World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Raffaele Lafortezza

Raffaele Lafortezza

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
53
Citations
10696
World Ranking
3295
National Ranking
56

Raffaele Lafortezza publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Raffaele Lafortezza sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 179 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Raffaele Lafortezza D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Raffaele Lafortezza sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Raffaele Lafortezza is affiliated with the University of Bari Aldo Moro in Italy. Their research primarily focuses on Environmental Science, with substantial contributions to several subfields including Global and Planetary Change, Environmental Engineering, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Ecology, and Atmospheric Science.

The main topics explored in their work encompass:

  • Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Urban Green Space and Health
  • Urban Heat Island Mitigation
  • Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Remote Sensing in Agriculture
  • Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications

Frequently published venues for Lafortezza include the SSRN Electronic Journal, Ecological Indicators, Urban forestry & urban greening, Remote Sensing, and Environmental Research.

They have co-authored extensively with several researchers, including Vincenzo Giannico, Mario Elia, Giovanni Sanesi, Yongxian Su, and Marina D'Este.

Among recent publications, notable papers include:

  • "The European Union roadmap for implementing nature-based solutions: A review" (2021), published in Environmental Science & Policy
  • "Green spaces, quality of life, and citizen perception in European cities" (2021), published in Environmental Research
  • "The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the use of and attitudes towards urban forests and green spaces: Exploring the instigators of change in Belgium" (2021), published in Urban forestry & urban greening
  • "Association between indoor-outdoor green features and psychological health during the COVID-19 lockdown in Italy: A cross-sectional nationwide study" (2021), published in Urban forestry & urban greening
  • "Are Community Gardening and Horticultural Interventions Beneficial for Psychosocial Well-Being? A Meta-Analysis" (2020), published in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Best Publications

  • Go greener, feel better? The positive effects of biodiversity on the well-being of individuals visiting urban and peri-urban green areas

    Giuseppe Carrus;Massimiliano Scopelliti;Raffaele Lafortezza;Giuseppe Colangelo

  • Benefits and well-being perceived by people visiting green spaces in periods of heat stress.

    Raffaele Lafortezza;Raffaele Lafortezza;Giuseppe Carrus;Giovanni Sanesi;Clive Davies

  • The MIMOSE Approach to Support Sustainable Forest Management Planning at Regional Scale in Mediterranean Contexts

    Matteo Vizzarri;Lorenzo Sallustio;Davide Travaglini;Francesca Bottalico

  • The health benefits of nature-based solutions to urbanization challenges for children and the elderly - A systematic review

    Nadja Kabisch;Matilda van den Bosch;Raffaele Lafortezza

  • Urban forests, ecosystem services, green infrastructure and nature-based solutions: Nexus or evolving metaphors?

    Francisco J. Escobedo;Vincenzo Giannico;Chi Yung Jim;Giovanni Sanesi

  • Nature-based solutions for resilient landscapes and cities.

    Raffaele Lafortezza;Raffaele Lafortezza;Jiquan Chen;Cecil Konijnendijk van den Bosch;Thomas B. Randrup

  • Green Infrastructure as a tool to support spatial planning in European urban regions

    Raffaele Lafortezza;Clive Davies;Giovanni Sanesi;Cecil C. Konijnendijk

  • Recreational ecosystem services in European cities: Sociocultural and geographical contexts matter for park use

    L.K. Fischer;J. Honold;A. Botzat;D. Brinkmeyer

  • Nature-based solutions: Settling the issue of sustainable urbanization.

    Raffaele Lafortezza;Raffaele Lafortezza;Giovanni Sanesi

  • Staying in touch with nature and well-being in different income groups: The experience of urban parks in Bogotá

    M. Scopelliti;G. Carrus;C. Adinolfi;G. Suarez

  • Transitional path to the adoption of nature-based solutions

    Clive Davies;Raffaele Lafortezza;Raffaele Lafortezza

  • Beyond green: Broad support for biodiversity in multicultural European cities

    Leonie K. Fischer;Jasmin Honold;Rozalija Cvejić;Tim Delshammar

  • Urban green infrastructure in Europe: Is greenspace planning and policy compliant?

    Clive Davies;Clive Davies;Raffaele Lafortezza;Raffaele Lafortezza

  • Relations between naturalness and perceived restorativeness of different urban green spaces

    Giuseppe Carrus;Raffaele Lafortezza;Giuseppe Colangelo;Ivana Dentamaro

  • The European Union roadmap for implementing nature-based solutions: A review

    Clive Davies;Clive Davies;Wendy Y. Chen;Giovanni Sanesi;Raffaele Lafortezza;Raffaele Lafortezza

  • Grassland canopy cover and aboveground biomass in Mongolia and Inner Mongolia: Spatiotemporal estimates and controlling factors

    Ranjeet John;Jiquan Chen;Vincenzo Giannico;Vincenzo Giannico;Hogeun Park

  • Nature-based solutions to promote human resilience and wellbeing in cities during increasingly hot summers.

    Angelo Panno;Giuseppe Carrus;Raffaele Lafortezza;Luigi Mariani

  • Urban green infrastructure and urban forests: a case study of the Metropolitan Area of Milan

    Giovanni Sanesi;Giuseppe Colangelo;Raffaele Lafortezza;Enrico Calvo

  • Green spaces, quality of life, and citizen perception in European cities

    Vincenzo Giannico;Giuseppina Spano;Mario Elia;Marina D’Este

  • Integrated forest management to prevent wildfires under mediterranean environments

    Piermaria Corona;Davide Ascoli;Anna Barbati;Giovanni Bovio

  • Comparison of two different approaches for assessing the psychological and social dimensions of green spaces

    Giovanni Sanesi;Raffaele Lafortezza;Mirilia Bonnes;Giuseppe Carrus

  • The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the use of and attitudes towards urban forests and green spaces: Exploring the instigators of change in Belgium

    Nicola da Schio;Amy Phillips;Koos Fransen;Koos Fransen;Manuel Wolff

  • Association between indoor-outdoor green features and psychological health during the COVID-19 lockdown in Italy: A cross-sectional nationwide study.

    Giuseppina Spano;Marina D’Este;Vincenzo Giannico;Mario Elia

Frequent Co-Authors

Jiquan Chen
Jiquan Chen Michigan State University
Anna Barbati
Anna Barbati Tuscia University
Piermaria Corona
Piermaria Corona The Canadian Real Estate Association
Gherardo Chirici
Gherardo Chirici University of Florence
Ranjeet John
Ranjeet John University of South Dakota
Marco Marchetti
Marco Marchetti University of Molise
Zutao Ouyang
Zutao Ouyang Auburn University
Changliang Shao
Changliang Shao Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences
Stephan Pauleit
Stephan Pauleit Technical University of Munich
Dagmar Haase
Dagmar Haase Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution in the USA opens the door to a wide range of interdisciplinary career options. Online degrees provide flexibility for students looking to transition into new fields or advance in their current roles. For example, students from non-science backgrounds might consider speech pathology bridge programs if they are interested in careers that combine scientific knowledge and communication.

Another growing area is healthcare. If you’re considering a shift to nursing, a variety of online bsn programs for non nurses can help you earn a nursing degree quickly and affordably. Beyond nursing degrees, advanced roles such as psychiatric nurse practitioners also offer promising opportunities. Learn more about psychiatric nurse practitioner salary by state to assess earning potential across regions.

Many students also want to know how long to become a nurse practitioner as they plan their career trajectory. Whether your passion lies in environmental science or health-related fields, these online pathways make it easier to reach your goals and adapt in a changing job market.

Best Scientists Citing Raffaele Lafortezza

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles