World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
John T. Jayne

John T. Jayne

Award Badge
Environmental Sciences
USA
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 104 1046 922 415 334 271 41986
Environmental Sciences 106 252 235 114 104 291 43230

John T. Jayne publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by John T. Jayne between 1989 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. John T. Jayne published across 37 years, from 1989 to 2025, averaging 8.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2004. 11 of the 316 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1989 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2004. 1989: 2 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 2 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 4 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 14 publications 2004: 20 publications 2005: 15 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 17 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 7 publications
1989 2025

316 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
John T. Jayne: publications per year, 1989 to 2025
Year Publications
1989 2
1990 2
1991 2
1992 1
1993 2
1994 2
1995 4
1996 1
1997 4
1998 7
1999 5
2000 5
2001 7
2002 10
2003 14
2004 20
2005 15
2006 10
2007 9
2008 10
2009 13
2010 17
2011 11
2012 9
2013 11
2014 8
2015 15
2016 12
2017 13
2018 16
2019 13
2020 12
2021 13
2022 4
2023 6
2024 4
2025 7
Total 316
Download as CSV

John T. Jayne publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John T. Jayne sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 291–300 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 291 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127 291
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

John T. Jayne D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John T. Jayne sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 106 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 106 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15 106
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Environmental Sciences in United States Leader Award

Overview

John T. Jayne is affiliated with MIT in the United States and has contributed extensively to fields related to environmental science and earth and planetary sciences. Their research encompasses numerous subfields, including atmospheric science, health, toxicology and mutagenesis, global and planetary change, environmental engineering, and biomedical engineering.

The scientist's work primarily focuses on atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, air quality and health impacts, atmospheric ozone and climate, atmospheric aerosols and clouds, air quality monitoring and forecasting, indoor air quality and microbial exposure, and advanced chemical sensor technologies.

Among their recent publications are:

  • "An in situ gas chromatograph with automatic detector switching between PTR- and EI-TOF-MS: isomer-resolved measurements of indoor air" (2021) in Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
  • "Evaluation of the chemical composition of gas- and particle-phase products of aromatic oxidation" (2020) in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • "On the calibration of FIGAERO-ToF-CIMS: importance and impact of calibrant delivery for the particle-phase calibration" (2021) in Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
  • "Strong temperature influence and indiscernible ventilation effect on dynamics of some semivolatile organic compounds in the indoor air of an office" (2022) in Environment International
  • "Using highly time-resolved online mass spectrometry to examine biogenic and anthropogenic contributions to organic aerosol in Beijing" (2021) in Faraday Discussions

Frequent co-authors of John T. Jayne include:

  • Manjula R. Canagaratna
  • Douglas R. Worsnop
  • Philip Croteau
  • Jordan Krechmer
  • Andrew T. Lambe

The scientist has published regularly in several specific venues, among which are:

  • Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
  • Aerosol Science and Technology
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • ACS Earth and Space Chemistry
  • Environmental Science & Technology

Best Publications

  • Evolution of Organic Aerosols in the Atmosphere

    J. L. Jimenez;M. R. Canagaratna;N. M. Donahue;A. S. H. Prevot

  • Field-Deployable, High-Resolution, Time-of-Flight Aerosol Mass Spectrometer

    Peter F. DeCarlo;Joel R. Kimmel;Achim Trimborn;Megan J. Northway

  • Chemical and microphysical characterization of ambient aerosols with the aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer

    M. R. Canagaratna;J. T. Jayne;J. L. Jimenez;J. D. Allan

  • Development of an Aerosol Mass Spectrometer for Size and Composition Analysis of Submicron Particles

    John T. Jayne;Danna C. Leard;Xuefeng Zhang;Paul Davidovits

  • Ambient aerosol sampling using the Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometer

    Jose L. Jimenez;Jose L. Jimenez;John T. Jayne;Quan Shi;Charles E. Kolb

  • Elemental ratio measurements of organic compounds using aerosol mass spectrometry: characterization, improved calibration, and implications

    M. R. Canagaratna;J. L. Jimenez;J. H. Kroll;Q. Chen

  • An Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor (ACSM) for Routine Monitoring of the Composition and Mass Concentrations of Ambient Aerosol

    N. L. Ng;S. C. Herndon;A. Trimborn;M. R. Canagaratna

  • A New Time-of-Flight Aerosol Mass Spectrometer (TOF-AMS)—Instrument Description and First Field Deployment

    Frank Drewnick;Silke S. Hings;Peter DeCarlo;John T. Jayne

  • A generalised method for the extraction of chemically resolved mass spectra from aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer data

    James D Allan;Alice E Delia;Hugh Coe;Keith N Bower

  • Aerosol mass spectrometer for size and composition analysis of submicron particles

    J.T. Jayne;D.R. Worsnop;C.E. Kolb;D. Leard

  • Quantitative sampling using an Aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer 1. Techniques of data interpretation and error analysis

    James D. Allan;Jose L. Jimenez;Jose L. Jimenez;Paul I. Williams;M. Rami Alfarra

  • Chase Studies of Particulate Emissions from in-use New York City Vehicles

    Manjula R. Canagaratna;John T. Jayne;David A. Ghertner;Scott Herndon

  • Soot Particle Aerosol Mass Spectrometer: Development, Validation, and Initial Application

    T. B. Onasch;A. Trimborn;E. C. Fortner;J. T. Jayne

  • Characterization of urban and rural organic particulate in the Lower Fraser Valley using two Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometers

    M. Rami Alfarra;Hugh Coe;James D. Allan;Keith N. Bower

  • Evaluation of a New Reagent-Ion Source and Focusing Ion-Molecule Reactor for Use in Proton-Transfer-Reaction Mass Spectrometry.

    Jordan Krechmer;Felipe Lopez-Hilfiker;Abigail Koss;Abigail Koss;Abigail Koss;Manuel Hutterli

  • Long-term real-time measurements of aerosol particle composition in Beijing, China: seasonal variations, meteorological effects, and source analysis

    Y. L. Sun;Z. F. Wang;W. Du;W. Du;Q. Zhang

  • Transmission Efficiency of an Aerodynamic Focusing Lens System: Comparison of Model Calculations and Laboratory Measurements for the Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometer

    Peter S. K. Liu;Rensheng Deng;Kenneth A. Smith;Leah R. Williams

  • Mass accommodation and chemical reactions at gas-liquid interfaces.

    Paul Davidovits;Charles E. Kolb;Leah R. Williams;John T. Jayne

  • Time- and size-resolved chemical composition of submicron particles in Pittsburgh: Implications for aerosol sources and processes

    Qi Zhang;Manjula R. Canagaratna;John T. Jayne;Douglas R. Worsnop

  • Characterization of ambient aerosols in Mexico City during the MCMA-2003 campaign with Aerosol Mass Spectrometry: results from the CENICA Supersite

    D. Salcedo;D. Salcedo;T. B. Onasch;K. Dzepina;M. R. Canagaratna

  • Enhanced light absorption by mixed source black and brown carbon particles in UK winter

    Shang Liu;Shang Liu;Allison C. Aiken;Kyle Gorkowski;Kyle Gorkowski;Manvendra K. Dubey

  • Particle Morphology and Density Characterization by Combined Mobility and Aerodynamic Diameter Measurements. Part 2: Application to Combustion-Generated Soot Aerosols as a Function of Fuel Equivalence Ratio

    Jay G. Slowik;K. Stainken;Paul Davidovits;L. R. Williams

  • Technical note A generalised method for the extraction of chemically resolved mass spectra from Aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer data

    James D. Allan;Alice E. Delia;Hugh Coe;Keith N. Bower

Frequent Co-Authors

Douglas R. Worsnop
Douglas R. Worsnop University of Helsinki
Jose L. Jimenez
Jose L. Jimenez University of Colorado Boulder
Timothy B. Onasch
Timothy B. Onasch Boston College
Charles E. Kolb
Charles E. Kolb Aerodyne Research
Leah R. Williams
Leah R. Williams Aerodyne Research
Hugh Coe
Hugh Coe University of Manchester
Paul Davidovits
Paul Davidovits Boston College
James Allan
James Allan University of Manchester
Scott C. Herndon
Scott C. Herndon Aerodyne Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences opens doors to various specialized fields that complement and enhance career prospects. For those passionate about studying Earth's physical structure, exploring geology degrees online provides foundational knowledge essential for environmental assessment and resource management.

Geographic Information Systems (GIS) is another rapidly growing area that integrates technology with environmental data analysis. Students interested in mapping and spatial data can benefit from researching the best GIS programs in the US, which offer practical tools for environmental monitoring and planning.

Leadership and policy development are critical for driving sustainable environmental initiatives. One-year Master of Public Administration options, highlighted in 1 year MPA programs, enable professionals to quickly gain strategic skills relevant for environmental governance and advocacy.

Understanding social dynamics and human behavior is equally important in formulating effective environmental policies. Pursuing best online bachelors in sociology programs can provide the sociological insights necessary for addressing environmental justice and community impact issues.

Best Scientists Citing John T. Jayne

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles