Switzerland

    Sven Fuchs;Magdalena Thöni;Maria Christina McAlpin;Urs Gruber

  • Development of avalanche risk between 1950 and 2000 in the Municipality of Davos, Switzerland

    S. Fuchs;M. Bründl;J. Stötter

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrea Förster
Andrea Förster Helmholtz Centre Potsdam - GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences
Niels Balling
Niels Balling Aarhus University
Thomas Glade
Thomas Glade University of Vienna
Hans-Jürgen Förster
Hans-Jürgen Förster University of Potsdam
Francesco Comiti
Francesco Comiti Free University of Bozen-Bolzano
Robert N. Harris
Robert N. Harris Oregon State University
Lars Henrik Nielsen
Lars Henrik Nielsen Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland
Markus Stoffel
Markus Stoffel University of Geneva
Wolfgang Schöner
Wolfgang Schöner University of Graz
Andreas Gobiet
Andreas Gobiet Central Institution for Meteorology and Geodynamics

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing an online degree in Environmental Sciences opens doors to diverse career pathways in sustainability, conservation, and policy-making. Many students look for flexible and affordable options to advance their education while balancing other commitments. For those interested in leadership roles, exploring the best online eds to edd programs can provide valuable insight into education-focused doctoral degrees that enhance professional qualifications.

Other students may consider specialized fields like social work related to environmental justice. Accessible and affordable options are available through online dsw programs, which blend social sciences with environmental concerns.

For those seeking a broad foundation, programs listed under the most affordable online general studies degree programs offer versatility and cost-effective alternatives to traditional degrees. These can be a stepping stone toward specialized environmental careers or graduate studies.

Additionally, new entrants to the field or career changers might explore the easiest bachelor's degree to get as a starting point, balancing manageable coursework with meaningful outcomes. Ultimately, selecting the right pathway depends on personal goals, time commitment, and desired expertise within environmental sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Sven Fuchs

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles