World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 60 3537 3259 1992 1794 370 13626

Bob Algozzine publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Bob Algozzine between 1976 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Bob Algozzine published across 48 years, from 1976 to 2023, averaging 8.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2010. 4 of the 423 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1976 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2010. 1976: 2 publications 1977: 7 publications 1978: 5 publications 1979: 10 publications 1980: 13 publications 1981: 15 publications 1982: 14 publications 1983: 18 publications 1984: 4 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 6 publications 1987: 5 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 7 publications 1991: 7 publications 1992: 7 publications 1993: 12 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 9 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 12 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 13 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 16 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 24 publications 2011: 15 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 19 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 1 publication
1976 2023

423 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Bob Algozzine: publications per year, 1976 to 2023
Year Publications
1976 2
1977 7
1978 5
1979 10
1980 13
1981 15
1982 14
1983 18
1984 4
1985 3
1986 6
1987 5
1988 3
1989 4
1990 7
1991 7
1992 7
1993 12
1994 1
1995 9
1996 2
1997 7
1998 6
1999 7
2000 9
2001 9
2002 10
2003 7
2004 12
2005 5
2006 13
2007 11
2008 16
2009 10
2010 24
2011 15
2012 16
2013 7
2014 19
2015 12
2016 13
2017 11
2018 7
2019 10
2020 2
2021 7
2022 3
2023 1
Total 423
Download as CSV

Bob Algozzine publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bob Algozzine sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 361–370 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 370 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71 370
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Bob Algozzine D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bob Algozzine sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 60–61 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321 60
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Bob Algozzine is affiliated with the University of North Carolina at Charlotte in the United States. Their research contributions span several interconnected fields, predominantly focusing on education and psychology.

Their recent publications cover a range of topics within the educational and psychological domains. Some of the notable papers include:

  • Families of children with disabilities helping inform early childhood education, 2021, Journal of Children s Services
  • Founding and executive editors' comments: beyond multicultural "Wokeness": the need for real "GOATS" in education, 2021, Multicultural Learning and Teaching
  • Founding and executive editors' comments: reducing racism and xenophobia in colleges/schools of education, 2022, Multicultural Learning and Teaching
  • Shifting paradigms and powers from morally repugnant leadership to morally caring leadership, 2020, Multicultural Learning and Teaching
  • Founding and executive editors' comments: why care about what multicultural students see in education?, 2021, Multicultural Learning and Teaching

The frequent co-authors who have collaborated with Bob Algozzine include:

  • Festus E. Obiakor
  • Vivian I. Correa
  • Eugene F. Asola
  • Lyndal M. Bullock
  • Bridgie Alexis Ford

The main venues where Algozzine's work has been published are:

  • Multicultural Learning and Teaching
  • Journal of Children s Services

Their research interests align mostly with the following subfields of study:

  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Information Systems
  • Clinical Psychology

Bob Algozzine's work addresses key topics within education and psychology, such as:

  • Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion
  • Educational Practices and Challenges
  • Family and Disability Support Research
  • Parental Involvement in Education
  • Educational and Psychological Assessments
  • Psychology of Development and Education
  • Educational Challenges and Innovations

Best Publications

  • Effects of Interventions to Promote Self-Determination for Individuals With Disabilities:

    Bob Algozzine;Diane Browder;Meagan Karvonen;David W. Test

  • Tips for Teaching: Differentiating Instruction to Include All Students

    Bob Algozzine;Kelly M. Anderson

  • Research on Reading Instruction for Individuals with Significant Cognitive Disabilities

    Diane M. Browder;Shawnee Y. Wakeman;Fred Spooner;Lynn Ahlgrim-Delzell

  • Similarities and Differences Between Low Achievers and Students Classified Learning Disabled

    James E. Ysseldyke;Bob Algozzine;Mark R. Shinn;Matthew McGue

  • Multicultural Issues in Autism

    Tina Taylor Dyches;Lynn K. Wilder;Richard R. Sudweeks;Festus E. Obiakor

  • Making Inclusion Work in General Education Classrooms

    Festus E. Obiakor;Mateba Harris;Kagendo Mutua;Anthony Rotatori

  • Generalizations from Five Years of Research on Assessment and Decision Making: The University of Minnesota Institute:

    James E. Ysseldyke;Martha Thurlow;Janet Graden;Caren Wesson

  • Reexamining the Relationship between Academic Achievement and Social Behavior.

    Bob Algozzine;Chuang Wang;Amy S. Violette

  • Student Evaluation of College Teaching: A Practice in Search of Principles.

    Bob Algozzine;John Gretes;Claudia Flowers;Lisa Howley

  • Student Ratings of Instruction in Distance Learning and On-Campus Classes

    Fred Spooner;Luann Jordan;Bob Algozzine;Melba Spooner

  • Declaring Students Eligible for Learning Disability Services: Why Bother with the Data?

    James E. Ysseldyke;Bob Algozzine;Linda Richey;Janet Graden

  • Beginning Teachers' Perceptions of Their Induction Program Experiences.

    Bob Algozzine;John Gretes;Allen J. Queen;Misty Cowan-Hathcock

  • Putting Self-Determination into Practice

    Meagan Karvonen;David W. Test;Wendy M. Wood;Diane Browder

  • Early Integration and Other Outcomes for Community College Transfer Students

    Mark M. D’Amico;Sandra L. Dika;Theodore W. Elling;Bob Algozzine

  • Probabilities Associated with the Referral to Placement Process.

    B. Algozzine;Sandra L. Christenson;James E. Ysseldyke

  • Scaling Up School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports: Experiences of Seven States With Documented Success

    Robert H. Horner;Donald Kincaid;George Sugai;Timothy Lewis

  • A Logical and Empirical Analysis of Current Practice in Classifying Students as Handicapped

    James E Ysseldyke;Bob Algozzine;Susan Epps

  • Perceptions of the Impact of Accountability on the Role of Principals

    James E. Lyons;Bob Algozzine

  • Critical issues in special and remedial education

    James E. Ysseldyke;Bob Algozzine

  • Response to Intervention and Positive Behavior Support: Brothers from Different Mothers or Sisters with Different Misters?

    Therese Sandomierski;Don Kincaid;Bob Algozzine

  • Culturally Responsive Teaching

    Bob Algozzine;Ann Daunic;Stephen Smith

Frequent Co-Authors

James E. Ysseldyke
James E. Ysseldyke University of Minnesota
Fred Spooner
Fred Spooner University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Martha L. Thurlow
Martha L. Thurlow University of Minnesota
Robert H. Horner
Robert H. Horner University of Oregon
Claudia Flowers
Claudia Flowers University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Sandra L. Christenson
Sandra L. Christenson University of Minnesota
Diane M. Browder
Diane M. Browder University of North Carolina at Charlotte
David W. Test
David W. Test University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Mark R. Shinn
Mark R. Shinn University of Oregon
Wendy Wood
Wendy Wood University of Southern California

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens doors to a variety of rewarding career paths, including becoming a Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT). As interest in online education grows, many students seek flexible programs that meet licensure requirements in specific locations.

Educational requirements and licensure for MFTs can vary by state and city, so it’s essential to understand local regulations. For instance, mft requirements in Tulsa emphasize specific graduate coursework and supervised clinical experience. Similarly, if you are looking at the mft requirements in Virginia Beach, you'll notice unique criteria tailored to Virginia’s standards.

For those interested in practicing in the nation’s capital, learning how to become an mft in Washington DC is crucial, as D.C. has its own credentialing process. Those considering therapy roles in Kansas should review Wichita mft education requirements for local licensure.

Choosing an online psychology degree that aligns with state regulations can help pave the way for a meaningful and impactful career in mental health.

Best Scientists Citing Bob Algozzine

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles