World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Genetics 59 3187 3015 50 48 136 33894

Robert M. Waterhouse publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Robert M. Waterhouse between 2007 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Robert M. Waterhouse published across 20 years, from 2007 to 2026, averaging 9.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2015. 19 of the 190 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2007 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2015. 2007: 1 publication 2008: 2 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 20 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 20 publications 2021: 20 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 20 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 17 publications 2026: 2 publications
2007 2026

190 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Robert M. Waterhouse: publications per year, 2007 to 2026
Year Publications
2007 1
2008 2
2009 4
2010 7
2011 3
2012 0
2013 3
2014 6
2015 20
2016 16
2017 6
2018 7
2019 14
2020 20
2021 20
2022 9
2023 20
2024 13
2025 17
2026 2
Total 190
Download as CSV

Robert M. Waterhouse publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert M. Waterhouse sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 67 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 45–54 to 703+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 217. Most scientists, 217, have 125–134 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 135–144 publications, is where this scientist sits. 45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45–54 publications 703+

This scientist: 136 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
45–54 6
55–64 10
65–74 35
75–84 84
85–94 102
95–104 151
105–114 175
115–124 203
125–134 217
135–144 205 136
145–154 193
155–164 188
165–174 170
175–184 178
185–194 164
195–204 173
205–214 159
215–224 134
225–234 143
235–244 105
245–254 114
255–264 92
265–274 88
275–284 87
285–294 80
295–304 62
305–314 75
315–324 67
325–334 60
335–344 52
345–354 40
355–364 48
365–374 47
375–384 46
385–394 31
395–404 27
405–414 40
415–424 30
425–434 43
435–444 29
445–454 14
455–464 28
465–474 21
475–484 21
485–494 22
495–504 17
505–514 12
515–524 11
525–534 8
535–544 8
545–554 14
555–564 4
565–574 11
575–584 5
585–594 11
595–604 12
605–614 7
615–624 6
625–634 10
635–644 9
645–654 10
655–664 6
665–674 6
675–684 6
685–694 4
695–702 6
703+ 100
Download as CSV

Robert M. Waterhouse D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert M. Waterhouse sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 160+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 191. Most scientists, 191, have 62–63 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 58–59 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 24
42–43 52
44–45 84
46–47 112
48–49 118
50–51 141
52–53 143
54–55 145
56–57 179
58–59 162 59
60–61 175
62–63 191
64–65 172
66–67 184
68–69 164
70–71 158
72–73 150
74–75 136
76–77 127
78–79 127
80–81 111
82–83 110
84–85 110
86–87 84
88–89 102
90–91 66
92–93 72
94–95 70
96–97 54
98–99 60
100–101 49
102–103 55
104–105 45
106–107 42
108–109 28
110–111 39
112–113 25
114–115 31
116–117 29
118–119 34
120–121 29
122–123 29
124–125 18
126–127 27
128–129 22
130–131 16
132–133 11
134–135 17
136–137 12
138–139 21
140–141 4
142–143 9
144–145 14
146–147 6
148–149 10
150–151 7
152–153 9
154–155 8
156–157 8
158–159 9
160+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Robert M. Waterhouse is affiliated with the Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics in Switzerland. Their research spans multiple disciplines within biological sciences, emphasizing biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, alongside agricultural and biological sciences.

The primary fields of study include:

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences

Within these areas, the scientist has contributed extensively to subfields such as molecular biology, insect science, genetics, ecology, and evolutionary behavior and systematics.

  • Molecular Biology
  • Insect Science
  • Genetics
  • Ecology
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

The research interests cover a variety of topics related to insect biology and genomics, as well as biodiversity and ecological studies. Key topics of work include:

  • Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences
  • Genomics and phylogenetic studies
  • Insect and arachnid ecology and behavior
  • Plant and animal studies
  • Mosquito-borne diseases and control
  • Environmental DNA in biodiversity studies
  • Genetic diversity and population structure

Robert M. Waterhouse has coauthored numerous publications with frequent collaborators including Maarten Reijnders, Panagiotis Ioannidis, Hugh M. Robertson, Joshua B. Benoit, and Evgeny M. Zdobnov.

The scientist's work has appeared predominantly in several key venues known for biological and genomic research. The most frequent publication venues are:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • BMC Biology
  • F1000Research
  • Faculty of 1000 Research Ltd
  • Molecular Biology and Evolution

Among recent papers by Robert M. Waterhouse are:

  • How genomics can help biodiversity conservation, 2023, Trends in Genetics
  • Gene content evolution in the arthropods, 2020, Genome Biology
  • Enhanced genome assembly and a new official gene set for Tribolium castaneum, 2020, BMC Genomics
  • Summary Visualizations of Gene Ontology Terms With GO-Figure!, 2021, Frontiers in Bioinformatics
  • Genus-Wide Characterization of Bumblebee Genomes Provides Insights into Their Evolution and Variation in Ecological and Behavioral Traits, 2020, Molecular Biology and Evolution

Best Publications

  • BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs

    Felipe A. Simão;Robert M. Waterhouse;Panagiotis Ioannidis;Evgenia V. Kriventseva

  • BUSCO Applications from Quality Assessments to Gene Prediction and Phylogenomics.

    Robert M Waterhouse;Mathieu Seppey;Felipe A Simão;Mosè Manni

  • The genome of the model beetle and pest Tribolium castaneum.

    Stephen Richards;Richard A. Gibbs;George M. Weinstock;Susan J. Brown

  • Functional and evolutionary insights from the genomes of three parasitoid Nasonia species.

    John H. Werren;Stephen Richards;Christopher A. Desjardins;Oliver Niehuis

  • Evolutionary Dynamics of Immune-Related Genes and Pathways in Disease-Vector Mosquitoes

    Robert M. Waterhouse;Evgenia V. Kriventseva;Stephan Meister;Zhiyong Xi

  • Extensive introgression in a malaria vector species complex revealed by phylogenomics

    Michael C. Fontaine;James B. Pease;Aaron Steele;Robert M. Waterhouse

  • Genome sequences of the human body louse and its primary endosymbiont provide insights into the permanent parasitic lifestyle

    Ewen F. Kirkness;Brian J. Haas;Brian J. Haas;Weilin Sun;Henk R. Braig

  • Highly evolvable malaria vectors: The genomes of 16 Anopheles mosquitoes

    Daniel E. Neafsey;Robert M. Waterhouse;Mohammad R. Abai;Sergey S. Aganezov

  • Sequencing of Culex quinquefasciatus Establishes a Platform for Mosquito Comparative Genomics

    Peter Arensburger;Karine Megy;Robert M Waterhouse;Robert M Waterhouse;Jenica Abrudan

  • Genomic insights into the Ixodes scapularis tick vector of Lyme disease

    Monika Gulia-Nuss;Monika Gulia-Nuss;Andrew B. Nuss;Andrew B. Nuss;Jason M. Meyer;Jason M. Meyer;Daniel E. Sonenshine

  • Finding the missing honey bee genes: Lessons learned from a genome upgrade

    Christine G Elsik;Christine G Elsik;Kim C Worley;Anna K Bennett;Martin Beye

  • OrthoDB v9.1: cataloging evolutionary and functional annotations for animal, fungal, plant, archaeal, bacterial and viral orthologs

    Evgeny M. Zdobnov;Fredrik Tegenfeldt;Dmitry Kuznetsov;Robert M. Waterhouse

  • Genomic signatures of evolutionary transitions from solitary to group living

    Karen M. Kapheim;Karen M. Kapheim;Hailin Pan;Cai Li;Steven L. Salzberg;Steven L. Salzberg

  • OrthoDB: a hierarchical catalog of animal, fungal and bacterial orthologs

    Robert M. Waterhouse;Fredrik Tegenfeldt;Jia Li;Evgeny M. Zdobnov

  • The genomes of two key bumblebee species with primitive eusocial organization

    Ben M Sadd;Ben M Sadd;Seth M Barribeau;Seth M Barribeau;Guy Bloch;Dirk C. de Graaf

  • Phylogenomics and the evolution of hemipteroid insects.

    Kevin P. Johnson;Christopher H. Dietrich;Frank Friedrich;Rolf G. Beutel

  • Cellodextrin Transport in Yeast for Improved Biofuel Production

    Jonathan M. Galazka;Chaoguang Tian;Chaoguang Tian;William T. Beeson;Bruno Martinez

  • Genome of Rhodnius prolixus, an insect vector of Chagas disease, reveals unique adaptations to hematophagy and parasite infection

    Rafael D. Mesquita;Raquel J. Vionette-Amaral;Carl Lowenberger;Rolando Rivera-Pomar

  • OrthoDB v8: update of the hierarchical catalog of orthologs and the underlying free software

    Evgenia V. Kriventseva;Evgenia V. Kriventseva;Fredrik Tegenfeldt;Fredrik Tegenfeldt;Tom J. Petty;Tom J. Petty;Robert M. Waterhouse;Robert M. Waterhouse

  • Highly evolvable malaria vectors: The genomes of 16 Anopheles mosquitoes

    Robert Waterhouse;Clara Sophia Chan;Irwin Jungreis;Eva Maria Novoa Pardo

Frequent Co-Authors

Evgeny M. Zdobnov
Evgeny M. Zdobnov Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics
Hugh M. Robertson
Hugh M. Robertson University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Stephen Richards
Stephen Richards South Australian Museum
Donna M. Muzny
Donna M. Muzny Baylor College of Medicine
Kim C. Worley
Kim C. Worley Baylor College of Medicine
Richard A. Gibbs
Richard A. Gibbs Baylor College of Medicine
John H. Werren
John H. Werren University of Rochester
Erich Bornberg-Bauer
Erich Bornberg-Bauer University of Münster
Matthew T. Weirauch
Matthew T. Weirauch Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying genetics in the USA opens doors to a range of in-demand online degrees and diverse career pathways in healthcare and research. For those considering different roles within the medical field, nursing stands out as one of the most versatile options. Many prospective students look for a nursing program that doesn't require teas to simplify the admissions process and get started sooner.

For individuals aiming to advance into healthcare administration, evaluating mha degree cost is important, as affordability and flexibility are key to balancing work and study. Additionally, aspiring nurses interested in entering the workforce quickly may explore fast track lpn pathways, which offer accelerated options with online components.

For those looking to move into academia or advanced research after a genetics degree, pursuing one of the online nursing phd programs is a practical next step. Each of these online degree options complements a background in genetics, helping students broaden their expertise and adapt to the rapidly evolving healthcare landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Robert M. Waterhouse

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles