World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
57
Citations
11973
World Ranking
3446
National Ranking
233

Heye Bogena publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Heye Bogena sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 296 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Heye Bogena D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Heye Bogena sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Heye Bogena is affiliated with Forschungszentrum Jülich in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on Environmental Science, with a specialization in subfields such as Environmental Engineering, Global and Planetary Change, Atmospheric Science, Water Science and Technology, and Civil and Structural Engineering.

The main topics of their work include:

  • Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing
  • Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
  • Soil and Unsaturated Flow
  • Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Climate change and permafrost
  • Climate variability and models
  • Cryospheric studies and observations

Among their recent papers are:

  • "The International Soil Moisture Network: serving Earth system science for over a decade" (2021), published in Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
  • "Soil hydrology in the Earth system" (2022), published in Nature Reviews Earth & Environment
  • "COSMOS-Europe: a European network of cosmic-ray neutron soil moisture sensors" (2022), published in Earth System Science Data
  • "A dense network of cosmic-ray neutron sensors for soil moisture observation in a highly instrumented pre-Alpine headwater catchment in Germany" (2020), published in Earth System Science Data
  • "Error Estimation for Soil Moisture Measurements With Cosmic Ray Neutron Sensing and Implications for Rover Surveys" (2020), published in Frontiers in Water

The frequent co-authors collaborating with Heye Bogena include:

  • Harry Vereecken
  • Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen
  • Johan Alexander Huisman
  • Jannis Jakobi
  • Cosimo Brogi

Their work has been published predominantly in the following scientific venues:

  • Frontiers in Water
  • Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
  • Sensors
  • Water Resources Research
  • Earth System Science Data

Best Publications

  • On the value of soil moisture measurements in vadose zone hydrology: a review

    H. Vereecken;J. A. Huisman;H. Bogena;J. Vanderborght

  • On the spatio-temporal dynamics of soil moisture at the field scale

    H. Vereecken;J.A. Huisman;Y. Pachepsky;C. Montzka

  • A Network of Terrestrial Environmental Observatories in Germany

    Steffen Zacharias;Heye Bogena;Luis Samaniego;Matthias Mauder

  • Evaluation of a low-cost soil water content sensor for wireless network applications

    H.R. Bogena;J.A. Huisman;C. Oberdörster;H. Vereecken

  • Potential of Wireless Sensor Networks for Measuring Soil Water Content Variability

    H.R. Bogena;M. Herbst;J.A. Huisman;U. Rosenbaum

  • The International Soil Moisture Network: Serving Earth system science for over a decade

    Wouter Dorigo;Irene Himmelbauer;Daniel Aberer;Lukas Schremmer

  • Seasonal and event dynamics of spatial soil moisture patterns at the small catchment scale

    U. Rosenbaum;H. R. Bogena;M. Herbst;J. A. Huisman

  • Soil hydrology in the Earth system

    Unknown

  • Soil hydrology: Recent methodological advances, challenges, and perspectives

    H. Vereecken;J. A. Huisman;H. J. Hendricks Franssen;N. Brüggemann

  • Accuracy of the cosmic-ray soil water content probe in humid forest ecosystems: The worst case scenario

    H. R. Bogena;J. A. Huisman;R. Baatz;H.-J. Hendricks Franssen

  • Measurements and Observations in the XXI century (MOXXI): innovation and multi-disciplinarity to sense the hydrological cycle

    Flavia Tauro;John Selker;Nick van de Giesen;Tommaso Abrate

  • Spatio-temporal soil moisture patterns - A meta-analysis using plot to catchment scale data

    W. Korres;T.G. Reichenau;P. Fiener;C.N. Koyama

  • Spatial and temporal occurrence of preferential flow in a forested headwater catchment

    I. Wiekenkamp;J.A. Huisman;H.R. Bogena;H.S. Lin

  • An empirical vegetation correction for soil water content quantification using cosmic ray probes

    R. Baatz;H. R. Bogena;H.-J. Hendricks Franssen;J. A. Huisman

  • Improving calibration and validation of cosmic-ray neutron sensors in the light of spatial sensitivity

    Martin Schrön;Markus Köhli;Markus Köhli;Markus Köhli;Lena Scheiffele;Joost Iwema

  • Status and perspectives on the cosmic-ray neutron method for soil moisture estimation and other environmental science applications.

    Mie Andreasen;Karsten H. Jensen;Darin Desilets;Trenton E. Franz

  • The TERENO-Rur Hydrological Observatory: A Multiscale Multi-Compartment Research Platform for the Advancement of Hydrological Science

    H.R. Bogena;C. Montzka;J.A. Huisman;A. Graf

  • Sensor-to-Sensor Variability of the ECH2O EC-5, TE, and 5TE Sensors in Dielectric Liquids

    U. Rosenbaum;J.A. Huisman;A. Weuthen;H. Vereecken

  • Emerging methods for noninvasive sensing of soil moisture dynamics from field to catchment scale: a review

    Heye R. Bogena;Johan A. Huisman;Andreas Güntner;Christof Hübner

  • Hybrid Wireless Underground Sensor Networks: Quantification of Signal Attenuation in Soil

    H. R. Bogena;J. A. Huisman;H. Meier;U. Rosenbaum

  • Validation of Spaceborne and Modelled Surface Soil Moisture Products with Cosmic-Ray Neutron Probes

    Carsten Montzka;Heye R Bogena;Marek Zreda;Alessandra Monerris

  • Calibration of a catchment scale cosmic-ray probe network: A comparison of three parameterization methods

    R. Baatz;H.R. Bogena;H.-J. Hendricks Franssen;J.A. Huisman

Frequent Co-Authors

Harry Vereecken
Harry Vereecken Forschungszentrum Jülich
Johan Alexander Huisman
Johan Alexander Huisman Forschungszentrum Jülich
Carsten Montzka
Carsten Montzka Forschungszentrum Jülich
Bernd Diekkrüger
Bernd Diekkrüger University of Bonn
Andreas Lücke
Andreas Lücke Forschungszentrum Jülich
Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen
Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen Forschungszentrum Jülich
Jan Vanderborght
Jan Vanderborght Forschungszentrum Jülich
Irena Hajnsek
Irena Hajnsek German Aerospace Center
Harald Kunstmann
Harald Kunstmann Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Marek Zreda
Marek Zreda University of Arizona

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to diverse career paths and further education options. Many students aim to enhance their expertise with advanced degrees, including flexible options like a doctorate degree online no dissertation. These programs are ideal for professionals seeking to advance without the intensive research commitment of a traditional dissertation.

For educators or those interested in leadership roles within environmental education, exploring the best online eds to edd programs offers a clear progression from a master’s to a doctorate degree. This pathway enhances skills in educational strategies and policy development relevant to environmental sustainability.

If your interests lean toward social work aspects related to environmental justice, affordable credentials such as the online dsw programs provide valuable expertise to support vulnerable communities impacted by environmental changes.

Alternatively, for those seeking broad knowledge with cost-effective options, the best affordable online general studies degree programs allow for customizable curricula that can include environmental studies combined with other disciplines.

Best Scientists Citing Heye Bogena

Trending Scientists