World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Chicgoua Noubactep

Chicgoua Noubactep

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 47 5815 5576 389 380 192 7986

Chicgoua Noubactep publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Chicgoua Noubactep between 1997 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Chicgoua Noubactep published across 30 years, from 1997 to 2026, averaging 6.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2009. 4 of the 197 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2009. 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 1 publication 2004: 0 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 21 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 3 publications 2026: 1 publication
1997 2026

197 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Chicgoua Noubactep: publications per year, 1997 to 2026
Year Publications
1997 1
1998 0
1999 0
2000 1
2001 1
2002 1
2003 1
2004 0
2005 5
2006 7
2007 4
2008 9
2009 21
2010 15
2011 8
2012 11
2013 11
2014 5
2015 10
2016 6
2017 7
2018 8
2019 11
2020 10
2021 15
2022 11
2023 9
2024 5
2025 3
2026 1
Total 197
Download as CSV

Chicgoua Noubactep publications per year - data summary

  • Chicgoua Noubactep, a Environmental Sciences scholar from University of Göttingen, has 197 publications recorded across 30 years, from 1997 to 2026.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1997 and the most recent to 2026.
  • The most productive year is 2009, with 21 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1997, 2000, 2001, 2002 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 3 of the 30 years in the span carry no publications at all (1998, 1999 and 2004).
  • The rate of publication averages 6.6 papers per year over the whole span, or 7.3 per year counting only the 27 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2022-2026) hold 29 publications, 15% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1997-2006: 17 publications (1.7 per year); 2007-2016: 100 publications (10.0 per year); 2017-2026: 80 publications (8.0 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Chicgoua Noubactep publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chicgoua Noubactep sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 191–200 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 192 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377 192
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Chicgoua Noubactep publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 9,676 Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 66 ranges running from 41–50 to 690+ publications.
  • Chicgoua Noubactep, a Environmental Sciences scholar from University of Göttingen, records 192 publications - the 61st percentile of the discipline.
  • 61% of ranked Environmental Sciences scientists score the same or lower than Chicgoua Noubactep, and about 39% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 161–170 publications range, and Chicgoua Noubactep ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 121–130 publications, holding 617 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 67% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 690 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Chicgoua Noubactep D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chicgoua Noubactep sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275 47
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Chicgoua Noubactep D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 9,676 Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 97 ranges running from 30 to 126+ D-Index.
  • Chicgoua Noubactep, a Environmental Sciences scholar from University of Göttingen, records 47 D-Index - the 42nd percentile of the discipline.
  • 42% of ranked Environmental Sciences scientists score the same or lower than Chicgoua Noubactep, and about 58% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 51 D-Index range, and Chicgoua Noubactep ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 45 D-Index, holding 348 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 59% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 54 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more, 92 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Chicgoua Noubactep is affiliated with the University of Göttingen in Germany and has made contributions primarily in the fields of Environmental Science and Engineering. Their research spans a range of topics focused on water treatment, environmental remediation, and associated technologies.

The scientist's main areas of study include:

  • Environmental Science
  • Engineering

Within these fields, they have specialized in several subfields such as:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Water Science and Technology
  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

The core topics of Chicgoua Noubactep's work reflect an emphasis on water-related environmental challenges and mitigation techniques:

  • Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
  • Arsenic contamination and mitigation
  • Advanced oxidation water treatment
  • Water Treatment and Disinfection
  • Child Nutrition and Water Access
  • Water Governance and Infrastructure
  • Wastewater Treatment and Reuse

Their recent scholarly contributions include these publications:

  • Integrated Water Resource Management: Rethinking the Contribution of Rainwater Harvesting, 2021, Sustainability
  • Metallic iron (Fe0)-based materials for aqueous phosphate removal: A critical review, 2022, Journal of Environmental Management
  • The pit latrine paradox in low-income settings: A sanitation technology of choice or a pollution hotspot?, 2023, The Science of The Total Environment
  • Designing the Next Generation of Fe0-Based Filters for Decentralized Safe Drinking Water Treatment: A Conceptual Framework, 2020, Processes
  • Metallic Iron for Environmental Remediation: Starting an Overdue Progress in Knowledge, 2020, Water

Chicgoua Noubactep frequently publishes in these venues:

  • Water
  • Processes
  • Scientific Reports
  • Chemosphere
  • Applied Water Science

The scientist collaborates regularly with several co-authors including:

  • Willis Gwenzi
  • Rui Hu
  • Arnaud Igor Ndé-Tchoupé
  • Viet Cao
  • Xuesong Cui

Best Publications

  • Biochar-based water treatment systems as a potential low-cost and sustainable technology for clean water provision.

    Willis Gwenzi;Nhamo Chaukura;Chicgoua Noubactep;Fungai N.D. Mukome

  • A CRITICAL REVIEW ON THE PROCESS OF CONTAMINANT REMOVAL IN FE0–H2O SYSTEMS

    C. Noubactep

  • Nanoscale Metallic Iron for Environmental Remediation: Prospects and Limitations

    Chicgoua Noubactep;Sabine Caré;Richard Crane

  • A multi-method approach to study the stability of natural slopes and landslide susceptibility mapping

    M. Fall;R. Azzam;C. Noubactep

  • The fundamental mechanism of aqueous contaminant removal by metallic iron

    C Noubactep

  • Mechanism of uranium removal from the aqueous solution by elemental iron

    Chicgoua Noubactep;A. Schöner;G. Meinrath

  • Adsorption of methylene blue from an aqueous solution on to activated carbons from palm-tree cobs

    J. Avom;J.Ketcha Mbadcam;C. Noubactep;P. Germain

  • Metallic iron for environmental remediation: A review of reviews.

    Chicgoua Noubactep

  • Processes of Contaminant Removal in Fe0-H2O Systems Revisited: The Importance of Co-Precipitation

    Chicgoua Noubactep

  • An analysis of the evolution of reactive species in Fe0/H2O systems.

    C. Noubactep

  • Nano-scale metallic iron for the treatment of solutions containing multiple inorganic contaminants.

    Thomas Bligh Scott;IC Popescu;Richard Crane;Chicgoua Noubactep

  • Metallic Iron Filters for Universal Access to Safe Drinking Water

    Chicgoua Noubactep;Angelika Schöner;Paul Woafo

  • Mitigating uranium in groundwater: prospects and limitations.

    C Noubactep;G Meinrath;P Dietrich;B Merkel

  • Polyaniline/Fe0 composite nanofibers: An excellent adsorbent for the removal of arsenic from aqueous solutions

    Madhumita Bhaumik;Chicgoua Noubactep;Vinod Kumar Gupta;Rob I. McCrindle

  • Modeling the Permeability Loss of Metallic Iron Water Filtration Systems

    Sabine Caré;Richard Crane;Paolo S. Calabrò;Antoine Ghauch

  • Testing the Suitability of Zerovalent Iron Materials for Reactive Walls

    Chicgoua Noubactep;Günther Meinrath;Peter Dietrich;Martin Sauter

  • Metallic iron for safe drinking water worldwide

    C. Noubactep

  • Discussing porosity loss of Fe0 packed water filters at ground level

    Richard Domga;Fulbert Togue-Kamga;Chicgoua Noubactep;Jean-Bosco Tchatchueng;Jean-Bosco Tchatchueng

  • Metallic iron for safe drinking water provision: Considering a lost knowledge

    Hezron T. Mwakabona;Arnaud Igor Ndé-Tchoupé;Karoli N. Njau;Chicgoua Noubactep

  • Dimensioning metallic iron beds for efficient contaminant removal.

    Chicgoua Noubactep;Sabine Caré

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin Sauter
Martin Sauter University of Göttingen
Paul Woafo
Paul Woafo Université de Yaoundé I
Peter Dietrich
Peter Dietrich University of Tübingen
Mamadou Fall
Mamadou Fall University of Ottawa
Arjun Maity
Arjun Maity Council for Scientific and Industrial Research
Vinod Kumar Gupta
Vinod Kumar Gupta King Abdulaziz University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences opens doors to diverse career paths, but choosing the right program is crucial. For those interested in advancing education roles within environmental advocacy or policy, exploring eds to edd programs can provide the leadership skills needed for impactful work.

Similarly, individuals aiming to combine social work and environmental sustainability may find value in fully funded dsw programs, which offer a financially accessible path to doctoral-level expertise in social work with an environmental focus.

For students weighing affordability, exploring the most affordable online general studies degree programs helps identify cost-effective options that maintain academic quality while providing flexibility for environmental studies.

Those new to higher education or looking for less intensive entry points often wonder about the what's the easiest bachelor's degree to get. While ease varies by individual interest and commitment, choosing an approachable major related to Environmental Sciences can build a strong foundation for future specialization.

Best Scientists Citing Chicgoua Noubactep

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles