World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
47
Citations
9427
World Ranking
5730
National Ranking
383

Carsten Montzka publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carsten Montzka sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 234 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Carsten Montzka D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carsten Montzka sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Carsten Montzka is affiliated with Forschungszentrum Jülich in Germany, contributing extensively to the field of Environmental Science. Their research spans several subfields including Environmental Engineering, Global and Planetary Change, Atmospheric Science, Ecology, and Water Science and Technology.

Their scholarly output focuses on key topics such as Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing, Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics, Remote Sensing in Agriculture, Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies, Climate Variability and Models, Soil and Unsaturated Flow, and Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications.

Montzka has published articles in a variety of academic journals, with frequent publications in Remote Sensing, Remote Sensing of Environment, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, and Hydrology and Earth System Sciences.

Recent notable papers include:

  • Validation practices for satellite soil moisture retrievals: What are (the) errors? (2020), Remote Sensing of Environment
  • Soil hydrology in the Earth system (2022), Nature Reviews Earth & Environment
  • Linking the Remote Sensing of Geodiversity and Traits Relevant to Biodiversity-Part II: Geomorphology, Terrain and Surfaces (2020), Remote Sensing
  • Validation of Soil Moisture Data Products From the NASA SMAP Mission (2021), IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing
  • Value of sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence for quantifying hydrological states and fluxes: Current status and challenges (2020), Agricultural and Forest Meteorology

Montzka collaborates frequently with other researchers, notably:

  • Harry Vereecken (37 joint publications)
  • Bagher Bayat (15 joint publications)
  • Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen (14 joint publications)
  • Thomas Jagdhuber (12 joint publications)
  • François Jonard (10 joint publications)

Their research integrates various disciplines, emphasizing remote sensing technologies to study soil moisture dynamics, plant-water interactions, and hydrological processes within different environmental contexts. The use of satellite data and advanced observational methods is a recurring element in their work, facilitating a better understanding of the Earth's critical zones.

Montzka's contributions to fields such as hydrology, atmospheric science, and environmental engineering are reflected in the diversity of publication venues and the scope of their research topics, which include both theoretical and applied perspectives on environmental processes and remote sensing applications.

Best Publications

  • Modeling Soil Processes: Review, Key Challenges, and New Perspectives

    H. Vereecken;A. Schnepf;J. W. Hopmans;M. Javaux

  • Validation of SMAP surface soil moisture products with core validation sites

    A. Colliander;T.J. Jackson;R. Bindlish;S. Chan

  • Ground, Proximal, and Satellite Remote Sensing of Soil Moisture

    Ebrahim Babaeian;Morteza Sadeghi;Scott B. Jones;Carsten Montzka

  • On the spatio-temporal dynamics of soil moisture at the field scale

    H. Vereecken;J.A. Huisman;Y. Pachepsky;C. Montzka

  • Pedotransfer functions in Earth system science: challenges and perspectives

    Kris Van Looy;Johan Bouma;Michael Herbst;John Koestel

  • Soil Moisture Remote Sensing: State-of-the-Science

    Binayak P. Mohanty;Michael H. Cosh;Venkat Lakshmi;Carsten Montzka

  • Soil hydrology in the Earth system

    Unknown

  • Validation practices for satellite soil moisture retrievals: what are (the) errors?

    A. Gruber;G. de Lannoy;C. Albergel;A. Al-Yaari

  • Hydraulic parameter estimation by remotely-sensed top soil moisture observations with the particle filter

    Carsten Montzka;Hamid Moradkhani;Lutz Weihermüller;Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen

  • Linking the Remote Sensing of Geodiversity and Traits Relevant to Biodiversity—Part II: Geomorphology, Terrain and Surfaces

    Angela Lausch;Angela Lausch;Michael E. Schaepman;Andrew K. Skidmore;Sina C. Truckenbrodt

  • An empirical vegetation correction for soil water content quantification using cosmic ray probes

    R. Baatz;H. R. Bogena;H.-J. Hendricks Franssen;J. A. Huisman

  • A global data set of soil hydraulic properties and sub-grid variability of soil water retention and hydraulic conductivity curves

    Carsten Montzka;Michael Herbst;Lutz Weihermüller;Anne Verhoef

  • The TERENO-Rur Hydrological Observatory: A Multiscale Multi-Compartment Research Platform for the Advancement of Hydrological Science

    H.R. Bogena;C. Montzka;J.A. Huisman;A. Graf

  • Development and analysis of the Soil Water Infiltration Global database

    Mehdi Rahmati;Mehdi Rahmati;Lutz Weihermüller;Jan Vanderborght;Yakov A. Pachepsky

  • Infiltration from the Pedon to Global Grid Scales: An Overview and Outlook for Land Surface Modeling

    Harry Vereecken;Lutz Weihermüller;Shmuel Assouline;Jirka Šimůnek

  • Validation of Spaceborne and Modelled Surface Soil Moisture Products with Cosmic-Ray Neutron Probes

    Carsten Montzka;Heye R Bogena;Marek Zreda;Alessandra Monerris

  • Calibration of a catchment scale cosmic-ray probe network: A comparison of three parameterization methods

    R. Baatz;H.R. Bogena;H.-J. Hendricks Franssen;J.A. Huisman

  • Multivariate and Multiscale Data Assimilation in Terrestrial Systems: A Review

    Carsten Montzka;Valentijn Rachel Noel Pauwels;Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen;Xujun Han

  • Value of sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence for quantifying hydrological states and fluxes: Current status and challenges

    François Jonard;François Jonard;S. De Cannière;N. Brüggemann;P. Gentine

  • Soil moisture and soil properties estimation in the Community Land Model with synthetic brightness temperature observations

    Xujun Han;Xujun Han;Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen;Carsten Montzka;Harry Vereecken

  • Spatiotemporal analysis of soil moisture observations within a Tibetan mesoscale area and its implication to regional soil moisture measurements

    Long Zhao;Kun Yang;Jun Qin;Yingying Chen

  • Brightness Temperature and Soil Moisture Validation at Different Scales During the SMOS Validation Campaign in the Rur and Erft Catchments, Germany

    C. Montzka;H. R. Bogena;L. Weihermuller;F. Jonard

Frequent Co-Authors

Harry Vereecken
Harry Vereecken Forschungszentrum Jülich
Heye Bogena
Heye Bogena Forschungszentrum Jülich
Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen
Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen Forschungszentrum Jülich
Lutz Weihermüller
Lutz Weihermüller Forschungszentrum Jülich
Stefan Kollet
Stefan Kollet Forschungszentrum Jülich
Johan Alexander Huisman
Johan Alexander Huisman Forschungszentrum Jülich
Jan Vanderborght
Jan Vanderborght Forschungszentrum Jülich
Irena Hajnsek
Irena Hajnsek German Aerospace Center
Harald Kunstmann
Harald Kunstmann Karlsruhe Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to diverse career paths, but many students also explore complementary fields through online education. For example, an online bachelors in sociology can provide valuable insight into human-environment interactions, enhancing one’s understanding of social impacts on ecological systems.

For professionals aiming to advance their expertise, numerous doctoral programs online no dissertation offer flexible options that remove traditional barriers like dissertation requirements. This can accelerate career growth in academic or high-level policy roles within environmental fields.

Educators seeking leadership roles may find relevant pathways through eds to edd programs online, enabling a smooth transition to doctoral-level qualifications while balancing ongoing career commitments.

Additionally, social work intersects with environmental advocacy, and affordable online programs like the cheapest dsw program provide cost-effective opportunities to combine social and environmental expertise for holistic community impact.

Best Scientists Citing Carsten Montzka

Trending Scientists