World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
75
Citations
63732
World Ranking
1856
National Ranking
850

Mark Yandell publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Yandell sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 195 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Mark Yandell D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Yandell sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 75 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark Yandell is affiliated with the University of Utah in the United States. Their research spans significant topics within biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and medicine, with a focus on molecular biology and genetics as primary subfields.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • Medicine

Key subfields of study they contribute to are:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Genetics
  • Epidemiology
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Cancer Research

Major research topics associated with their work include:

  • Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Congenital heart defects research
  • Congenital Heart Disease Studies
  • Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
  • Metabolism and Genetic Disorders
  • Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study

Mark Yandell has coauthored frequently with several scholars, including:

  • Martin Tristani-Firouzi
  • Edgar J. Hernández
  • Barry Moore
  • Carson Holt
  • Erwin Frise

The most frequent venues for their publications are:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Genetics in Medicine Open
  • Molecular Biology and Evolution
  • Genome Medicine
  • The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Among their recent published papers are:

  • The status of the human gene catalogue, 2023, Nature
  • Artificial intelligence enables comprehensive genome interpretation and nomination of candidate diagnoses for rare genetic diseases, 2021, Genome Medicine
  • Elephant Genomes Reveal Accelerated Evolution in Mechanisms Underlying Disease Defenses, 2021, Molecular Biology and Evolution
  • A copy number variant is associated with a spectrum of pigmentation patterns in the rock pigeon (Columba livia), 2020, PLoS Genetics
  • Curses or Cures: A Review of the Numerous Benefits Versus the Biosecurity Concerns of Conotoxin Research, 2020, Biomedicines

This broad range of publications highlights an engagement with genomics, genetic diversity, disease mechanisms, and biosecurity-related research.

Best Publications

  • The Sequence of the Human Genome

    J. Craig Venter;Mark D. Adams;Eugene W. Myers;Peter W. Li

  • The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster

    M. D. Adams;S. E. Celniker;R. A. Holt;C. A. Evans

  • The Genome Sequence of the Malaria Mosquito Anopheles gambiae

    Robert A. Holt;G. Mani Subramanian;Aaron Halpern;Granger G. Sutton

  • Comparative Genomics of the Eukaryotes

    Gerald M. Rubin;Mark D. Yandell;Jennifer R. Wortman;George L. Gabor

  • MAKER2: an annotation pipeline and genome-database management tool for second-generation genome projects.

    Carson Holt;Carson Holt;Mark Yandell

  • MAKER: An easy-to-use annotation pipeline designed for emerging model organism genomes

    Brandi L. Cantarel;Ian F Korf;Sofia M C Robb;Genis Parra

  • The Sequence Ontology: a tool for the unification of genome annotations

    Karen Eilbeck;Suzanna E Lewis;Christopher J Mungall;Mark D Yandell

  • The African coelacanth genome provides insights into tetrapod evolution

    Chris T. Amemiya;Chris T. Amemiya;Jessica Alfoldi;Alison P. Lee;Shaohua Fan

  • Contribution of rare inherited and de novo variants in 2,871 congenital heart disease probands

    Sheng Chih Jin;Jason Homsy;Samir Zaidi;Qiongshi Lu

  • A beginner's guide to eukaryotic genome annotation

    Mark Yandell;Daniel Ence

  • Sequencing of the sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus) genome provides insights into vertebrate evolution

    Jeramiah J. Smith;Shigehiro Kuraku;Carson Holt;Tatjana Sauka-Spengler

  • Transposable Elements Are Major Contributors to the Origin, Diversification, and Regulation of Vertebrate Long Noncoding RNAs

    Aurélie Kapusta;Zev Kronenberg;Vincent J. Lynch;Xiaoyu Zhuo

  • A general approach to single-nucleotide polymorphism discovery

    Gabor T. Marth;Ian F Korf;Mark D. Yandell;Raymond T. Yeh

  • The spotted gar genome illuminates vertebrate evolution and facilitates human-teleost comparisons

    Ingo Braasch;Andrew R Gehrke;Jeramiah J Smith;Kazuhiko Kawasaki

  • Genome Annotation and Curation Using MAKER and MAKER-P

    Michael S. Campbell;Carson Holt;Barry Moore;Mark Yandell

  • Comparative genome and proteome analysis of Anopheles gambiae and Drosophila melanogaster.

    Evgeny M. Zdobnov;Christian Von Mering;Ivica Letunic;David Torrents

  • Decoding the massive genome of loblolly pine using haploid DNA and novel assembly strategies

    David B. Neale;Jill L. Wegrzyn;Kristian A. Stevens;Aleksey V. Zimin

  • Genome of the long-living sacred lotus ( Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn.)

    Ray Ming;Ray Ming;Robert VanBuren;Yanling Liu;Mei Yang

  • The king cobra genome reveals dynamic gene evolution and adaptation in the snake venom system

    Freek J. Vonk;Freek J. Vonk;Freek J. Vonk;Nicholas R. Casewell;Nicholas R. Casewell;Christiaan V. Henkel;Alysha M. Heimberg

  • A Comparison of Whole-Genome Shotgun-Derived Mouse Chromosome 16 and the Human Genome

    Richard J. Mural;Mark D. Adams;Eugene W. Myers;Hamilton O. Smith

Frequent Co-Authors

Lynn B. Jorde
Lynn B. Jorde University of Utah
Chad D. Huff
Chad D. Huff The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Baldomero M. Olivera
Baldomero M. Olivera University of Utah
Steven L. Salzberg
Steven L. Salzberg Johns Hopkins University
Gholson J. Lyon
Gholson J. Lyon Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Chris T. Amemiya
Chris T. Amemiya University of California, Merced
Jinchuan Xing
Jinchuan Xing Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Jennifer R. Wortman
Jennifer R. Wortman Broad Institute
J. Craig Venter
J. Craig Venter J. Craig Venter Institute
Eugene W. Myers
Eugene W. Myers Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring genetics can open doors to diverse roles in healthcare and research, but it's also worth considering related online degrees and career pathways. Many students interested in genetics are drawn to healthcare fields that offer strong job prospects and flexible study options.

For those seeking roles in healthcare support, pursuing a medical coding certification cost is relatively affordable and prepares you for in-demand administrative positions. If nursing is of interest, researching what is the easiest nursing school to get into can help you find accessible programs and start your nursing pathway quickly.

For those looking to advance into leadership, a health administration degree offers a fast track into management. Alternatively, a bachelors in healthcare administration is a popular option that blends healthcare knowledge with organizational skills. Together, these pathways provide multiple options for building a successful career in the broader medical and scientific landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Yandell

Trending Scientists