World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Peter Dietrich publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Dietrich sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Peter Dietrich D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Dietrich sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter Dietrich is affiliated with the University of Tübingen in Germany. Their research primarily spans the fields of Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences, with considerable work published in subfields such as Environmental Engineering, Atmospheric Science, Geophysics, Ecology, and Global and Planetary Change.

Their research focuses on several main topics, including groundwater flow and contamination studies, geophysical and geoelectrical methods, soil moisture and remote sensing, hydrology and watershed management studies, geophysical methods and applications, remote sensing in agriculture, and geology and paleoclimatology research.

Peter Dietrich has contributed to numerous publications, with frequent appearances in these venues:

  • Remote Sensing
  • The Journal of Urology
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Environmental Earth Sciences
  • Journal of Hepatology

They have collaborated extensively with several coauthors, notably:

  • Ulrike Werban
  • Uta Koedel
  • Martin Schrön
  • Erik Borg
  • Sabine Attinger

Significant recent papers authored by or involving Peter Dietrich include:

  • "Footprint characteristics revised for field-scale soil moisture monitoring with cosmic-ray neutrons", 2024, heiDOK (Heidelberg University)
  • "Linking the Remote Sensing of Geodiversity and Traits Relevant to Biodiversity-Part II: Geomorphology, Terrain and Surfaces", 2020, Remote Sensing
  • "Neutrons on Rails: Transregional Monitoring of Soil Moisture and Snow Water Equivalent", 2021, Geophysical Research Letters
  • "Citizen science's transformative impact on science, citizen empowerment and socio-political processes", 2023, Socio-Ecological Practice Research
  • "Groundwater nitrification and denitrification are not always strictly aerobic and anaerobic processes, respectively: an assessment of dual-nitrate isotopic and chemical evidence in a stratified alluvial aquifer", 2020, Biogeochemistry

Best Publications

  • A Network of Terrestrial Environmental Observatories in Germany

    Steffen Zacharias;Heye Bogena;Luis Samaniego;Matthias Mauder

  • Footprint characteristics revised for field‐scale soil moisture monitoring with cosmic‐ray neutrons

    M. Köhli;M. Schrön;M. Zreda;U. Schmidt

  • Flow and Transport in Fractured Porous Media

    Peter Dietrich;Rainer Helmig;Martin Sauter;Heinz Hötzl

  • Linking the Remote Sensing of Geodiversity and Traits Relevant to Biodiversity—Part II: Geomorphology, Terrain and Surfaces

    Angela Lausch;Angela Lausch;Michael E. Schaepman;Andrew K. Skidmore;Sina C. Truckenbrodt

  • Identification of the permeability distribution in soil by hydraulic tomography

    J Gottlieb;P Dietrich

  • A travel time based hydraulic tomographic approach

    R. Brauchler;R. Liedl;P. Dietrich

  • Impacts of the use of the geological subsurface for energy storage: an investigation concept

    Sebastian Bauer;Christof Beyer;Frank Dethlefsen;Peter Dietrich

  • Improving calibration and validation of cosmic-ray neutron sensors in the light of spatial sensitivity

    Martin Schrön;Markus Köhli;Markus Köhli;Markus Köhli;Lena Scheiffele;Joost Iwema

  • Delineation of subsurface hydrocarbon contamination at a former hydrogenation plant using spectral induced polarization imaging

    Adrián Flores Orozco;Andreas Kemna;Christoph Oberdörster;Ludwig Zschornack

  • Direct Push-Technologies

    Peter Dietrich;Carsten Leven

  • The Bode hydrological observatory: a platform for integrated, interdisciplinary hydro-ecological research within the TERENO Harz/Central German Lowland Observatory

    Ute Wollschläger;Sabine Attinger;Dietrich Borchardt;Mario Brauns

  • A rapid method for hydraulic profiling in unconsolidated formations.

    Peter Dietrich;James J. Jr.. Butler;Klaus Faiß

  • Mitigating uranium in groundwater: prospects and limitations.

    C Noubactep;G Meinrath;P Dietrich;B Merkel

  • Investigation of the geochemical impact of CO2 on shallow groundwater: design and implementation of a CO2 injection test in Northeast Germany

    Anita Peter;Hendrik Lamert;Matthias Beyer;Götz Hornbruch

  • In Situ/Remote Sensing Integration to Assess Forest Health—A Review

    Marion Pause;Christian Schweitzer;Michael Rosenthal;Vanessa Keuck

  • Field evaluation of methods for determining hydraulic conductivity from grain size data

    Thomas Vienken;Peter Dietrich

  • Energy storage in the geological subsurface: dimensioning, risk analysis and spatial planning: the ANGUS+ project

    Alina Kabuth;Andreas Dahmke;Christof Beyer;Lars Bilke

  • Characterizing hydraulic conductivity with the direct-push permeameter.

    James J. Butler;Peter Dietrich;Volker Wittig;Tom Christy

  • HESS Opinions: From response units to functional units: a thermodynamic reinterpretation of the HRU concept to link spatial organization and functioning of intermediate scale catchments

    E. Zehe;U. Ehret;L. Pfister;T. Blume

  • Testing the Suitability of Zerovalent Iron Materials for Reactive Walls

    Chicgoua Noubactep;Günther Meinrath;Peter Dietrich;Martin Sauter

  • Influence of natural time-dependent variations of electrical conductivity on DC resistivity measurements

    Arno Rein;Ruth Hoffmann;Peter Dietrich

  • Cosmic-ray Neutron Rover Surveys of Field Soil Moisture and the Influence of Roads

    Martin Schrön;Martin Schrön;Rafael Rosolem;Markus Köhli;Markus Köhli;Markus Köhli;L. Piussi

Frequent Co-Authors

Georg Teutsch
Georg Teutsch Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Olaf Kolditz
Olaf Kolditz TU Dresden
Sabine Attinger
Sabine Attinger Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Rudolf Liedl
Rudolf Liedl TU Dresden
Martin Sauter
Martin Sauter University of Göttingen
Angela Lausch
Angela Lausch Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Yoram Rubin
Yoram Rubin University of California, Berkeley
Thorsten Behrens
Thorsten Behrens University of Tübingen
Karsten Schmidt
Karsten Schmidt University of Tübingen
Heye Bogena
Heye Bogena Forschungszentrum Jülich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Earth Science in the USA opens diverse educational and career opportunities. For students considering interdisciplinary skills, online degrees in Spanish offer a unique advantage. Mastering a second language can enhance communication skills vital for fieldwork and research collaborations, making this path both practical and enriching. Programs like online degrees in Spanish provide affordable and flexible options to boost language proficiency alongside scientific expertise.

Veterans interested in Earth Science will find that veteran friendly online Spanish degree programs can support them in transitioning to academic and professional environments smoothly. These programs recognize military experience and offer tailored support, which can be crucial for success in demanding studies and future careers.

Additionally, advanced degrees such as a Master of Fine Arts or a Master’s in Human Resource Management might seem unrelated but can complement Earth Science careers in areas like environmental education, science communication, and organizational leadership. For those looking to blend creativity with science, consider exploring the master of fine arts online programs. For leadership roles, the best online master degree in human resource management offers tools for managing teams and projects effectively.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Dietrich

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles