World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 47 5834 5595 2124 1967 1317 7691

Jordan E. Krechmer publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jordan E. Krechmer between 2011 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jordan E. Krechmer published across 16 years, from 2011 to 2026, averaging 14.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 48 publications in 2020. 8 of the 234 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2011 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 48. Peak 48 publications in 2020. 2011: 1 publication 2012: 0 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 38 publications 2020: 48 publications 2021: 42 publications 2022: 26 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 7 publications 2026: 1 publication
2011 2026

234 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jordan E. Krechmer: publications per year, 2011 to 2026
Year Publications
2011 1
2012 0
2013 5
2014 3
2015 9
2016 14
2017 16
2018 15
2019 38
2020 48
2021 42
2022 26
2023 0
2024 9
2025 7
2026 1
Total 234
Download as CSV

Jordan E. Krechmer publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jordan E. Krechmer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 690+ publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 1,317 publications — 100th percentile

100% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100 1,317
Download as CSV

Jordan E. Krechmer D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jordan E. Krechmer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275 47
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Jordan E. Krechmer is affiliated with the Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines primarily within Earth and Planetary Sciences and Physics and Astronomy. Their work covers specialized subfields including Astronomy and Astrophysics, Oceanography, Geophysics, Atmospheric Science, and areas related to Health, Toxicology, and Mutagenesis.

The scientist's research has contributed to topics broadly related to atmospheric and environmental sciences. These include:

  • Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
  • Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
  • Earthquake Detection and Analysis
  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
  • Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting

Krechmer has coauthored frequently with several researchers including Laura Meredith, Holly Andrews, Elizabeth Eder, Marija Veličković, and Joseph Roscioli. Their collaborative efforts have resulted in multiple publications across different venues.

Their recent papers demonstrate a focus on atmospheric chemistry, aerosol formation, and ecosystem dynamics. Notable papers include:

  • "Rapid growth of new atmospheric particles by nitric acid and ammonia condensation," published in 2020 in Nature
  • "Role of iodine oxoacids in atmospheric aerosol nucleation," published in 2021 in Science
  • "Molecular mechanism for rapid autoxidation in α-pinene ozonolysis," published in 2021 in Nature Communications
  • "Chemical characterization of oxygenated organic compounds in the gas phase and particle phase using iodide CIMS with FIGAERO in urban air," published in 2021 in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • "Ecosystem fluxes during drought and recovery in an experimental forest," published in 2021 in Science

Publications by Krechmer appear frequently in noted venues such as:

  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Environmental Science & Technology

Their publication record includes thousands of contributions, particularly in Earth and Planetary Sciences and Astronomy. This extensive output points to a sustained engagement with geophysical phenomena, atmospheric processes, and their implications for environmental monitoring and health.

Best Publications

  • Evaluation of a New Reagent-Ion Source and Focusing Ion-Molecule Reactor for Use in Proton-Transfer-Reaction Mass Spectrometry.

    Jordan Krechmer;Felipe Lopez-Hilfiker;Abigail Koss;Abigail Koss;Abigail Koss;Manuel Hutterli

  • Non-methane organic gas emissions from biomass burning: identification, quantification, and emission factors from PTR-ToF during the FIREX 2016 laboratory experiment

    Abigail R. Koss;Kanako Sekimoto;Kanako Sekimoto;Kanako Sekimoto;Jessica B. Gilman;Vanessa Selimovic

  • Aqueous-phase mechanism for secondary organic aerosol formation from isoprene: application to the southeast United States and co-benefit of SO2 emission controls

    Eloise A Marais;Daniel J Jacob;Jose L Jimenez;Jose L Jimenez;Pedro Campuzano-Jost;Pedro Campuzano-Jost

  • Rapid growth of new atmospheric particles by nitric acid and ammonia condensation.

    Mingyi Wang;Weimeng Kong;Ruby Marten;Xu Cheng He

  • Quantification of Gas-Wall Partitioning in Teflon Environmental Chambers Using Rapid Bursts of Low-Volatility Oxidized Species Generated in Situ.

    Jordan E. Krechmer;Jordan E. Krechmer;Demetrios Pagonis;Demetrios Pagonis;Paul J. Ziemann;Paul J. Ziemann;Jose L. Jimenez;Jose L. Jimenez

  • Formation of Low Volatility Organic Compounds and Secondary Organic Aerosol from Isoprene Hydroxyhydroperoxide Low-NO Oxidation.

    Jordan E. Krechmer;Jordan E. Krechmer;Matthew M. Coggon;Paola Massoli;Tran B. Nguyen

  • Evaluating the performance of five different chemical ionization techniques for detecting gaseous oxygenated organic species

    Matthieu Riva;Matthieu Riva;Pekka Rantala;Jordan E. Krechmer;Otso Peräkylä

  • Characterization of a real-time tracer for isoprene epoxydiols-derived secondary organic aerosol (IEPOX-SOA) from aerosol mass spectrometer measurements

    W. W. Hu;P. Campuzano-Jost;B. B. Palm;D. A. Day

  • Impact of Thermal Decomposition on Thermal Desorption Instruments: Advantage of Thermogram Analysis for Quantifying Volatility Distributions of Organic Species.

    Harald Stark;Harald Stark;Reddy L. N. Yatavelli;Reddy L. N. Yatavelli;Samantha L. Thompson;Samantha L. Thompson;Hyungu Kang;Hyungu Kang

  • Role of iodine oxoacids in atmospheric aerosol nucleation.

    Xu-Cheng He;Yee Jun Tham;Lubna Dada;Mingyi Wang

  • Ecosystem fluxes during drought and recovery in an experimental forest

    Unknown

  • Effects of gas–wall partitioning in Teflon tubing and instrumentation on time-resolved measurements of gas-phase organic compounds

    Demetrios Pagonis;Demetrios Pagonis;Jordan Edward Krechmer;Jordan Edward Krechmer;Joost A. de Gouw;Joost A. de Gouw;Jose L. Jimenez;Jose L. Jimenez

  • Molecular mechanism for rapid autoxidation in α-pinene ozonolysis.

    Siddharth Iyer;Matti P. Rissanen;Rashid Valiev;Rashid Valiev;Shawon Barua

  • Chemical characterization of oxygenated organic compounds in the gas phase and particle phase using iodide CIMS with FIGAERO in urban air

    Chenshuo Ye;Bin Yuan;Yi Lin;Zelong Wang

  • OH chemistry of non-methane organic gases (NMOGs) emitted from laboratory and ambient biomass burning smoke: evaluating the influence of furans and oxygenated aromatics on ozone and secondary NMOG formation

    Matthew M. Coggon;Matthew M. Coggon;Christopher Y. Lim;Abigail R. Koss;Abigail R. Koss;Kanako Sekimoto;Kanako Sekimoto;Kanako Sekimoto

  • Laboratory Investigation of Renoxification from the Photolysis of Inorganic Particulate Nitrate.

    Qianwen Shi;Ye Tao;Jordan E Krechmer;Colette L Heald

  • Volatility and lifetime against OH heterogeneous reaction of ambient isoprene-epoxydiols-derived secondary organic aerosol (IEPOX-SOA)

    Weiwei Hu;Weiwei Hu;Brett B. Palm;Brett B. Palm;Douglas A. Day;Douglas A. Day;Pedro Campuzano-Jost;Pedro Campuzano-Jost

  • Ambient Measurements of Highly Oxidized Gas-Phase Molecules during the Southern Oxidant and Aerosol Study (SOAS) 2013

    Paola Massoli;Harald Stark;Harald Stark;Manjula R. Canagaratna;Jordan E. Krechmer;Jordan E. Krechmer

  • Mechanistic study of the formation of ring-retaining and ring-opening products from the oxidation of aromatic compounds under urban atmospheric conditions.

    Alexander Zaytsev;Abigail R. Koss;Martin Breitenlechner;Jordan E. Krechmer

  • Measurements of delays of gas-phase compounds in a wide variety of tubing materials due to gas–wall interactions

    Benjamin L. Deming;Demetrios Pagonis;Xiaoxi Liu;Douglas A. Day

  • Functional Group Composition of Secondary Organic Aerosol Formed from Ozonolysis of α-Pinene Under High VOC and Autoxidation Conditions

    Megan S. Claflin;Megan S. Claflin;Jordan E. Krechmer;Jordan E. Krechmer;Weiwei Hu;Weiwei Hu;Jose L. Jimenez;Jose L. Jimenez

  • Ion mobility spectrometry-mass spectrometry (IMS-MS) for on- and offline analysis of atmospheric gas and aerosol species

    Jordan E. Krechmer;Jordan E. Krechmer;Michael Groessl;Xuan Zhang;Heikki Junninen

Frequent Co-Authors

Jose L. Jimenez
Jose L. Jimenez University of Colorado Boulder
Harald Stark
Harald Stark University of Colorado Boulder
Douglas R. Worsnop
Douglas R. Worsnop University of Helsinki
Douglas A. Day
Douglas A. Day University of Colorado Boulder
Weiwei Hu
Weiwei Hu Chinese Academy of Sciences
Brian M. Lerner
Brian M. Lerner Aerodyne Research
Carsten Warneke
Carsten Warneke National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Paul J. Ziemann
Paul J. Ziemann University of Colorado Boulder

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, pursuing related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. A strong foundation in earth sciences is essential, making the best online geology degree programs a valuable choice for understanding Earth's processes and natural resources.

Given the critical role of technology in environmental management, expertise in spatial data analysis is increasingly in demand. The best gis programs offer specialized training in Geographic Information Systems, enabling graduates to map, analyze, and solve environmental challenges effectively.

Leadership and policy influence are crucial for driving sustainable solutions. Professionals aiming to impact public sector environmental policies can benefit from the best online masters in public administration, which equips students with skills in management and governance.

Understanding social dynamics is equally important in addressing environmental issues. The online sociology bachelor programs prepare students to analyze human behavior and societal trends, complementing their environmental expertise.

Best Scientists Citing Jordan E. Krechmer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles