World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
41
Citations
8577
World Ranking
5737
National Ranking
300

Angela Lausch publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Angela Lausch sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 113 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Angela Lausch D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Angela Lausch sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Angela Lausch is affiliated with the Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research in Germany, where their work primarily addresses various aspects of environmental science. Their research encompasses multiple fields, with significant contributions in global and planetary change, environmental engineering, ecology, artificial intelligence, as well as health, toxicology, and mutagenesis.

The scientist's main research topics include land use and ecosystem services, remote sensing in agriculture, geochemistry and geologic mapping, urban green space and health, soil geostatistics and mapping, urban heat island mitigation, and applications of remote sensing and LiDAR technology.

Among the recent papers authored or co-authored by Angela Lausch are:

  • Linking the Remote Sensing of Geodiversity and Traits Relevant to Biodiversity-Part II: Geomorphology, Terrain and Surfaces, 2020, Remote Sensing
  • Priority list of biodiversity metrics to observe from space, 2021, Nature Ecology & Evolution
  • High-resolution digital mapping of soil organic carbon and soil total nitrogen using DEM derivatives, Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 data based on machine learning algorithms, 2020, The Science of The Total Environment
  • Remote sensing in urban planning: Contributions towards ecologically sound policies?, 2020, Landscape and Urban Planning
  • Prediction of soil organic carbon and the C:N ratio on a national scale using machine learning and satellite data: A comparison between Sentinel-2, Sentinel-3 and Landsat-8 images, 2020, The Science of The Total Environment

Frequent publication venues where Angela Lausch has contributed include:

  • Remote Sensing
  • Nature Ecology & Evolution
  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Ecological Indicators
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences

Collaborations form a notable part of Angela Lausch's work. Frequent co-authors include Dagmar Haase, Jan Bumberger, Thilo Wellmann, Peter Selsam, and Tao Zhou, with multiple joint publications reflecting collaborative research efforts.

Best Publications

  • Indicators for biodiversity in agricultural landscapes: a pan‐European study

    R. Billeter;J. Liira;D. Bailey;R.J.F. Bugter

  • Applicability of landscape metrics for the monitoring of landscape change: issues of scale, resolution and interpretability

    A Lausch

  • Understanding and quantifying landscape structure – A review on relevant process characteristics, data models and landscape metrics

    Angela Lausch;Thomas Blaschke;Dagmar Haase;Felix Herzog

  • Analysis of historic changes in regional ecosystem service provisioning using land use data

    Sven Lautenbach;Carolin Kugel;Angela Lausch;Ralf Seppelt

  • Native and alien plant species richness in relation to spatial heterogeneity on a regional scale in Germany

    Kirstin Deutschewitz;Kirstin Deutschewitz;Angela Lausch;Ingolf Kuhn;Stefan Klotz

  • Framing the concept of satellite remote sensing essential biodiversity variables: challenges and future directions

    Nathalie Pettorelli;Martin Wegmann;Martin Wegmann;Andrew Skidmore;Sander Mucher

  • Landscape metrics for assessment of landscape destruction and rehabilitation.

    Felix Herzog;Angela Lausch;Eckhard Müller;Hans-Hermann Thulke

  • Linking the Remote Sensing of Geodiversity and Traits Relevant to Biodiversity—Part II: Geomorphology, Terrain and Surfaces

    Angela Lausch;Angela Lausch;Michael E. Schaepman;Andrew K. Skidmore;Sina C. Truckenbrodt

  • Priority list of biodiversity metrics to observe from space.

    Andrew K. Skidmore;Andrew K. Skidmore;Nicholas C. Coops;Elnaz Neinavaz;Abebe Ali

  • Remote sensing in urban planning: Contributions towards ecologically sound policies?

    Thilo Wellmann;Thilo Wellmann;Angela Lausch;Angela Lausch;Erik Andersson;Erik Andersson;Sonja Knapp

  • Understanding Forest Health with Remote Sensing -Part I—A Review of Spectral Traits, Processes and Remote-Sensing Characteristics

    Angela Lausch;Stefan Erasmi;Douglas J. King;Paul Magdon

  • Linking earth observation and taxonomic, structural and functional biodiversity: local to ecosystem perspectives

    Angela Lausch;L Bannehr;Michael Beckmann;Christoph Boehm

  • Satellite remote sensing to monitor species diversity: potential and pitfalls

    Duccio Rocchini;Doreen S. Boyd;Jean‐Baptiste Féret;Giles M. Foody

  • Understanding Forest Health with Remote Sensing-Part II—A Review of Approaches and Data Models

    Angela Lausch;Stefan Erasmi;Douglas J. King;Paul Magdon

  • Data mining and linked open data – New perspectives for data analysis in environmental research

    Angela Lausch;Andreas Schmidt;Lutz Tischendorf

  • Supplementing land-use statistics with landscape metrics: some methodological considerations.

    F Herzog;A Lausch

  • Forecasting potential bark beetle outbreaks based on spruce forest vitality using hyperspectral remote-sensing techniques at different scales

    A. Lausch;M. Heurich;D. Gordalla;H.-J. Dobner

  • Factors affecting the spatio-temporal dispersion of Ips typographus (L.) in Bavarian Forest National Park: A long-term quantitative landscape-level analysis

    Angela Lausch;Lorenz Fahse;Marco Heurich

  • The Bode hydrological observatory: a platform for integrated, interdisciplinary hydro-ecological research within the TERENO Harz/Central German Lowland Observatory

    Ute Wollschläger;Sabine Attinger;Dietrich Borchardt;Mario Brauns

  • Measuring β-diversity by remote sensing: A challenge for biodiversity monitoring

    Duccio Rocchini;Duccio Rocchini;Sandra Luque;Nathalie Pettorelli;Lucy Bastin

  • Prediction uncertainty of environmental change effects on temperate European biodiversity.

    Carsten F. Dormann;Oliver Schweiger;P. Arens;I. Augenstein

Frequent Co-Authors

Dagmar Haase
Dagmar Haase Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Marco Heurich
Marco Heurich University of Freiburg
Peter Dietrich
Peter Dietrich University of Tübingen
Duccio Rocchini
Duccio Rocchini University of Bologna
Andrew K. Skidmore
Andrew K. Skidmore University of Twente
Martin Wegmann
Martin Wegmann University of Würzburg
Michael E. Schaepman
Michael E. Schaepman University of Zurich
Sebastian Schmidtlein
Sebastian Schmidtlein Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Ralf Seppelt
Ralf Seppelt Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Felix Herzog
Felix Herzog Agroscope

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re drawn to Ecology and Evolution, you might also consider other online pathways in science, healthcare, and allied professions. Flexible online degrees allow those with different backgrounds to quickly pivot into new fields. For example, speech language pathology bridge programs online offer a route for non-SLP majors to become qualified speech-language pathologists.

Healthcare careers are also accessible via accelerated online options. If you have a bachelor’s degree in another area, you can explore accelerated nursing programs for non nurses, which let you quickly qualify as a registered nurse. From there, you might pursue an advanced nursing career—learn more about dnp psychiatric nurse practitioner salary to compare earnings potential by state.

Many are curious about how many years does it take to be a nurse practitioner, since online programs can significantly shorten the timeline compared to traditional degrees. These alternatives provide flexible, affordable ways to build a rewarding career in related scientific or health professions.

Best Scientists Citing Angela Lausch

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles