World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Environmental Sciences
Germany
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
98
Citations
34362
World Ranking
308
National Ranking
19

Dagmar Haase publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dagmar Haase sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 301 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Dagmar Haase D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dagmar Haase sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 98 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Environmental Sciences in Germany Leader Award

Overview

Dagmar Haase is affiliated with Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin in Germany and specializes in Environmental Science with a substantial focus on urban ecological issues. Their body of research encompasses broad topics within environmental science including aspects of urban green space, ecosystem services, and environmental conservation.

Their work spans several subfields, notably Global and Planetary Change, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Environmental Engineering, Plant Science, and Ecology. These areas highlight a multidisciplinary approach to tackling environmental challenges through both natural science and applied methodologies.

Key research topics in Dagmar Haase's portfolio include:

  • Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Urban Green Space and Health
  • Urban Heat Island Mitigation
  • Urban Agriculture and Sustainability
  • Ecology, Conservation, and Geographical Studies
  • Environmental Conservation and Management
  • Remote Sensing in Agriculture

Dagmar Haase has contributed to academic discourse through publication in various scientific venues. Frequent publication platforms for their research are:

  • Urban forestry & urban greening
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Land
  • Ecology and Society
  • The Science of The Total Environment

Their recent notable papers include:

  • Environmental justice in the context of urban green space availability, accessibility, and attractiveness in postsocialist cities (2020), published in Cities
  • Linking the Remote Sensing of Geodiversity and Traits Relevant to Biodiversity-Part II: Geomorphology, Terrain and Surfaces (2020), published in Remote Sensing
  • High-resolution digital mapping of soil organic carbon and soil total nitrogen using DEM derivatives, Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 data based on machine learning algorithms (2020), published in The Science of The Total Environment
  • Remote sensing in urban planning: Contributions towards ecologically sound policies? (2020), published in Landscape and Urban Planning
  • Lawns in Cities: From a Globalised Urban Green Space Phenomenon to Sustainable Nature-Based Solutions (2020), published in Land

Collaboration is a significant aspect of their research, reflected in frequent co-authorship with several researchers including Thilo Wellmann, Manuel Wolff, Sebastian Scheuer, Erik Andersson, and Angela Lausch. These partnerships demonstrate an engagement with a diverse network of scholars contributing across environmental and urban studies.

Best Publications

  • Nature-based solutions to climate change mitigation and adaptation in urban areas: perspectives on indicators, knowledge gaps, barriers, and opportunities for action

    Nadja Kabisch;Niki Frantzeskaki;Stephan Pauleit;Sandra Naumann

  • The science, policy and practice of nature-based solutions : An interdisciplinary perspective

    Carsten Nesshöver;Timo Assmuth;Katherine N. Irvine;Graciela M. Rusch

  • A Quantitative Review of Urban Ecosystem Service Assessments: Concepts, Models, and Implementation

    Dagmar Haase;Neele Larondelle;Erik Andersson;Martina Artmann

  • Urban land teleconnections and sustainability

    Karen C. Seto;Anette Reenberg;Christopher G. Boone;Michail Fragkias

  • Green justice or just green? Provision of urban green spaces in Berlin, Germany

    Nadja Kabisch;Nadja Kabisch;Dagmar Haase;Dagmar Haase

  • Human–environment interactions in urban green spaces — A systematic review of contemporary issues and prospects for future research

    Nadja Kabisch;Nadja Kabisch;Salman Qureshi;Salman Qureshi;Dagmar Haase;Dagmar Haase

  • Advancing Urban Ecology toward a Science of Cities

    Timon McPhearson;Steward T. A. Pickett;Nancy B. Grimm;Jari Niemela

  • Urban green space availability in European cities

    Nadja Kabisch;Nadja Kabisch;Michael Strohbach;Dagmar Haase;Dagmar Haase;Jakub Kronenberg

  • Rural-urban gradient analysis of ecosystem services supply and demand dynamics

    Franziska Kroll;Felix Müller;Dagmar Haase;Dagmar Haase;Nicola Fohrer

  • Greening cities – To be socially inclusive?: About the alleged paradox of society and ecology in cities

    Dagmar Haase;Dagmar Haase;Sigrun Kabisch;Annegret Haase;Erik Andersson

  • Research gaps in knowledge of the impact of urban growth on biodiversity

    Robert I. McDonald;Andressa V. Mansur;Fernando Ascensão;Fernando Ascensão;M’lisa Colbert

  • Ecosystem disservices research: A review of the state of the art with a focus on cities

    Peer von Döhren;Dagmar Haase;Dagmar Haase

  • A multicriteria approach for flood risk mapping exemplified at the Mulde river, Germany

    Volker Meyer;Sebastian Scheuer;Dagmar Haase

  • Loess in Europe—its spatial distribution based on a European Loess Map, scale 1:2,500,000

    D. Haase;J. Fink;G. Haase;R. Ruske

  • Ecosystem properties, potentials and services – The EPPS conceptual framework and an urban application example

    Olaf Bastian;Dagmar Haase;Karsten Grunewald

  • Mapping ecosystem service capacity, flow and demand for landscape and urban planning: a case study in the Barcelona metropolitan region

    Francesc Baró;Ignacio Palomo;Grazia Zulian;Pilar Vizcaino

  • Green spaces of European cities revisited for 1990–2006

    Nadja Kabisch;Nadja Kabisch;Dagmar Haase;Dagmar Haase

  • Synergies, Trade-offs, and Losses of Ecosystem Services in Urban Regions: an Integrated Multiscale Framework Applied to the Leipzig-Halle Region, Germany

    Dagmar Haase;Nina Schwarz;Michael Strohbach;Franziska Kroll

  • The carbon footprint of urban green space—A life cycle approach

    Michael W. Strohbach;Michael W. Strohbach;Eric Arnold;Dagmar Haase;Dagmar Haase

  • Urban ecosystem services assessment along a rural-urban gradient: a cross-analysis of European cities.

    Neele Larondelle;Dagmar Haase

  • Position paper: Environmental decision support systems (EDSS) development - Challenges and best practices

    B. S. McIntosh;J. C. Ascough;M. Twery;J. Chew

Frequent Co-Authors

Nadja Kabisch
Nadja Kabisch Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Erik Andersson
Erik Andersson Karolinska Institute
Stephan Pauleit
Stephan Pauleit Technical University of Munich
Salman Qureshi
Salman Qureshi Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Angela Lausch
Angela Lausch Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Thomas Elmqvist
Thomas Elmqvist Stockholm Resilience Centre
Niki Frantzeskaki
Niki Frantzeskaki Utrecht University
Erik Gómez-Baggethun
Erik Gómez-Baggethun Norwegian University of Life Sciences
Ralf Seppelt
Ralf Seppelt Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Dagmar Haase

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles