World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Chicgoua Noubactep

Chicgoua Noubactep

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
47
Citations
7986
World Ranking
5813
National Ranking
389

Chicgoua Noubactep publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chicgoua Noubactep sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 192 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Chicgoua Noubactep D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chicgoua Noubactep sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Chicgoua Noubactep is affiliated with the University of Göttingen in Germany and has made contributions primarily in the fields of Environmental Science and Engineering. Their research spans a range of topics focused on water treatment, environmental remediation, and associated technologies.

The scientist's main areas of study include:

  • Environmental Science
  • Engineering

Within these fields, they have specialized in several subfields such as:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Water Science and Technology
  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

The core topics of Chicgoua Noubactep's work reflect an emphasis on water-related environmental challenges and mitigation techniques:

  • Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
  • Arsenic contamination and mitigation
  • Advanced oxidation water treatment
  • Water Treatment and Disinfection
  • Child Nutrition and Water Access
  • Water Governance and Infrastructure
  • Wastewater Treatment and Reuse

Their recent scholarly contributions include these publications:

  • Integrated Water Resource Management: Rethinking the Contribution of Rainwater Harvesting, 2021, Sustainability
  • Metallic iron (Fe0)-based materials for aqueous phosphate removal: A critical review, 2022, Journal of Environmental Management
  • The pit latrine paradox in low-income settings: A sanitation technology of choice or a pollution hotspot?, 2023, The Science of The Total Environment
  • Designing the Next Generation of Fe0-Based Filters for Decentralized Safe Drinking Water Treatment: A Conceptual Framework, 2020, Processes
  • Metallic Iron for Environmental Remediation: Starting an Overdue Progress in Knowledge, 2020, Water

Chicgoua Noubactep frequently publishes in these venues:

  • Water
  • Processes
  • Scientific Reports
  • Chemosphere
  • Applied Water Science

The scientist collaborates regularly with several co-authors including:

  • Willis Gwenzi
  • Rui Hu
  • Arnaud Igor Ndé-Tchoupé
  • Viet Cao
  • Xuesong Cui

Best Publications

  • Biochar-based water treatment systems as a potential low-cost and sustainable technology for clean water provision.

    Willis Gwenzi;Nhamo Chaukura;Chicgoua Noubactep;Fungai N.D. Mukome

  • A CRITICAL REVIEW ON THE PROCESS OF CONTAMINANT REMOVAL IN FE0–H2O SYSTEMS

    C. Noubactep

  • Nanoscale Metallic Iron for Environmental Remediation: Prospects and Limitations

    Chicgoua Noubactep;Sabine Caré;Richard Crane

  • A multi-method approach to study the stability of natural slopes and landslide susceptibility mapping

    M. Fall;R. Azzam;C. Noubactep

  • The fundamental mechanism of aqueous contaminant removal by metallic iron

    C Noubactep

  • Mechanism of uranium removal from the aqueous solution by elemental iron

    Chicgoua Noubactep;A. Schöner;G. Meinrath

  • Adsorption of methylene blue from an aqueous solution on to activated carbons from palm-tree cobs

    J. Avom;J.Ketcha Mbadcam;C. Noubactep;P. Germain

  • Metallic iron for environmental remediation: A review of reviews.

    Chicgoua Noubactep

  • Processes of Contaminant Removal in Fe0-H2O Systems Revisited: The Importance of Co-Precipitation

    Chicgoua Noubactep

  • An analysis of the evolution of reactive species in Fe0/H2O systems.

    C. Noubactep

  • Nano-scale metallic iron for the treatment of solutions containing multiple inorganic contaminants.

    Thomas Bligh Scott;IC Popescu;Richard Crane;Chicgoua Noubactep

  • Metallic Iron Filters for Universal Access to Safe Drinking Water

    Chicgoua Noubactep;Angelika Schöner;Paul Woafo

  • Mitigating uranium in groundwater: prospects and limitations.

    C Noubactep;G Meinrath;P Dietrich;B Merkel

  • Polyaniline/Fe0 composite nanofibers: An excellent adsorbent for the removal of arsenic from aqueous solutions

    Madhumita Bhaumik;Chicgoua Noubactep;Vinod Kumar Gupta;Rob I. McCrindle

  • Modeling the Permeability Loss of Metallic Iron Water Filtration Systems

    Sabine Caré;Richard Crane;Paolo S. Calabrò;Antoine Ghauch

  • Testing the Suitability of Zerovalent Iron Materials for Reactive Walls

    Chicgoua Noubactep;Günther Meinrath;Peter Dietrich;Martin Sauter

  • Metallic iron for safe drinking water worldwide

    C. Noubactep

  • Discussing porosity loss of Fe0 packed water filters at ground level

    Richard Domga;Fulbert Togue-Kamga;Chicgoua Noubactep;Jean-Bosco Tchatchueng;Jean-Bosco Tchatchueng

  • Metallic iron for safe drinking water provision: Considering a lost knowledge

    Hezron T. Mwakabona;Arnaud Igor Ndé-Tchoupé;Karoli N. Njau;Chicgoua Noubactep

  • Dimensioning metallic iron beds for efficient contaminant removal.

    Chicgoua Noubactep;Sabine Caré

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin Sauter
Martin Sauter University of Göttingen
Paul Woafo
Paul Woafo Université de Yaoundé I
Peter Dietrich
Peter Dietrich University of Tübingen
Mamadou Fall
Mamadou Fall University of Ottawa
Arjun Maity
Arjun Maity Council for Scientific and Industrial Research
Vinod Kumar Gupta
Vinod Kumar Gupta King Abdulaziz University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences opens doors to diverse career paths, but choosing the right program is crucial. For those interested in advancing education roles within environmental advocacy or policy, exploring eds to edd programs can provide the leadership skills needed for impactful work.

Similarly, individuals aiming to combine social work and environmental sustainability may find value in fully funded dsw programs, which offer a financially accessible path to doctoral-level expertise in social work with an environmental focus.

For students weighing affordability, exploring the most affordable online general studies degree programs helps identify cost-effective options that maintain academic quality while providing flexibility for environmental studies.

Those new to higher education or looking for less intensive entry points often wonder about the what's the easiest bachelor's degree to get. While ease varies by individual interest and commitment, choosing an approachable major related to Environmental Sciences can build a strong foundation for future specialization.

Best Scientists Citing Chicgoua Noubactep

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles